@sircalebhammer It's Cramer. I thought it was pretty well established at this point that the smart money it to take the opposite position on whatever he says. According to Inverse Cramer, the smart move is to reinstate Jensen ASAP!
@TDHBXG Men have been doing our best to give women what they wanted my whole life, and women have just become more miserable and venomous. The experiment would be standing up to women and saying no at this point.
@ShamashAran They didn't do it before because it might help Trump. Now that the Democrats are finally taking over they're taking some steps to cover their own asses for when the time comes.
@bennyjohnson Never happen. The GOP fought too hard to bury the SAVE act. Even if they're willing to pass some things to look good now that they've successfully hamstrung Trump, the SAVE act will not be one of them.
@knnoxfiles Like he said, even if she takes it all it's not going to hurt him, so why not do it? Dude sounds like a good guy, and he felt she was worth it. Sounds like he was right so far, doesn't it?
@MurrayHillGuy1 Non exclusive means non serious. Dude should go for it just to see what happens! If things fall apart it's not a big loss, and there's some potential for real entertainment with this one.
@Bitcoingo2zero@RetardDecoder I'm not saying there wasn't cheating. I'm just saying that's not the whole story. DataRepublican had some things to say on this issue that you might want to look at.
@Shadeycat248@Lawrenc23954038@kangminlee The disagreement part is that many conservatives consider it a bad thing to indulge in, like drugs and gambling. No one's making it an identity thing on the right, which is why no one cares that Scott Bessent is gay. People on the right can disagree and still respect other people
@mattvanswol No, you're right. It's amazed me for decades that people will keep reelecting these people. At least with Democrats they'll put some effort into doing what they say they want to do!