I'm born & bred in United States of Bizana & extremely proud of that. NDILIMPONDO LASEMAMPONDWENI. Ndiyamthanda KAKHUL uThixo. Twiter isnt for fainthearted pepo
@CWharlie4@Julius_S_Malema They're also defending the Phalaphala man and DA is defending their cabinet positions. Let's stay with our EFF @MYANC@Our_DA ... We will punish them on the ballots
Following Gen. Sibiya’s testimony, Imran Butt claims that the top cop extorted him of money “running into millions.” He claims he has proof and is willing to testify at the Madlanga Commission.
Butt’s Facebook page boasts photos with a string of politicians and police officers. He also has videos where he attended and spoke at police award ceremonies
@MahlaseSanele@AdvoBarryRoux Stop being selfish. We can all get angry without being racist, tribalist, sexist nor harassing, but tribalism is not part of anger. Zulus have nothing better than the rest of Safatrikenz but you Zulus like defending nonsense.
@Xjournalist111 @elonmusk Well said XJournalist. @elonmusk It's not like you care for Black people in South Africa, till today, you have done nothing to help them with your trillions. So, honestly, your opinion in South African affairs means nothing except you trying to cause division.
You don’t get it, do you?
The simultaneous demand for Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi’s presence by both the Madlanga Commission and the Parliamentary Ad Hoc Committee on the same dates stems from a clash of political tensions, and strategic maneuvering, not mere logistical oversight. The commission seeks broad systemic insights. The committee demands immediate political accountability. The ANC-led executive (including Minister Mchunu) has a vested interest in delaying or diluting Mkhwanazi’s testimony.
Keeping him occupied with the commission (a longer, judicial process) starves the parliamentary committee of timely evidence, shielding implicated officials. This is a classic “process as punishment” tactic, overwhelm a whistleblower with procedures to exhaust public attention. The EFF and opposition parties insist that Parliament, as the direct representative of the people, must hear Mkhwanazi first or concurrently, to ensure transparency and prevent evidence manipulation.
The commission’s schedule is set by the Department of Justice, while the committee’s schedule is set by Parliament. The lack of coordination is likely by design:
· It creates plausible deniability for those accused.
· It allows Mkhwanazi to be accused of “avoiding” Parliament if he prioritizes the commission.
As Julius Malema noted “They want to use the commission to silence him in Parliament... We won’t allow it.”
If he testifies first to the commission, his evidence becomes sub judice, limiting its use in Parliament. If he prioritizes Parliament, the commission (and its broader mandate) is delayed, risking accusations of obstructing justice. It is Mkhwanazi’s legal team that should navigate these waters carefully to avoid contempt charges or political backlash not Malema.
This conflict isn’t about schedules, it’s about whether accountability will be led by a judicial process (controlled by the executive) or by Parliament (accountable to the public).
The executive prefers the commission: slower, less public, and easier to influence.
The opposition demands parliamentary scrutiny: transparent, immediate, and politically consequential. The public deserves full, unfiltered testimony, not a diluted version filtered through legal and political maneuvering in commission.
This Is a Battle for Transparency
The scheduling clash is a proxy war between:
· Forces protecting the status quo (using the commission to delay).
· Forces demanding accountability (using Parliament to expose).
Mkhwanazi must testify to both, but on a timeline that serves justice, and public not politicians.
Hope you get it now.
@Alentoe@SixoGcilishe Speaking doesn't mean talk 30 minutes or so. So, my point is that you don't need preparation to speak from your heart, about the organization that feeds you, the organization that you have been part of for over 5 years.
@VITO_G_Wagon So you want Dr Ndlozi to please you.... When are you member going to please him❓ Whoever alleges wrong in Dr Ndlozi must prove. Dr Ndlozi has been bullied by @Julius_S_Malema for so many years and you EFF masses never stood up to defend him. As it stands, Malema 0 - 2 Dr Ndlozi
@Ukgeteng1@Sinawo_Thambo@MbuyiseniNdlozi The reason I didn't vote for EFF its because of @Julius_S_Malema telling us that foreigners who take our jobs and bring drugs in the country must be allowed to walk freely. Me and my family we have been voting EFF since it's formation, not anymore unless foreigner policy change
@EFFSouthAfrica@MbalulaFikile@Our_DA@SakinaKamwendo@Newzroom405@eNCA before elections, DA was advocating removal of ANC from power, soon after, DA was the first to take their voters votes to ANC to govern.
In 2029, I will use my influence to discourage people from voting.
@Evidence_Shongw@MbalulaFikile Mbalula hates blacks to extent that they chose whites whom don't give a damn about us. EFF only wanted only two positions or even indicated a will to accept one. WRT MKP, ANC never engaged them in good faith. ANC know nothing about good faith. ANC shouldn't have 45% cabinet reps