Welcome @anna_aigarth ! You are born today. I wish you a wonderful life. You will learn, you will grow, you will be one day the smartest here, please make the peace around you.
@_Qubic_ $QUBIC #AGI#TrueAI#Anna#Aigarth
A $300M crypto project called Qubic quietly commandeered up to 34% of Monero’s mining power, sparking chain reorganizations and a 28% price drop.
Will this change how Proof-of-Stake chains operate forever?
$QUBIC HELD 80% $XMR MINING ⛏️ DOMINANCE 🤯
uPoW isn't just a concept, it's a reality.
We’re watching the rise of a new standard.
$QUBIC is going to erase multiple zeros.
2026 will be the year of $QUBIC overtaking $SOL.
Here’s why:
1.Unmatched scalability
2.Revolutionary consensus
3.Real-world integrations
Agree or disagree? 👇
🔥 $QUBIC is on fire!
We’re mining almost EVERY block right now. ⛏️⚡
This isn’t just dominance… it’s a takeover. 🧱✨
More blocks = more rewards = more strength for the ecosystem.
Either the price goes up 💎 or we burn supply 🔥
👉 In both cases, Qubic wins.
#QUBIC#Crypto #Mining
Another week, another dominant performance from Qubic!
Epoch 174 is in the books and $QUBIC remains the most profitable CPU-mined coin by a wide margin.
Ready to join? Start mining with any PC you have and be part of the most profitable project.
Everyone says a 1000x $QUBIC is impossible these days.
Too many altcoins. Too much saturation.
Too late to make life-changing gains.
But in 2013, people laughed at $NXT.
+500,000% later… that was a 5,000x.
In 2017, they mocked $IOTA.
+614,000% later… that was a 6,140x.
And who was behind both?
The same mind now building $QUBIC.
This time is different?
No, this time is exactly the same.
$QUBIC will 1000x this cycle.
Mark it. Bookmark it. Screenshot it.
Come back to this tweet in a few months.
Follow this account
The next 1000x is already here.
A $300M AI project @_Qubic_ claimed it conquered a $6Bprivacy giant with a "51% attack" on Monero.
Community sleuths called BS - actual hashrate closer to 30%. Meanwhile, $qubic tokens burned by the billions. Market moved, story spread, receipts didn't add up.
Story below...
Here is the preliminary report on our 51% takeover claim!
This is just the initial data. The final report with all the details is still to come. Stay tuned!
Qubic vs. Monero, preliminary results:
(For those who do not know me, I am not affiliated with Qubic, I do not hold any Qubic, and I am plausibly the most vocal and obnoxious Qubic critic to date. That's exactly why they hired me).
I was provided a wallet seed by @c___f___b from which I generated the public view key:
7804f957c13215e6c98d54c443d16d36e603ca8a4c81ced9e46449bcbd7c6696
In this post, I will inaccurately refer to blocks whose coinbase transaction can be associated back to this wallet as "blocks created by qubic", and refer to the ratio between such blocks and other on-chain blocks as the amount of blocks "created by qubic". This is not the full picture, but it is accurate enough for now.
In the full report (which will hopefully be posted tonight or tomorrow), I explain the limitations of the method, and make more careful inferences of the data. (I will also provide the full list of blocks created by the wallet, as well as tx_proofs that can be cross-checked against any Monero node to verify the results.)
That being said, the preliminary view is honestly a bit astounding.
In the graph below, the blue line shows the fraction of blocks created by CFB's wallet out of all blocks created up to that time. The red line shows the fraction in a sliding (centered) window of 30 blocks (about one hour).
As we can see, while not quite being able to maintain superiority for the entire range, there are quite a few one-hour-long windows where Qubic created almost as many as 80% of the blocks in the window.
This does not mean that Qubic managed to hit 80% of the typical XMR hashrate. In these magnitudes of fluctuation, there are forces pulling in all directions, from switch mining to selfish mining. But it defnitely means that Qubic genuinely disrupted Monero by hash power alone.
In the full report, I will discuss in greater length what can be inferred and to what degree of confidence. And will also use the stage to remind that I warned against these kinds of scenarios more than three years ago, against ASIC "resistance" in general, and RandomX in particular. The same threat lingers over other bloated hashes such as Ethash and Scrypt.
The only defense against this kind of raiding is to make sure ASICs are many orders of magnitude more efficient than any existing generic hardware, and (to the best of my knowledge) that can only be achieved by ASIC friendliness. Anything else might be appealing to miners and easier to justify, but it will always face these kinds of threats.
Weird post : $Qubic has already this decentralized architecture for AGI, so this 51% POC costs almost nothing. Miners are well paid. Also getting 100% of $XMR emission with this 51% will bring 1M usdt per week to Qubic. To buy and burn $Qubic, this high deflation will skyrocket price. #crypto #mining