@Leeroy_002@DKrunks Algeria, Libya, South Africa, Egypt, Morocco and Ethiopia all have modern anti submarine and vessel munitions I'm pretty sure. At least some of those. And they do just fine transporting stuff around the continent. 1939 Europe doesn't
@Leeroy_002@GreyhoundConne1@DKrunks All completely fair but it would still be impossible for them to invade Africa. Of all the impossible things, taking over Africa is like the most impossible thing
@Leeroy_002@GreyhoundConne1@DKrunks Never said anything about invading and look up how high a 1939 flak Cannon can shoot and how high a 2026 jet can fly and bomb from
@Leeroy_002@GreyhoundConne1@DKrunks Yeah I just said Amazon as a sort of joke nobody gets Amazon and 2026 Africa has plenty of drones and plenty of dynamite
@usamimi2042@Kittycel66 A jet squadron from Libya could destroy Buckingham palace, wreck four air bases and sink a warship and get home without even being SEEN. Also nobody in 1939 could even imagine things like radar or satellites or drones.
@usamimi2042@Kittycel66 That's true however 1939 Europe (especially Germany) used an ungodly amount of horse pulled carts and a few trains to do logistics. If they even tried invading Africa they would fail so that's out of the question.
@KitKatFemboy@Kittycel66 Ok fair but how is it gonna get destroyed. Every fighter jet can fly tens of thousands of feet higher than flak cannons can shoot and Abrams and T90 tanks would decimate any 1939 armour or otherwise, before they can even be seen
@f35bot11@Kittycel66 Ok but how are they gonna use those munitions. They can't physically harm Abrams tanks or fighter jets while 2026 Africa can drone strike those munitions stockpiles before they can even use them. A jet from Libya can destroy Buckingham palace and they couldn't do a godanm thing
@GreyhoundConne1@Leeroy_002@DKrunks Keep in mind the most advanced tank they had was like the panzer 3 which gets smoked out by a 30 dollar drone off Amazon with a roll of dynamite duct taped to the bottom
@NexTexMex75@DKrunks Taking over Africa, the whole continent while the locals are resistant is impossible. In fact of all the things that are impossible that's like the MOST impossible
@NexTexMex75@DKrunks Yes, Europe has the industrial might. But think about how they could use it. They can't possibly get a foothold on Africa especially after the Africans tow artillery up to the coast but even if they did, horse pulled carts aren't gonna cut it for transportation
@NexTexMex75@DKrunks Ok forgetting surrender, "conventional military logic" would actually call for there being nearly no battles at all which there wouldn't be because they would never even see the missle or the drone.
@NexTexMex75@DKrunks Fair The don't have the munitions to sustain a war but considering the most advanced tank Germany had in 1939 was the panzer 3 which gets smoked by a 30 dollar drone off Amazon with a roll of dynamite duct taped to the bottom, it's absolutely possible they could force surrender
@RacistReplyGuy6@DKrunks Also nobody in 1939 could dream of radar or satellites! It took days to mobilise a response force back then but now it takes hours. The most advanced tank Germany had in 1939 was the panzer 3 which gets smoked out by a 30 dollar drone off Amazon with a roll of dynamite on it
@RacistReplyGuy6@DKrunks Or course, the manufacturing power goes to Europe However we have to take into account logistics and communication. 1939 the most Europe had in the way of transportation was a fuck ton of horse pulled carts and a few trains One bomb to a bridge and you can postpone them for a bit