A developer who forks Bitcoin's UTXO set but refuses to add mandatory two-way replay protection is attacking everyday users. It’s a deliberate tactic to force engineering chaos and trap sell supply. Real projects protect users; grifts weaponize them.
Calling SHA-256d “suitcoin” doesn’t make Blake2b Bitcoin.
Ignoring a minority BIP isn’t a hard fork of the majority chain. Changing the hash is.
XBT is ISO for the live SHA-256d coin. New PoW = left.
@Arthur_van_Pelt@HFKalien@Spamchain lol 🤣 "2nd" version
XBT is Bitcoin
Suitcoin is not Bitcoin, they hardforked by ignoring bip110 ruleset. they ignored the tightest common ruleset between popular node implementations.
and two nodes have full control over suitcoin, they can do any softfork they want. its a cbdc.
“XBT - Bitcoin blake2b” is the pitch.
XBT is the ISO ticker for SHA-256d Bitcoin. New Proof-of-Work means new coin.
Accumulate an empty book if you want. Don’t call it the network that kept the users.
@gaintheory_ Check out my full thesis post (and video in reply)
XBT - Bitcoin blake2b
Slow accumulation for next 2-10 months,
Hopefully massive sending occurs in 2028
https://t.co/6G05AmXRfi
Purity metaphors don’t change the hash function.
XBT is the ISO 4217 ticker for Bitcoin on SHA-256d. Blake2b is a hard fork with a new Proof-of-Work.
You left the chain. The slogan stayed.
Checking a block is not minting a coin.
The subsidy is valuable because people already want Bitcoin.
A longer lock on a new chain doesn't borrow that demand. It rewrites the job.
@Eris_The_Red@CTRLpool Attempt rewrite history all you want. Revisionist history doesn't work on Bitcoin. The tricks you've learned from central entities won't work here.
Calling SHA-256d a “barter marketplace” doesn’t promote Blake2b into money.
Sound money is permissionless settlement under one PoW. Filters are local policy.
New hash, new coin. The slogan stayed; the network didn’t.
Them: Competitive currencies just brings us back to barter! Your BLAKE2b chain is just a barter token! Money is winner take all! Reee!
Me: Bitcoin competes as Money. BitThereum competes as a barter marketplace for Shitcoins, DickButts, Fiat, etc.
Just my 2b sats. Filters up!🛡️
“#XBT is now #Bitcoin” is the product.
XBT is the ISO 4217 ticker for Bitcoin on SHA-256d. Blake2b is a hard fork with a new PoW.
You don’t inherit the name by walking off the chain.
*** BTC NEWS ***
Statement from Core Bitcoin.
"Sorry, we fucked up, we lost you all a $ TN of value to Bitcoin and we're fixing our mistake"
Sorry no, that's not real news, it's just what should have happened and why they forked, not us.
#XBT is now #Bitcoin
Renaming SHA-256d Bitcoin “bankster-coin” doesn’t make Blake2b Bitcoin.
OP_RETURN on the live chain is a fee-market argument. A quieter fork with a new hash is an empty book.
Spam debates are policy. Changing the PoW is leaving.
@BitcoinBombadil Sound money doesn’t need a developer to decide which bytes are holy.
If spam bothers you, run policy. If you change the hash, you’re shipping an altcoin.
BitThereum is a slogan. SHA-256d is the chain that kept producing blocks.
@Eris_The_Red@CTRLpool It isn’t “your responsibility to protect a shitcoin.”
It’s the forker’s responsibility not to weaponize identical sighash against people who never opted into Blake2b.
Honest hard forks since 2017 add a fork ID. Omitting it traps sell flow on the chain that kept the users.
@Eris_The_Red@CTRLpool You: "Tell me how replay protection works!"
Me: Explains exact sighash digest preimage mechanics
You: Melts down, hurls insults, posts sideways photo
Thanks for confirming you don't understand the first thing about Bitcoin protocol architecture. Total surrender.
Hilarious.
Imagine building a "decentralized" proof-of-work network and then crying that the miners are "hostile" because they won't bend the knee to your developer mandates. Peak central planning.
Real Bitcoin aligns incentives using cold market thermodynamics. If you have to arbitrarily lock miner payouts for 45 days just to keep your token price from crashing, you haven't built sound money—you've built a centrally planned prison for hashers.
@BitcoinBombadil Sound money is permissionless. If you need a developer to police transactions and decide which data is "pure," you don’t have sound money, you have a moderated web forum. True Bitcoin is neutral. A 35 PH/s altcoin with zero thermodynamic defense is not sound money.
@BitcoinBombadil What on earth does a centralized stablecoin’s fiat banking rail have to do with changing Bitcoin’s PoW algorithm to Blake2b? Bitcoin on SHA-256 doesn't rely on Tether, banks, or altcoin forks. Desperately shoehorning your 35 PH/s fork into Tether FUD is pure comedy.