@koremasa21022@Opendoor And if it were the other way around, you’d probably frame that as good too. Right?
Can we talk about the cult mentality in Open Army and how it actually just serves Opendoor, at your expense?
@RealOpenArmy “Goes through” is doing a lot of work. More like, “is asking for an offer number because it’s a useful benchmark when selling” — and it used to be higher than 1 in 5, so that’s a regression
@jeffye888 A better analogy is that it’s like saying buying a used car at a dealership is worse economics. You are paying 15%+ more for certainty and convenience. If you’re someone who can use carfax, conduct a tx, arrange for a mechanic pre-inspection — you’re burning $ at a dealer
@HamedBarkh@nejatian FYI, Opendoor has been using "AI" (machine learning) for ages, in boring ways. Now probably using it to code like every other tech company. It's not special. The way Kaz talks about it is pure hype for the bagholder army.
@jeffye888 Can you explain why one can come to any conclusions here that aren’t just “the market has changed” — seems like there’s a fallacy in your logic
@Yazaq97@fayaze6@nejatian I don't know if you had been paying attention much pre-Kaz, but it was the same promises for years (service attach, marketplace, mortgage, etc). None of it matters — the business model is doomed to be low margin and the tokenization is an unproven pipe dream.
@bitcoindata21 I would argue this gap isn't relevant. The gap between $IGV and nasdaq is relevant, and Bitcoin will follow $IGV. But a gap doesn't close just because it's a gap; we need to understand what would cause $IGV to catch up and what headwinds there are.
@morganb@letsgometsnjets@Opendoor_God@nejatian Morgan, the bagholder “army” has unrealistic expectations about what you can achieve — and in what amount of time — because you guys spend half your time hyping on X.