Gerry Smith

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@BadgedPatriot Oh sure.....that's why they are called FLOCK because they herd vehicles and not SHEEP (people.) My gawd we really are not that stupid especially when police lips move....they lie.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@JasonBassler1 💗💗💗

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@lady_valor_07 Government.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@theNyx__ Not enough content in video.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@viraltrends01 Police work for a corporation UNDER the color of law. That is a huge issue. See 18 USC 242.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@wildklip They showed you who they are. Now you know. You didn't ruin anything, they did.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@rlLoganM @thegabriel72 Police work for a corporation UNDER the color of law. See 18 USC 242. Clearly you don't do any research. I think your a shill. Your demeaning content gives you away. Try harder. Lol

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@thegabriel72 Thugs on patrol.

[Michèle Ferris @Micheleferrisfr]

Banks have never lent money, all loans come from the personal trust Cestui Que Vie. The value of money creation is backed by our lives.

[All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿 @skillz17q]

KOLENDER V LAWSON 461 US 352, 1983

A POLICE OFFICER CAN NOT ARREST A CITIZEN FOR REFUSING TO PRESENT IDENTIFICATION, THERE IS NO SUCH THING CALLED FAILURE TO IDENTIFY... You don't have to present ID unless there's a corpus delicti.... That a crime has been committed...

OWEN V. INDEPENDENCE , 100 S.C.T. 398, 445 US 622

OFFICERS OF THE COURT HAVE NO IMMUNITY WHEN VIOLATING A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT FROM LIABILITY, FOR YOU ARE DEEMED TO KNOW THE LAW... title 18 usc subsection 4.....also title 18 usc 2381 cannan # 7........................................... Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)
“ An unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights, it imposes no duties, it affords no
protections, it creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it has never been
passed .”

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 137 137 (1803)
“No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect,” “Anything that is in conflict is
null and void of law”, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was illogical, for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended that the supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”

Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980)
The right of action created by statute relating to deprivation under color of law, of a right secured
by the constitution and the laws of the United States and comes claims which are based solely on statutory violations of Federal Law and applied to the claim that claimants had been deprived of their rights, in some capacity, to which they were entitled.”

“ Officers of the court have no immunity when violating constitutional right, from liability ”

16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 256:

“ The general rule is that a unconstitutional statute, whether Federal or State, though having the form and name of law as in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose since unconstitutionality dates from the enactment and not merrily from the date of the decision so braining it .

An unconstitutional law in legal contemplation is as inoperative as if it never had been passed . Such a statute lives a question that is purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not ever been enacted. No repeal of an enactment is necessary, since an unconstitutional law is void .

The general principles follows that it imposes no duty, converse no rights, creates no office, bestows no power of authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it .

A contract which rests on a unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law. No courts are bound to enforce it. Persons convicted and fined under a statute subsequently held unconstitutional may recover the fines paid. A void act cannot be legally inconsistent with a valid one and an unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede an existing valid law.

[W.R. Schock, QBD @iontecs_pemf]

@DianaT192 This is why I am on different holistic parasite cleanses 6 days a week, 52 weeks a year. Because they are the number 1 threat against making it through this separation alive. They've hidden this since before you were born to make big harma rich. And yes, you absolutely have them.

[All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿 @skillz17q]

— The 16 words: "any such law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the State to the contrary notwithstanding" - Civil Rights Act of 1871, 17 Stat. 13
— This is the SCOTUS precedent states use invoke immunity when a 1983 action is filed.
—"We presume that Congress would have specifically so provided had it wished to abolish the doctrine" — Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547, 555 (1967) — Congress did provide it in the 16 words above.
— We have not attempted to change the law, in a single word or letter..." — Rep. Butler, 2 Cong. Rec. 129 (1873)
— Speaking about the clerks who removed the 16 words in this and other laws from the 1800's"...discloses no warrant to do so." — Justice Powell, concurring, Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Org., 441 U.S. 600, 625 (1979)
— "not intended to alter the scope of the provision" — Hague v. CIO*, 307 U.S. 496, 510 (1939)

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@mary_got_grace 8pm EST?

[Silver ❤️ @Joey37394977091]

The people we pay taxes to will not think twice about murdering you. NEVER EVER FORGET RUBY RIDGE
Side note Lavoy Finicam RIP Also murdered as I watched. And then agents tormented a woman and teen in the car with bullets after they watched him murdered.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@TheFlatEartherr WISE

[W.R. Schock, QBD @iontecs_pemf]

@Darrell65167496 Diabetes is parasites. Hydrogen peroxide is supposed to end it. Research quickly.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@CherieBeneteau It's called stealing and the Gov't KNOWS IT.

[W.R. Schock, QBD @iontecs_pemf]

@ninoboxer We are already in a national emergency & the Save Act will 100% pass. Then everything in America will change. Till then you will continue to see only assured devastation & take over of this country. Sometimes you have to show them before they will wake up.
https://t.co/dbhFI1LZi3

[All4Freedom🇺🇲🐸🍿 @skillz17q]

Every time a bank, court, hospital, or employer asked for your SS Number without giving you an SSA-89 — that was identity theft. They were required to get your signed consent before accessing your SSA account. They never did. The SSA-89 is the form that gives you back control. Select "Other" and you revoke all prior consent in one move. No addendum. No lawyer. Just the box. And once you name your private trust as the authorized entity on that form, you have created a permanent, federally recognized link between your SSN and your sovereign structure — one that cuts off the Title IV funding that keeps people locked in courts, prisons, and CPS cases. This is their system. We're just reading the instructions.

[Gerry Smith @Bluebird1333]

@iontecs_pemf @MJTruthUltra I am wondering how a takeover of the UK is enforced?