Barbie Puckett

Daughter of the King, cherished bride, mother of 2 awesome grown kids, 2 g babies 1 on the way❣

[Barbie Puckett @BarbiePuckett]

@MAGAResource 👍🏼

[Barbie Puckett @BarbiePuckett]

@JDVanceNewsX Yes

[Barbie Puckett @BarbiePuckett]

@JDVanceNewsX A. Yes

[Barbie Puckett @BarbiePuckett]

@JDVanceNewsX Yes

[Died Suddenly @DiedSuddenly_]

The collapsed news anchor footage from this morning is horrifying.

[Hodgetwins @hodgetwins]

We just found out that our own govt. murdered a sitting US President in the 60’s and it barely made headlines 🤯

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

36.Twitter files continued:
"THE FIRST AMENDMENT ISN’T ABSOLUTE”
Szabo’s letter contains chilling passages relaying Democratic lawmakers’ attitudes. They want “more” moderation, and as for the Bill of Rights, it's "not absolute"

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

35.Szabo reports to Twitter that some Hill figures are characterizing the laptop story as “tech’s Access Hollywood moment”:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

34.NetChoice lets Twitter know a “blood bath” awaits in upcoming Hill hearings, with members saying it's a "tipping point," complaining tech has “grown so big that they can’t even regulate themselves, so government may need to intervene.”

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

33.Within a day, head of Public Policy Lauren Culbertson receives a ghastly letter/report from Carl Szabo of the research firm NetChoice, which had already polled 12 members of congress – 9 Rs and 3 Democrats, from “the House Judiciary Committee to Rep. Judy Chu’s office.”

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

32.Khanna tries to reroute the conversation to the First Amendment, mention of which is generally hard to find in the files:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

Gadde replies quickly, immediately diving into the weeds of Twitter policy, unaware Khanna is more worried about the Bill of Rights:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

30. In one humorous exchange on day 1, Democratic congressman Ro Khanna reaches out to Gadde to gently suggest she hop on the phone to talk about the “backlash re speech.” Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern.

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

29. A fundamental problem with tech companies and content moderation: many people in charge of speech know/care little about speech, and have to be told the basics by outsiders. To wit:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

28. To which former Deputy General Counsel Jim Baker again seems to advise staying the non-course, because “caution is warranted”:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

27. Former VP of Global Comms Brandon Borrman asks, “Can we truthfully claim that this is part of the policy?”

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

26. By this point “everyone knew this was fucked,” said one former employee, but the response was essentially to err on the side of… continuing to err.

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

https://t.co/j4EeXEAw6F can see the confusion in the following lengthy exchange, which ends up including Gadde and former Trust and safety chief Yoel Roth. Comms official Trenton Kennedy writes, “I'm struggling to understand the policy basis for marking this as unsafe”:

[Matt Taibbi @mtaibbi]

24. “They just freelanced it,” is how one former employee characterized the decision. “Hacking was the excuse, but within a few hours, pretty much everyone realized that wasn’t going to hold. But no one had the guts to reverse it.���