@Joe09765290@BBLouisR@JuliaHB1@chriselizabeth I’m not sure what you’re eluding to Joe, but say it plainly.
It’s quite clear I can understand the language, as well as interpret its nuance. So what is it you’re questioning?
@BBLouisR@JuliaHB1@chriselizabeth You’re getting two things muddled up here Louis.
There’s also the wider point of legalising sex work so women aren’t having to put themselves at risk.
Furthermore it’s illegal for anyone to have sex in public - that doesn’t stop people.
@Topstriker98@Inevitablewest@Keir_Starmer Come back for a second nibble have you?
Labelling someone, while failing at the very thing you’re suggesting is in place? Interesting.
@JuliaHB1@chriselizabeth Julia this sounds a little bit like you’re judging women who work in the sex industry.
I’m sure that’s not the case, as it would make your own grounding a little rocky on this matter.
@Marb82Les@GeorgeWarwick12@TRobinsonNewEra Who’s “it”?
You meant what video? “III” and “III” are the same, and why would you type “iii” unless your next point is “iv” at which point you’re proving my point.
Please continue embarrassing yourself - you’ve waited months for this opportunity, don’t waste it.
@Marb82Les@GeorgeWarwick12@TRobinsonNewEra ‘Roman numerals for three continue to assume that the Bulgarian man and woman,(no space) who have been convicted, were the ones at the scene of the video.’
Now;
Why the mistakes, are you anxious or just prone to errors. Did you mean video, or crime?
@Marb82Les@GeorgeWarwick12@TRobinsonNewEra Nobody is going to believe that - you’re telling me after eight months a memory popped into your head and there I was. Just be honest.
Again, it’s a different case. Again, there were more parties charged. So again, you weren’t correct.