PatrioticMom1965

[Israel News Pulse @israelnewspulse]

This is Tel Aviv’s main highway right now. 🇺🇸 🇮🇱

[Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 @FmrRepMTG]

Shut up you pathetic little hypocrite.

YOU fully supported our military and IC running the proxy war against Russia in Ukraine.

And you VOTED to fund the Ukraine war under your President with dementia.

You don’t get to play anti-war and moral outrage anymore.

[PatrioticMom1965 @BLJeannin]

@TRUMP_ARMY_ Yes if only he could serve another term!!

[Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump]

https://t.co/2OYrMFlw46

[Rising serpent 🇺🇸 @rising_serpent]

So Trump escapes a second attempt on his life the same day a sworn whistleblower affidavit alleging ABC colluded with Kamala to rig the debate drops, and we are supposed to shut up and believe everything is pure coincidence?
The next 53 days are going to be absolutely insane.

[🇺🇸RealRobert🇺🇸 @Real_RobN]

And here it is,

the Republican Oversight Investigation,

CONFIRMS BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT,

Holy fuck,

Since January 20, 2021, the United States government is being run by a terrorist organization.

The BIDEN/HARRIS TERRORIST ORGANIZATION through the “Inflation Reduction Act” using American tax payers money to fund DOMESTIC TERRORISM on United States soil in the name of the greatest criminal conspiracy ever perpetrated on humanity, Climate Change,

“In fact,
there’s been a recent rush to get this money out. And that’s because they know there’s a likelihood that the administration will change to come November.”

And here is the follow the money,

A: Climate Justice: $100 million to one terrorist organization to glorify another, Hamas,

B: NDN Collective: $100 million to defund law enforcement and obliterate the United States military.

C: NY Immigration Coalition/NJ Alliance for Immigrant Justice: $50 million for open borders and annihilate citizenship.

D: Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs: $50 million to abolish police and abolish prisons.

E: Ella Baker Center for Humam Rights: $1 to $3 million to defund the police, decriminalize shoplifting and abolish prisons.

“I'm going to say that Vice President Harris…is quoted here, ‘I put equity at the center of our nation's largest investment in climate in history, to reach the organizations that know their community best.’ That's what she said when they rolled out and actually named these terror organizations.”

In other words,

A: these are the domestic terrorist organizations who RULE Kamala Harris.

And

B: these are the types of terror programs unfolding across United States and western civilization since 2008 under the chief of terror Barack Obama in the name of Climate Change, the weapon of mass destruction.

[JD Vance @JDVance]

Yesterday, Donald J. Trump nearly lost his life. An armed gunman waited for him in the bushes. He brought a go-pro camera to record it. A secret service agent spotted the barrel of a gun through a fence and shot at the gunman. The gunman fled. He was caught. And now we slowly learn about him and his motive.

President Trump is my running mate, and my friend, but he is more importantly a father and grandfather to people who love him very much. I want him to have many more years with his family. (And selfishly, I'd like many more with my own.)

I admire the president for calling for peace and calm. The rhetoric is out of control. It nearly got Steve Scalise and many others killed a few years ago. It nearly got Donald Trump killed twice. But I want to say something about yesterday's news, and how it illuminates the difference between vigorous debate and violent rhetoric.

Here is what we know so far: Kamala Harris has said that "Democracy is on the line" in her race against President Trump. The gunman agreed, and used the exact same phrase. He had a Kamala Harris bumper sticker on his truck. He was obsessed with Ukraine's "fight for Democracy" and absorbed many unhinged views about the Russia-Ukraine war. HIs name is Ryan Routh, and he donated 19 times to Democrat causes and zero to Republican ones.

How do you think the Democrats and their media allies would respond if a 19-time Republican donor tried to kill a Democratic official? It's a question that answers itself. For years, Kamala Harris's campaign surrogates have said things like "Trump has to be eliminated." And how have their media allies responded to the second assassination attempt on Donald Trump in as many months?

NBC News called the attempted assassination a "golf club incident." The LA Times told us "Trump Targeted at Golf Club." The USA Today's top of the fold headline is "Hope in America," and they published a preposterous letter to the editor arguing that Trump "brings these assassination attempts on himself." CNN's Dana Bash--who just yesterday bizarrely accused me of inciting a bomb threat--said today that Harris campaign rhetoric didn't motivate Routh even though he echoed their rhetoric explicitly.

PBS's weekend show perfectly illustrates the double standard of Kamala Harris's media friends. After spending 30 seconds on the second assassination attempt on President Trump, they then focused on the real danger: me and President Trump, who are, according to them, personally responsible for bomb threats against Springfield. Of course, I repeatedly condemend those threats. And reports today suggest they came from a foreign country, not--as the media suggested--a deranged Trump fan.

The double standard is breathtaking. Donald Trump and I are, by their account, directly responsible for bomb threats from foreign countries. Why? Because we had the audacity to repeat what residents told us about the problems in their town. Meanwhile, Harris allies call for Trump to be eliminated as the media publishes arguments that he deserved to be shot.

This seems like a double standard. But at a deep level, it is entirely consistent.

Consider Springfield. Citizens are telling us that there are problems. These include the undeniable truths of higher car accidents, unaffordable housing, evictions of residents, overcrowded hospitals, overstressed schools, and rising rates of disease. They also include the infamous pet stories--which, again, multiple people have spoken about (either on video or to me or my staff).

Kamala Harris's first strategy was to ignore these people and their concerns. Yes, she had prevented the deportation of millions of illegal aliens, and some of them made their way to Springfield. But it was a small town with no voice. Some of the local leadership even loved the cheap labor. So the suffering of thousands of American citizens went ignored.

Their next move with these stories is censorship. In Springfield, a psychopath (or a foreign government) calls in a bomb threat, so they blame that on President Trump (and me). The threat of violence is disgraceful of course, yet the media seems to relish it. They cover a bomb threat, but not the rise in murders. They cover the threat, but not the HIV uptick. They cover the threat, not the schools overwhelmed with new kids who don't speak English. They cover the threat, not rising insurance rates or the car accidents that caused them. They cover the threat, not the failures of Kamala Harris's leadership.

The purpose is not to turn down the rhetoric. If anything, covering the bomb threats gives whoever makes them exactly what he wants: attention. The purpose is distraction and shame. How dare you talk about the problems of Haitian migration in Springfield? You're endangering people, simply by discussing the problems of Kamala Harris's policies. It's a form of moral blackmail, designed not to make anyone safe but to shut everyone up.

Springfield is the most recent, but hardly the most egregious example. There was the Hunter Biden laptop story, censored by BigTech. And who can forget that anyone who didn't support Kamala Harris's Ukraine policy was drenched in the blood of Ukrainian children. That last one appears to have had some effect on Routh--the most recent would-be assassin. The message is always the same: don't you dare express an opinion on the public affairs of your nation. The message is: shut up.

This is the difference between debate--even aggressive debate--and censorship. It is one thing to attack Kamala Harris for "destroying the country" and quite another to say that President Trump should be "eliminated." It is one thing to criticize overheated rhetoric, and another to say that a former president has invited an assassination on himself. It is one thing to say that Donald J. Trump's arguments about the election of 2020 are wrong; it is another thing to attempt to remove him from the ballot over it.

It is one thing to say that pets are not, in fact being eaten, and another thing to say that anyone who disagrees is trying to murder people. Dissent, even vigorous dissent, is a great tradition of the United States. Censorship is not.

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind. I believe you have every right to criticize me and Donald J. Trump, even if you say terrible or untrue things about us. But when I ask you to "tone down the rhetoric" it's not about being nice--our citizens have every right to be mean, even if I don't like it--or empty platitudes.

Instead, I'm asking all of us to reject censorship. Reject the idea that you can control what other people think and say. Embrace persuasion of your fellow citizens over silencing them--either through the powers of Big Tech or through moral blackmail.

I think this will make our public debate much better. But there's something else. Reject censorship and you reject political violence. Embrace censorship, and you will inevitably embrace violence on its behalf.

The reason is simple. The logic of censorship leads directly to one place, for there is only one way to permanently silence a human being: put a bullet in his brain.

[Donald Trump Jr. @DonaldJTrumpJr]

You know what’s getting really old? Having to have conversations with my 5 young children about radical leftist trying to kill their grandfather. No person should ever have to do this in America or anywhere else and yet I had to have that conversation five times again yesterday.

[⚜️💎👑 Queen Katerina 👑💎⚜️ @QueenDarbyy]

In her own words...
K@mala says, "...18-24 year olds are STUPID!"
#SwiftiesForTrump

[Publius @OcrazioCornPop]

🚨 VIRAL TIKTOK TREND: "Uh Oh I Don't Know About You, But I'm Voting Donald Trump Baby!"

#SwiftiesForTrump 🇺🇸❤️

[⚜️💎👑 Queen Katerina 👑💎⚜️ @QueenDarbyy]

"Screw you, Taylor Swift!"
#SwiftiesForTrump

[Stefanie Spear @StefanieSpear]

Independent Presidential Candidate @RobertKennedyJr will address the nation live on Friday about the present historical moment and his path forward. 🇺🇸

https://t.co/i8gVV96xYW

[PatrioticMom1965 @BLJeannin]

@elonmusk 5 mil votes in 3 hrs majority for President Trump. Kamala who???? ❤️🇺🇸💙

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Since a lot of people have asked, here goes a super unscientific poll …

Who will you vote for?

[Yan.x | ॐ @euphorio_]

@simonateba He summed up all his policies here!

[👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈 @TheEXECUTlONER_]

@realDonaldTrump The Border Czar Kamala Harris- failure

[Paratrooper Brady @paratroopbrady]

@realDonaldTrump Trumps Agenda!!

[PatrioticMom1965 @BLJeannin]

@realDonaldTrump ❤️🇺🇸💙

[PatrioticMom1965 @BLJeannin]

@realDonaldTrump ❤️🇺🇸💙