I’m sorry
I don’t care how many “experts” say the PRC wasn’t successful in interfering in our elections
I know what my own eyes are telling me, and I’ve learned to trust those more than any expert opinion
And 1 in 2116 had an excess sudden or unexpected death compared to the placebo group.
This was dismissed because all cause mortality was not so bad.
In the meantime, a claim of a reduction of 4 hospitalisations counted as benefit with no check of all cause hospitalisations.
Huge kudos to Jay Bhattacharya for how calmly he dealt with this absolutely loathsome fake news operative. She really is one of the worst.
First, when Islamist or other mass shooters leave behind extensive records explaining their motives, those records are immediately buried and we are told their motives will never be known. Yet here, where the shooter left no manifesto explaining his actions, we are confidently informed that he was motivated by “misinformation.”
Second, as even the fake news operative acknowledges, the shooter had serious mental health problems. Yet somehow the blame is shifted away from the fact that he was severely mentally ill and onto “misinformation.”
It is sickening to watch the narrative being twisted this way. You can see and hear how angry Dr Bhattacharya is at the lies and false narratives being pushed at him, but he never loses his composure. He simply keeps dismantling the premise, calmly and methodically, without allowing himself to be dragged into the grotesque framing she is trying to impose.
Moderna's latest mRNA flu 💉had 29 sudden or unexpected deaths in mRNA group (0 autopsies) vs 12 in alt 💉group.
If trial was set up to show sudden deaths⏫it would be presented as statistically significant with a
142% increase in risk
&
~ excess of 1 per 2116 people.
FDA:
NEW --
The Canadian charged with espionage at NATO HQ
had her job applications released in court
and she listed that she was an an "ELECTION CAMPAIGN worker for Liberal Party of Canada"
-National Post.
To be clear the 1 in 2116 risk of excess sudden death ought to be set against the benefit of the latest mRNA miracle.
There were 4 fewer flu hospitalisations which works out at a 1 in 5,000 chance of avoiding a hospital admission.
No-one would consent if told.
“He said he learned of a further mechanism only afterward, from the federal lawyers. A radio station, he said, had been established in Washington State, outside the jurisdiction of the CRTC, and used against him.”
Our work. Very good, everyone.
You thought Fauci’s diary was bad? Just wait for his iPhone messages. You’re about to see how evil, sick, and fully coordinated the legacy media was in protecting the narrative during Covid.
Throwback to Jimmy Kimmel calling for the unvaccinated to be denied medical treatment at hospitals.
One of the more revealing moments of the COVID era.
"VACCINATING ONE GROUP PRIMARILY TO PROTECT ANOTHER IS PROBLEMATIC."
If some people can't benefit then the risk / benefit ratio is tipped towards risk.
It is unethical to put people at risk to benefit others.
That is sacrifice of a minority.
First, do no harm.