Zowel Nadia Moussaid als Natasja Gibs noemden, naast elkaar aan tafel als duo-presentatie van de talkshow Op1, Israël een 'apartheidsstaat'. Dat is een - makkelijk aantoonbare - flagrante leugen, fake nieuws en een schending van de journalistieke normen:
Persoonlijk dacht ik altijd dat @MinPres een etalagepop was, maar @jndkgrf heeft me de ogen geopend.
Hij is Ken! Van Barbie!
Een overgepolijst knappe pop zonder emotie of aantrekkelijkheid. Een soort accessoire, aangeschaft om een rol te vervullen.
https://t.co/is2QgyeCSu
Dit had je van tevoren kunnen verwachten. De zon is geen stabiele energieleverancier. Vooral in Nederland niet.
Mensen gebruiken op piekmomenten stroom en dan gaat de zon echt niet precies harder schijnen.
Richt je op stabiele kernenergie in Nederland.
https://t.co/WIEOFyLlPa
AS THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES ARE OUT IN FULL FORCE FOR THE 25th ANNIVERSARY OF 9/11
All 19 of the 9/11 hijackers were Muslims — all Islamist Muslims — from Middle Eastern countries.
Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda openly claimed and celebrated the mass murder of nearly 3,000 civilians. That is the documented record, not a “narrative.”
These were not “militants,” “freedom fighters,” or “people with grievances.” They were Islamist terrorists, just like Hamas, Hezbollah, IRGC, etc., who weaponized passenger jets to slaughter Americans in the name of their ideology. Bin Laden did not distance himself; he bragged about it. The perpetrators were selected, trained, and dispatched by a jihadist network that explicitly framed the attack as religious warfare against the West and “infidels.”
Any attempt to blur those facts by soft pedaling the religious identity of the attackers, treating bin Laden’s celebration as irrelevant, or shifting focus to unrelated geopolitical complaints… is evasion. The men who flew the planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon, and a Pennsylvania field were Muslims acting on Islamist doctrine, and their leader claimed the victory. That is what happened.
A picture a day before 9/11
Als etnische zuivering illegaal is – en dat is ze ook – kan het internationaal recht niet eisen dat de gevolgen van die zuivering in stand worden gehouden.
En dat is precies waar landen als het Verenigd Koninkrijk en andere landen Israël toe proberen te dwingen: het in stand houden van het resultaat van de etnische zuivering van Joden door Jordanië.
Israeli Settlements Are the Remedy for Jordan’s Ethnic Cleansing of Jews , Not the Crime
◾️If ethnic cleansing is illegal,and it is, international law cannot require that the cleansing be kept in place.
◾️And that is exactly what countries like the UK and others are trying to pressure Israel to do
A small addition of mine to the great article in the @spectator from the brilliant @HausdorffMedia
Before 1948 there were Jewish communities across Judea, Samaria and the Old City of Jerusalem. In 1948 those communities were destroyed or emptied. The Jewish Quarter was cleared of Jews. Gush Etzion was overrun and its people killed or taken prisoner. Under Jordanian rule Jews were barred from living in those areas, barred from the Western Wall, and blocked by law from buying property. Synagogues and graves were wrecked.
By 1967 the land was Jew-free because Jews had been ethnically cleansed from it and kept out. Jordan occupied that land. That conduct broke the basic rules of occupation. Article 49(1) of the Fourth Geneva Convention forbids individual or mass forcible transfers and deportations of protected persons from occupied territory. Hague Regulations Articles 46 and 47 require respect for family rights, lives and private property and forbid pillage. Geneva Convention Article 53 forbids destruction of property in occupied territory except where rendered absolutely necessary by military operations. Geneva Convention Article 27 requires respect for the person, honour, family rights and religious convictions of protected persons.
Emptying Jewish Jerusalem and Gush Etzion, wrecking synagogues and graves, and locking Jews out for 19 years is the opposite of those duties.That is ethnic cleansing. It fits the definition of crimes against humanity: deportation or forcible transfer of population, and persecution on ethnic or religious grounds, as later stated in Rome Statute Articles 7(1)(d) and 7(1)(h), and as already recognised in the Nuremberg Charter, Article 6(c).
Jewish settlement after 1967 is not the implanting of a foreign population into someone else’s country. It is the return of a people to places from which they were expelled.
Article 49(6) of the Fourth Geneva Convention bars an occupying power from transferring parts of its own civilian population into occupied territory. It was written against state-organised population implants, not against Jews going back to Hebron, Gush Etzion or the Old City after they had been driven out.
The right to return to one’s own country is stated in UDHR Article 13(2) and ICCPR Article 12(4). ICCPR Articles 12 and 26 protect freedom to choose residence and equal protection of the law. A rule that Jews may not live in those places because they are Jews fails those provisions.A ban on those settlements does not merely regulate Israel. It treats Jordan’s ethnically cleansed map as the lawful baseline.
ILC Articles on State Responsibility, Article 41, require states not to recognise as lawful a situation created by a serious breach of a peremptory norm, and not to aid in maintaining that situation. UN Charter Article 2(4) forbids acquisition of territory by force; the fruits of such a seizure are not a title the world is bound to conserve. Preserving a Jew-free Hebron and Old City is recognition of the result of the ethnic cleansing by Jordan.
That conflicts with the ban on deportation, the ban on destruction and demographic erasure under occupation, the duty not to recognise the fruits of a serious breach, and equal treatment of expelled peoples.
If ethnic cleansing is illegal,and it is, international law cannot require that the cleansing be kept in place.
And that is exactly what countries like the Uk and others are trying to pressure Israel to do
To keep the result of ethnic cleansing of jews by Jordan intact.
🚨 BREAKING: Tens of billions of dollars of the Iranian regime's investments blown up an hour ago.
Israel used over 1,100 tons of explosives to destroy the Ali Taher ridge tunnels, built for Hezbollah over the past two decades.
Here's the full legal & historical analysis of the "West Bank" that Britain would like you to ignore.
They're sanctioning Jews for living in the Land where they were required to "encourage ... close settlement by Jews" via the Mandate for Palestine, unanimously granted via international treaty by the League of Nations.
The Land has been Judea and Samaria for three millennia. The term "West Bank" does not appear in any documents anywhere until 1950. When it was under Arab control for 19 years, it was illegally annexed by Jordan. There has never been a Palestinian Arab state in the history of planet earth.
The only reason no Jews were living there after 1948 is because they were ethnically cleansed (literally, every one of them killed or expelled) by the British-officer-led and British-armed Jordanian Arab Legion.
That's just a taste. Want to know the real history along with a complete legal analysis? Read my article below.
In een rechtsstaat hoort de volgorde niet onderhandelbaar te zijn: eerst feiten, dan conclusies en pas daarna een oordeel. Niet andersom.
Wat vaststaat, moeten we benoemen.
Wat wordt betwist, moeten we als betwist beschrijven.
En over wat we niet weten, moeten we de intellectuele eerlijkheid hebben te zeggen: dat weten we nog niet.
De linkse Israëlische krant Haaretz meldt in verkiezingstijd dat Netanyahu vóór 7 oktober 2023 een signaal zou hebben ontvangen van de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten over een dreigende aanval van Hamas. Tja, voor het oordeel valt, eerst het bewijs op tafel.
Lees de column van Shanna Vink op OpinieZ.
https://t.co/mhVR3S5uqh
Eén plaatje zegt meer dan 1000 pagina's beleidsnota: hoe Nederlandse scholieren in twintig jaar zijn afgezakt van de kopgroep naar de staart van het OECD-peloton. Trek vooral nog een blik pedagogen open!
The seven feasts and what each points to:
Spring - fulfilled:
1. Passover - He died as the Lamb, on the day the lambs were killed
2. Unleavened Bread - the sinless one buried, during the feast of no leaven
3. Firstfruits - He rose on the morning of the first sheaf; the guarantee of the harvest
4. Pentecost - the Spirit given on the day of the law; 3,000 died at Sinai, 3,000 saved in Jerusalem
Summer - the growing season. Where we are now.
Autumn - still ahead:
5. Trumpets - the return, "at the last trumpet"
6. Atonement - the sacrifice finished; a people yet to look on Him whom they pierced
7. Tabernacles - God dwelling with His people, permanently
Four appointments kept. Three on the calendar.
“Hey professor, you can’t hide! You’ve committed genocide!”
Dat is het geschreeuw dat de erudiete en genuanceerde @simon_schama moet aanhoren op de uni.
Een Brits Joodse historicus, geen Israeli, die persoonlijk wordt aangepakt.
Antisemitisch, anti-intellectueel & schandalig.
Dat gaat weer schuren. Tegen de "provocatie" ageren Amsterdam Palestina Coalition (belangrijk lid PGNL), pro-Hamas-koepel PGNL, PGNL-subcomité Netherlands Global Sumud, Nakba-herdenkers en Leve 7 Oktober!-schreeuwers Utrecht4Palestine en schaamlap ErevRav.
The Great Political Hoax of the 20th Century
The world has accepted a lie so big, so often repeated, that to question it is treated as heresy. The Palestinian refugee crisis is not a humanitarian catastrophe—it is a strategic creation. The "Palestinian people" were not dispossessed. They were constructed—sculpted into permanent victims to perpetuate conflict, justify terror, and delegitimize the Jewish right to self-determination. Israel built a country. The Arab world built a myth. The result is the most successful fraud of the 20th century—one that still poisons the 21st.