Some self-proclaimed “Punjab experts” on X Spaces claim to speak for Punjabi Hindus who blame BJP and Modi for everything, yet many have taken American or European citizenship, or Canadian PR/citizenship, while continuing to monetize Punjab-related narratives through organizations with vested interests abroad or political parties like INC and AAP in India.
If they’re genuinely concerned about Punjab, why did they give up Indian citizenship? Why were they nowhere to be seen on the ground during the 2017, 2022, or 2024 elections?
Hopefully, they’ll finally show up for the 2027 elections, not just on X Spaces, but in Punjab itself, to strengthen the cause of Punjabi Hindus.
Hey @StealthMedical1 sorry to bust your anti indian narrative….
But thatz the truth! So stop talking about INDIA like you know it or atleast read before talking
One underrated feature of democracy:
Every citizen gets a vote.
One unfortunate side effect:
Every half baked opinion arrives with absolute confidence. 😭😭
There’s no mention of space or a space host at all. That’s entirely your assumption. You should be aware that making assumptions is a horrible habit.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
- Dr. Gobhi Krishak
The #Khalistan movement originated in the 1940s and 1950s but officially erupted into a major political and trrist campaign during the 1970s and 1980s - Government in Power - @INCIndia
Operation Blue Star was conducted when the then PM (Indira Gandhi) realised that she has raised a Fr@nkenstein's Monster in Jarnail Singh Bhindranwala (Government in Power - @INCIndia)
Sequence of events on which the movie Sutlej is based on - alleged extra judicial ki!!ings of 1995 & the life of Jaswant Singh Kalra - Government in Power - @INCIndia (Both State and Center)
Considering all of this, why isn't @BJP4India using this movie as a narrative to show how the INC stooges have wronged the state of Punjab?
@narendramodi ji and @amitshah ji, I am not sure who's advising you, but the ban on Sutlej is causing more harm on the ground as people see this as a weak move.
The IT cell could have been used to showcase how the previous rulers were detrimental for Punjab. Instead, people are busy defending the ban.
Please introspect and get into a course correction mode.
In that period we had a Congress government at centre & in Punjab state.
#SatlujMovie
The funniest part is pretending the objection is “women making money.”
If that were true, the same people would celebrate women becoming scientists, CEOs, judges & entrepreneurs with equal enthusiasm.
The criticism isn’t about women earning. It’s about turning sexuality into a business model & then demanding immunity from criticism because money is involved.
Calling every objection “misogyny” is intellectual laziness. If objectification suddenly becomes empowerment the moment it pays well then the principle was never dignity
IT WAS PROFIT.
Men actually never had any issue with objectification of women as long as they were the only ones benefiting or making money from it. But now they have an issue coz women are also making money from it. So the issue for misogynists is not objectification of women, but women benefiting from it.
Exactly The goal isn’t to decide who to trust it’s to learn how to evaluate what they’re saying.
Whether it’s a philosopher, a self proclaimed guru, a lawyer, an economist, a feminist, or MRA or a politician nobody deserves blind faith. Listen to everyone, verify the facts, question the logic, and make up your own mind. The strongest opinions are those that can survive scrutiny not just applause.
I don't need a perfect past.
I need the courage to stand by it.
Every decision right or wrong belongs to me.
That's the price of freedom.
Because once you own everything you've done no one else can use it to control you.
There are concerns about E20 fuel, but spreading rumours about new cars is misleading. Yesterday, I pointed out that Manish Kashyap was misrepresenting the issue, as Toyota's manual clearly states that his car is E20-compliant. Today, Toyota issued an official clarification confirming this.
Choose always the right people to amplify your cause.
Which government hospital is handing interns a ‘10×10 flat’ ??
And if it’s really 10×10 where did the kitchen and washroom magically appear ??
This is the kind of low effort fiction that survives only because Twitter rewards emotional bait over basic fact checking. Every detail screams made up yet thousands are busy applauding it because it fits their preferred narrative.
Ragebaiters like this aren’t storytellers they’re attention addicts.
And the bigger joke is the crowd treating obvious fiction like sworn testimony.
Got rejected by a girl I went to see for an arranged marriage. They asked me what I do, whether I own a house in a city, and for my salary slip. I told them I’m an intern doctor at a govt hospital, making ₹144K per annum, and living in a 10×10 room provided by the govt. They weren’t satisfied with my income because the girl earns ₹18 LPA, and they’re looking for someone who owns a house, a car, and earns ₹45 LPA. It’s over for me.
With respect, this framing is constitutionally incomplete.
The Constitution protects free speech under Article 19(1)(a) and peaceful assembly under Article 19(1)(b), but neither right is absolute. Articles 19(2) and 19(3) expressly permit reasonable restrictions in the interests of public order, sovereignty, integrity of India and other constitutional grounds.
The Constitution also doesn’t speak only of rights. Part IV-A (Article 51A) imposes Fundamental Duties upon every citizen including abiding by the Constitution, respecting public property, promoting harmony and safeguarding national unity.
No democracy can function on the theory that “protest” automatically immunizes every act done in its name. If a protest remains peaceful and lawful, the State must protect it. If it violates valid statutory restrictions, blocks public order, or crosses into unlawful conduct, the State is equally duty-bound to enforce the law.
The real constitutional question is not whether citizens may protest, but whether the restrictions imposed satisfy the test of legality, necessity and proportionality. Rights and duties coexist elevating one while ignoring the other risks weakening the constitutional balance.
A republic governed only by rights without corresponding duties doesn’t move toward liberty it risks drifting toward disorder.
"All citizens are being made slaves of Indian Government. They cannot stage protests, they cannot agitate-What is all this? Now so many papers have been leaked. If people protest, you will slap cases... What is this? It is the right of the citizens to protest.
The petitioner has just raised slogans like 'BJP Government Murdabad', 'Amit Shah Murdabad'... Why citizens can't raise such slogans? Why externment orders for such slogans?" - Bombay High Court Judge Justice Madhav Jamdar asks.