Senseseer

Io sono il villaggio idiota. God gave me good hair and nice feet. Everything in between, I have to work on. DMs ignored. I’m also going blind so excuse my typos

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

https://t.co/Dt9cxU7oCH

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@EarthtoTami It would not be surprising if he is getting paid to do all this extra effort.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@paulsaladinomd If only they required workers to use actual hygiene practices and provide porta potties, toilet paper and soap. Where the F is MAHA and Kennedy?

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@WWG1WGA_QQ I’m sure the superhero vision will be tied to a subscription 😂

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@ValerieAnne1970 Of course. As long as they can exempt themselves, they will go along with anything and even be rewarded for it. We have one big uniparty.

[Suneel Dhand MD @DrSuneelDhand]

NEW CHOLESTEROL GUIDELINES issued by US authorities are very concerning, because they could put up to 30 million more people on statins, many of them under age 40.

We have many worries about this as doctors, including:

1. The true efficacy of “fixing a number”, an obsession sadly of modern medicine

2. Actual statistical benefits versus the risk of significant side effects

3. A lack of focus on root cause

Here’s our latest podcast discussing these important issues: https://t.co/7ZVoZrdeTT

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

This is EXACTLY what’s happening

“The political left mastered an old mass manipulation strategy that lets them push any claim, no matter how radical, wrong, or stupid, into the mainstream without ever having to defend it. And once you know it, you'll see it everywhere, even in daily arguments

It's called the motte and bailey doctrine

- The bailey is the radical, extreme version of a claim
- The motte is the small defensible tower next to it, the mild version of the claim

In the public's mind, the 2 are never actually separated. They live together as one position. So when someone attacks the bailey, the radical version, the motte gets defended instead, the reasonable version.

And because the public sees the motte and bailey as the same claim, successfully defending the motte automatically validates the bailey, too. Attacking the radical position now looks identical to attacking the reasonable one, which makes the radical position untouchable by association”

“This is how the Overton Window is moved, through hundreds of small, unwinnable fights over the motte, each one quietly making the bailey a little more acceptable, a little more mainstream, until what used to be radical is just the new normal. And from there, real political power follows”

Let me give you a real world easy to understand example of this,

Let’s take the Left’s plan to Defund the Police

- The Bailey, the radical claim: Democrats say they want to cut or abolish police departments. Reduce their funding so severely that traditional policing becomes impossible

- The Motte, the mild, defensible version: Democrats say “We just want to reallocate some money to mental health services, social workers, and community programs so the police don’t have to handle everything.”

Here’s how it works, When critics attack the radical version saying something like “You want to abolish the police and leave cities less safe”, the defenders immediately switch to the mild version “No one is saying abolish the police, we just want better resources for communities”

But in reality, they plan us to abolish the police

The Left uses this tactic ALL THE TIME

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@RenzTom And still available everywhere. And still no major mass arrests.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@Emilio2763 Well. They aren’t biologists so how would they know? Some of the players look like they don’t know either.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

It sure does seem we have plenty of compromised entities that do not promote human life and longevity. You can bet these same or similar methods are being used to mislead adults too. What is the main goal? It sure seems like the answer is a lowered human population. And creating life long patients out of those who remain.

[The Realistic Nurse @TheRealisticRN]

🚨 BREAKING: This week the American Academy of Pediatrics — the group that shapes the childhood vaccine schedule — told the country it's "neutral."

Their words: "we go by science, not politics."

So I pulled their tax records. Here's who actually pays them..

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) runs on ~$138 MILLION a year.

Its corporate "partners" — $50,000+ donors — include the vaccine makers themselves:
Pfizer, Merck, Moderna, Sanofi.

Source: their own IRS Form 990

On one AAP COVID-19 vaccine policy, the science outlet Undark found 9 of 16 committee members had taken money from vaccine manufacturers.

The published guideline said: "no potential conflicts."

9 of 16. They wrote "none."

And this isn't unique to the AAP — it's the pattern.

Peer-reviewed, JAMA Internal Medicine (2018): 57% of authors of clinical guidelines for high-revenue drugs had financial ties to the makers — and 1 in 4
payments were undisclosed.

The science documents the conflict of interest.

The AAP doesn't just take the money — it lobbies.

It keeps a full-time, four-person federal lobbying team and reported ~$789,000 in lobbying in a single quarter of 2026.

Ask why a "neutral" group of children's doctors needs its own lobby shop.

Same playbook, different drug.

AAP's 2023 childhood obesity guidelines urged doctors to consider weight-loss drugs for kids. 10 of the authors had taken money from those drug companies.

Disclosed in the guideline? No.

In 2011 the Gates Foundation paid the AAP $1,419,200 — in the Foundation's own words — "to organize and facilitate immunization education and advocacy
efforts among pediatricians."

Paid to advocate.

Why it matters: in 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits.

Since then a federal program has paid ~$5.5 BILLION for vaccine injuries (HRSA).

The makers are protected. The group promoting the schedule takes their money.

The question every parent deserves answered: is the group that calls itself "neutral" being paid by the companies that profit from the schedule?

The documents say yes.

If you want the documents mainstream accounts won't show you, follow
@therealisticrn.

I'm a nurse. I bring receipts, not fear.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@ShiningScience Humans are a speck on this planet. This study is false. CO2 makes plants thrive. Then they release oxygen. Plant more.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@ValerieAnne1970 Exactly. It was intentional. With a purpose against humanity. Therefore, a crime. Many of them left their positions shortly after the main mission was complete. When. Will. There Be. Justice!!??!?

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@WallStreetApes Don’t worry. He allowed plenty of windmills and solar farms for backup.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@WallStreetMav He must be picking up some to pay Fauci for his latest committee performance.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@GinaSaysSo So this must mean there weren’t any laws on the books previously to punish those who tamper with elections? I don’t buy that. No matter what passes, it does no good if there is minimal to no enforcement.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@elonmusk I’ll be paying for my ticket with the high basic income you say we will all be making once the robots do everything.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

I do. Years ago I was driving down the road after dark and came up on six horses that had gotten loose and were in a full gallop. I literally corralled them to the side of the road and got them to stop. 😂. I’m not sure what happened after that. I drove off and flashed my lights to warn oncoming traffic.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

Anything and everything was being called crowvid. False positives from a faulty testing method, asymptomatic lies and incentivized healthcare facilities were used to boost the numbers. Recovery remained constant at 99 plus percent for most people. The flu can be very similar. All set in motion to then sell the “cure.”

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@ValerieAnne1970 He should give his patients the bribes he received for selling this product.

[Senseseer @BDav5309]

@WallStreetApes After having a couple bad experiences, I quit buying tools on Azn. And their ratings are often bogus too in ways that inflate the true rating