@tanya_plibersek Personally? I think many people would like to have seen the question of recognition and executive advisory body decoupled and two questions asked. Statement of recognition in the constitution? Sure. Advisory body to the executive via constitution? Hm.
@SkyNewsAust I still think a few people would prefer the ideas decoupled. Many would agree on a recognition statement in the constitution. Some remain less sure on the advisory to the executive. Two questions, not one.
https://t.co/EHJSd6KywK As has often been the case with this current issue, there's a definite talking point buried in here somewhere, but most are seemingly too partisan to properly discuss it. #VoiceToParliament#IndigenousRecognition
https://t.co/OYdpL7NKXP Seriously @rogerwaters@davidgilmour@PollySamson can we bury the proverbial like adults? Putin provoked? Maybe. Invading Ukraine still wrong. Waters steered @pinkfloyd in 70s heyday? Maybe. Still wouldn't have been towering success w/o Dave, Nick + Rick.