@bethTmufc Neves chose PSG, Grealish chose City, Spurs weren’t willing to sell domestically.
How about when we did anything we can to pay for Sancho, Antony, and Alexis Sanchez?
@SwedishRumble Nasdaq is the better pure investment, but United is the better family asset.
Selling means taxes + losing control, scarcity value, and stable private collateral. Ineos let the Glazers cash out partially, keep upside, and have someone else’s investment provide them material gains.
@terryflewers@business@terryflewers When the sale news came around last time we were told that in order for any member to sell their shares outside the family it has to be approved by the whole family. This is likely a non-story.
@FTFonFS1@getnickwright Hockey resolved this issue by having embellishment calls. Soccer a yellow card. No reason the NBA can’t resolve this by giving a player an offensive foul.
@adysmit09758632@AcademyScoop I’ve also been thinking that if they are committed to the 150m spend then we end up with those 3. But if it’s true that Ugarte is staying than maybe that gets condensed to 2 midfielders.
@StretfordEndRe2@UtdXclusive I guess, but I consider it similar to Madrid buying Endrick or Chelsea buying Estevao. It’s a difference between what happens on the books and the actual reality, why give Ineos credit for last year’s work (not that Leon changes the grade much one way or the other)