@TeamYouTube
Channel: https://t.co/6AL3YgLTIy
I’m genuinely frustrated by this response. I'd like an actual human to review this case PLEASE.
My lawyer conducted a fair use analysis and helped draft my counter-notification. YouTube rejected it, stating that it was “unclear” whether I had a valid reason for filing a counter-notification. However, the basis for the counter-notification was clearly stated that the video qualifies as FAIR USE.
Please explain why this counter-notification was rejected. What specifically was missing from the submission?
Seriously, what is the purpose of a counter-notification process if creators are not told why a legally reviewed submission was rejected?
Meanwhile, a claimant can file a takedown request and a creator receives a strike, but the creator is left guessing why their counter-notification wasn’t accepted.
I am at my wits’ end and am simply asking for transparency and an explanation from the YouTube team 😭😭
Attention Scufflings‼️
We’re doing a GIVEAWAY for my upcoming Mafia Monarch figure! 🦋🙌🏻 All you have to do to enter is RT this post & follow @youtooz !!
3 winners will be announced on release day: December 15th!! 🦋
Vault Boy would approve.
Follow & RT with #FalloutXboxSweepstakes for a chance to win a custom @falloutonprime Xbox Series X, controller, & Fort Knox vault
Ages 18+. US only. Ends 4/14/24. Rules: https://t.co/O0lUIODPKj
Congratulations! Watch #Fallout on Prime Video April 11.