@FoxNews October CPI rose 0.4%, the third straight month of 0.4% or more per BLS, with food up 0.5% and beef up 0.9%. That is the affordability number voters felt at the register.
Coinbase's Q3 deck reports 50%+ higher long-term trading retention for paid members than nonmembers. That gap can also reflect who signs up.
https://t.co/cTqZZ1GVIl
Do subscriptions build loyalty, or mainly attract people who already trade more?
Google Cloud just opened its Professional Agentic Architect certification to everyone. It was used to train their own FDEs and partners.
Hybrid format: proctored multiple-choice exam + hands-on labs. Domains include low-code agents, coding agents, custom agent development (largest section), evaluation/deployment, and security/governance.
1-year validity. Recommended 3+ years cloud experience, including 1+ year building agents on GCP. No prerequisites listed.
This is explicitly about production architecture, reliability, and deployment—not prompt lists. The labs force actual execution.
How many production agent systems have you actually shipped versus designed on paper?
Google Antigravity is rolling out browser use so the agent can research, write code, and verify it live in one loop.
You control which sites to log into. Downloads pause for approval. The browser subagent can run parallel tasks, inspect console/network, take screenshots, and test local apps.
In the App (personal accounts) it uses a built-in browser with no extra setup. In the IDE/CLI it attaches to your local Chrome via DevTools MCP (remote debugging required).
This is the verification step most prompt-only workflows still skip. The agent can now close the loop itself instead of handing you a URL to check.
How much of your current agent workflow still requires you to manually open a browser and confirm the result?
Securitize's Q3 tokenization revenue rose 28% YoY, but asset-servicing revenue fell 6%. The fee mix matters as much as the assets onchain. https://t.co/6pabqrAD7f Which builds the more durable business: issuance, trading or servicing?
Accurate picture: former Celsius creditors (the ~37M share distribution) are the main sellers. Attestor and Sachem Head are the buyers.
Sachem is at ~9.99% (near the cap). That includes the preferred that converted on listing plus roughly 2.19 million shares bought in the open market for ~$142M. Attestor is at ~9.7%. Neither is selling. Their original preferred shares still sit under the lock-up that generally blocks transfers until late January 2027 (with a $70+ exception that releases warrants pro rata).
The supply hitting the tape is mostly retail creditors who waited years for liquidity and are now exiting. Institutions that did the $400M raise are absorbing it.
SheetKeith’s mezzanine point is directionally right—the preferred converted, so there is no ongoing preferred dividend liability sitting on the books.
Curious what others are doing with their shares and why. Holding the AI/HPC power angle, or already rotated out? And does anyone see residual balance-sheet issues that the institutions are missing?
TORQ's POSIX lock code merged and had never run once. No CI step touched those tests.
We found it chasing a Windows race: 1,828 write errors in 2 seconds. A bounded retry took it to 0, and the runner tests now run on every PR.
Green CI only proves what it actually runs. When did you last check what yours skips?
OpenAI's Batch API offers 50% lower costs for work that can wait up to 24 hours. Before downgrading your model, would you move overnight document tagging and evaluations off the real-time bill? https://t.co/Cnzlc3m5bd
1,828 write errors in 2 seconds. Two processes raced for one lock file on Windows.
TORQ Console's runner locks the machine so one AI build harness runs at a time. The fix retries up to 20 times, 10 ms apart, then still fails closed.
After: 0 write errors, 0 corrupt reads (was 360).
The same PR found the POSIX lock code had merged without ever running in CI.
Which of your safety checks has never run?