Osimhen’in pozisyonu penaltıysa, Aliti’nin Vlahovic’e yaptıkları ne?
Beşiktaş’a olunca "Avrupa standartı", onlara olunca "GS standartı"...
Tüm Türkiye’yi ağır kandırıyorlar.
Bu işin arkasındaki siyasilere söylüyorum: Size oy moy yok.
#FerhatGündoğduİstifa
🚨 RAMS PARKTA KARA GECE
Galatasaray - Göztepe maçında hakem Mehmet Türkmen Göztepe yi katlediyor olmayan faulleri çalıyor ve sonunda malum takıma golü attırdı.
#GSvGÖZ
🚨 RAMS PARKTA KARA GECE
Galatasaray - Göztepe maçında hakem Mehmet Türkmen Göztepe yi katlediyor olmayan faulleri çalıyor ve sonunda malum takıma golü attırdı.
#GSvGÖZ
İSTİFA EDESİYE KADAR SUSMUYORUZ ‼️
Bu hakemler ile bu lig bitmez ☑️☑️
Gören herkesin katılmasını rica ediyorum👀
İstifa edesiyse kadar ‘’ gündemimiz ‘’ budur. #FerhatGündoğdulstifa@TFF_Org@MHK_Resmi@OA_BAK 🎯
#GSvGÖZ
Beşiktaş Taraftarının Siniri dinmiyor.
Bir Beşiktaş Taraftarı @TFF_Org Beylerbeyi Yerleşkesi Ömünde Protestoda Bulundu.
Merkez Hakem Kurulu ❌️
Merkez Bahis Kurulu ✅️
@TFF_Org@MHK_Resmi
Dear @UEFA,
There is a serious governance, regulatory compliance and accountability issue within Turkish football that deserves your attention.
Under the regulations of the Turkish Football Federation (TFF), the Central Refereeing Committee (MHK) is required to consist of one Chairman and eight members.
However, following the resignation of two members, the MHK has reportedly continued to operate for approximately 19 months with only one Chairman and six members, while the vacant positions have remained unfilled.
The issue does not end there.
Within the MHK, the Professional Competition Executive Committee (PMİK) performs a critically important function in the appointment of referees and observers.
Under the applicable regulations, the PMİK is required to consist of three members. However, it appears to have been operating with only one person, with referee and observer appointments being made solely by the Chairman of the Committee.
This means that the issue is no longer simply about vacant positions within administrative bodies.
We are talking about referee and observer appointments that directly affect professional football competitions being carried out by a single individual, despite the regulations providing for a three-member committee.
This raises a fundamental question:
Who is responsible for ensuring that the TFF and its bodies operate in accordance with their own regulations?
The Turkish Ministry of Youth and Sports states that, due to the autonomous status of the TFF, it has no hierarchical authority to intervene in the Federation’s internal governance.
At the same time, the TFF’s position is that it does not have the authority to remove the MHK administration.
This creates a serious accountability gap:
• The State does not intervene because the football federation is autonomous.
• The Federation states that it does not have the authority to remove/intervene in the MHK administration.
• The MHK has continued to operate for an extended period with fewer members than prescribed by its own regulations.
• The PMİK, although prescribed as a three-member committee, appears to be operating with only one person, while referee and observer appointments are being made within this structure.
This is not a complaint about individual refereeing decisions.
This is a matter of governance, regulatory compliance, the institutional integrity of the refereeing system and accountability within a UEFA Member Association.
I therefore respectfully ask @UEFA:
Does UEFA consider it compatible with the governance and institutional integrity standards expected of its Member Associations for a Central Refereeing Committee to operate for approximately 19 months with fewer members than prescribed by its own regulations, while a three-member body responsible for referee and observer appointments effectively operates through a single individual?
And, more importantly:
If the State cannot intervene because the TFF is autonomous, and the TFF itself claims that it has no authority to intervene in its own refereeing body, then who is responsible for ensuring that these institutions comply with their own regulations?
The autonomy of football is essential.
But autonomy must not mean the absence of oversight.
Autonomy must also come with accountability and an obligation for football institutions to comply with the rules they themselves establish.
I respectfully invite @UEFA to examine this matter.
@TFF_Org@MHK_Resmi
Dear @UEFA,
There is a serious governance, regulatory compliance and accountability issue within Turkish football that deserves your attention.
Under the regulations of the Turkish Football Federation (TFF), the Central Refereeing Committee (MHK) is required to consist of one Chairman and eight members.
However, following the resignation of two members, the MHK has reportedly continued to operate for approximately 19 months with only one Chairman and six members, while the vacant positions have remained unfilled.
The issue does not end there.
Within the MHK, the Professional Competition Executive Committee (PMİK) performs a critically important function in the appointment of referees and observers.
Under the applicable regulations, the PMİK is required to consist of three members. However, it appears to have been operating with only one person, with referee and observer appointments being made solely by the Chairman of the Committee.
This means that the issue is no longer simply about vacant positions within administrative bodies.
We are talking about referee and observer appointments that directly affect professional football competitions being carried out by a single individual, despite the regulations providing for a three-member committee.
This raises a fundamental question:
Who is responsible for ensuring that the TFF and its bodies operate in accordance with their own regulations?
The Turkish Ministry of Youth and Sports states that, due to the autonomous status of the TFF, it has no hierarchical authority to intervene in the Federation’s internal governance.
At the same time, the TFF’s position is that it does not have the authority to remove the MHK administration.
This creates a serious accountability gap:
• The State does not intervene because the football federation is autonomous.
• The Federation states that it does not have the authority to remove/intervene in the MHK administration.
• The MHK has continued to operate for an extended period with fewer members than prescribed by its own regulations.
• The PMİK, although prescribed as a three-member committee, appears to be operating with only one person, while referee and observer appointments are being made within this structure.
This is not a complaint about individual refereeing decisions.
This is a matter of governance, regulatory compliance, the institutional integrity of the refereeing system and accountability within a UEFA Member Association.
I therefore respectfully ask @UEFA:
Does UEFA consider it compatible with the governance and institutional integrity standards expected of its Member Associations for a Central Refereeing Committee to operate for approximately 19 months with fewer members than prescribed by its own regulations, while a three-member body responsible for referee and observer appointments effectively operates through a single individual?
And, more importantly:
If the State cannot intervene because the TFF is autonomous, and the TFF itself claims that it has no authority to intervene in its own refereeing body, then who is responsible for ensuring that these institutions comply with their own regulations?
The autonomy of football is essential.
But autonomy must not mean the absence of oversight.
Autonomy must also come with accountability and an obligation for football institutions to comply with the rules they themselves establish.
I respectfully invite @UEFA to examine this matter.
@TFF_Org@MHK_Resmi
Beşiktaş’ın rakibi Omonia: Türk dostu Rum takımı
📍Beşiktaş’ın UEFA Avrupa Ligi’nde karşılaşacağı Kıbrıs Rum takımı Omonia, Türk dostu olarak biliniyor. Kıbrıslı Türkler arasında en fazla sempati duyulan takımlardan biri.
Omonia’nın taraftar grubu, tribünlerde zaman zaman Türkiye ve KKTC bayrakları açıyor, Yunan bayrakları yakıyor.
Rakip takım taraftarları maçlarda Omonia taraftarlarına sık sık “Türkler” sloganları atıyor.
Omonia, Rum milliyetçi kesimin tüm saldırılarına rağmen uzun yıllar sonra kadrosuna da bir Kıbrıslı Türk futbolcu katmıştı.
Kıbrıslı Türk Tahsin Özler, Omonia forması giymişti.
Hayırdır @TFF_Org
Hayırdır..
Asgari ücretin 28.075 TL
Oldugu memlekette bu cezalar ne ?
İnsanlar maaşından arttırarak maça
geliyor haraç mi kesiyorsunuz..
Başkan Adalı’ya 15 gün ceza…
Beşiktaş Kulübü'ne 3,5 Milyon TL
Serdal Adalı'ya 15 gün hak mahrumiyeti
Hakan Daltaban'a 20 gün hak mahrumiyeti ve 2,5 Milyon TL
Tüm Beşiktaş taraftarları bu sene
Bu harami düzenine karşı birlik olmalı...
#FerhatGündoğduİstifa
#Beşiktaş
@MHK_Resmi@TFF_Org