Xavida

Afghanistan zindabad🏳️

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@jahanzebwesa @SR_Afghanistan @wphfund @forum_asia @jk_rowling @TRobinsonNewEra @naomirwolf @WRNAfghanistan @NuriaCSopena @nurygglez @ZiauddinY Fake news

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Has Saudi ever supported global Muslim unity?

During World War I, Indian Muslims and even Indian Hindus opposed the British destruction of the Ottoman Caliphate.

At this time, the existence of a global Muslim religious and political leader (Caliph) was seen as an essential aspect of Islam. Moreover the Ottomans were the foremost protectors of Islam.

Indian Muslim and Hindu political cooperation on this matter resulted in the Khilafat movement (1919–1924), which came to an end when the Caliphate was finally destroyed.

Meanwhile, the deviant sect of Wahhabism was uniquely hostile to the notion of global Islamic unity - far more than Hindus.

Hence, Wahhabis joined the British to destroy the Ottoman Caliphate.

A portion of Ottoman lands were transferred to Jews to establish Israel, and another portion of these lands were transferred to Wahhabis to establish the (third) modern Saudi state.

The founder of the Saudi State (Ibn Saud) agreed to have his new polity operate as a permanent protected vassal of the British and then the Americans.

He also had his Wahhabi religious establishment legitimate all of these policies - from destruction of the Ottomans to permanent vassalage under the British/Americans.

Many Muslims born in the later 20h century do not understand this dynamic. They see the Saudi state and its Wahhabi establishment as advocating global Muslim unity and cooperation.

But this is a mistake. Between the 1950s and early 2000s, the US had the Saudi state and its Wahhabi scholars mobilize Muslims against socialist/communist enemies of the US. Thus, the Wahhabis mobilized Muslims against Russian ally Gamal Abd a-Nasir in Egypt, and then against Russia in Afghanistan, in the Balkans, in Chechnya (more recently they did the same in Syria).

Some of these wars did indeed benefit Muslims (e.g., Afghanistan, Balkans), but contrary to appearances, they were never fought for the sake of global Muslim unity.

On the contrary, they were only fought to weaken enemies of the US.

Throughout this period, the US continued to hate Islam (like the British), however it simply regarded Russia and its allies as a bigger enemy.

As soon as Soviet Russia fell in the 1990s, the US quickly turned against Islam in the "Global War on Terror" after arranging a false flag attack (with Wahhabi help) on 9/11.

To this day, Wahhabis never fight Americans. Thus, Wahhabis will fight Iran and Yemen (as these are US enemies) but will not fight Israelis occupying Muslim lands (e.g., in Palestine, Syria, Lebanon).

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

The Saudi monarchy has issued a legal order to block my account in their country. 😂

Allowing Muslims in Saudi to see my content is too much of a danger for the Wahhabi terrorist regime.

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

How can it be said that Wahhabis are Sunnis when they claim:

- it is not kufr to deny the existence of an eternal hell

- it is not kufr to accuse the Prophet ﷺ of preaching shirk after being tricked by the devil

- it is not kufr to claim that the universe is eternal

- it is perfectly halal to call upon jinns for protection and aid

- that in the 18th century, Islam had been forgotten across the world and Muslims had no knowledge of tawhid, until Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab discovered the meaning of tawhid

- that Ibn Abd al-Wahhab was correct to takfir all the world's Muslims, declare jihad on them, and then massacre them in their mosques and marketplaces

- that Ibn Abd al-Wahhab was correct in claiming that all existing Muslims were worse kafirs than the Quraysh who fought the Prophet ﷺ

- that it is permissible to ally with the US, UK, and Israel to wage war on Muslims across the world as they are kafir mushriks (e.g., Saudi allying with British against Ottomans, Saudi allying with US against Iraq)

- that it is permissible to secretly agree that a Muslim country will be the permanent vassal of a kafir country (e.g., Ibn Saud's agreement that Saudi will be a permanent vassal of the British)

DOES THIS SOUND LIKE SUNNISM TO YOU?

THE WAHHABIS ARE NOT SUNNIS

They are a deviant cult that only emerged in the 18th century Najd (the horn of Satan).

They were rejected as extreme non-Sunni khariji deviants by all Muslims across the world (and in fact the Ottoman Shaykh al-Islam judged them kafirs).

This cult only gained acceptance in the early 20th century when the British created a state for them and gave them Makka and Madina.

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@shenikua @Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi Congratulating *kuffar* (disbelievers) on their *kufr* (disbelief) is, in itself, an act of *kufr*—because you are praising a *mushrik* (polytheist) for committing crimes against Allah, and you are offering them congratulations.

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi The Quran commands kindness and justice, but it does not command affirming another creed and does not cancel concern for tawhid. Therefore, your conclusion is not the direct meaning of the verses but your ideological framework, which you present as a requirement of the Quran.

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi you declare this to be his problem and a hint at religious immaturity. But the question is precisely the opposite: why do you think your understanding of “kindness” must be obligatory for a religious person?

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi a reflection of interpretation.” But your position is likewise your interpretation, and it does not become proven merely because you cited two verses.

Moreover, you shift responsibility: if a Muslim does not want to congratulate people on a religious festival,

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi They commit *kufr* (disbelief) and celebrate their *kufr*, yet pseudo-Muslims like you say to them, "Congratulations on your *kufr*."

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@Louise681145 @pROaBDUR @zoidberg2010eaf @Ambreenzaidi You are, in effect, saying to the *kafir*: "I congratulate you on your *kufr*; please, continue to engage in *kufr*." In Islam, offering congratulations is an act of worship; therefore, you cannot congratulate anyone for committing *kufr*.

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@zoidberg2010eaf @pROaBDUR @Ambreenzaidi Did the companions of Muhammad—may Allah bless him and grant him peace—behave the way you do? May Allah guide you; and if He does not guide you, then may He punish you.

[Xavida @BahirKhanSafi]

@zoidberg2010eaf @pROaBDUR @Ambreenzaidi perform acts of worship directed toward invented gods—other than Allah—and you congratulate them for this crime against God, deeming it permissible? What has become of you, O Muslims of the 21st century?