Googoogeegee

E

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Minchman16670 @Rambat @HasansOldTweets i don't even know what type of content Hasan does, and i don't really care all that much.
but, i read into what people have been saying, all i know is hasan's a short tempered bitch, so he does short-tempered-bitch things.
it's wrong yes, but it's not right to call it abusive.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Rambat @HasansOldTweets (2/2) then it doesn't really make sense to call him abusive.

hasan is just a dumbass with a short temper.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Rambat @HasansOldTweets didnt say pulling on the tail was good in any shape or form
taking your example:
- can you pull on hair without harming someone? yes.
- should you still do it? no.

does it seem like he injured, or intended to injure the dog? not really, no

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@NoTime2Heel @BoxLoner @Spiderdx109 apologies for the wrong terminology.
anyway, can you send any evidence of the metal threads being removable? gatekeeping isn't cool, especially on a topic like this.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@pemabble @HasansOldTweets im not saying hes good for pulling the dog's tail. i'm just calling out OP's exaggeration.
even if you can pull a dog's tail without causing harm, you shouldnt do it. hasans just a short-tempered asshole; though im not going to call him abusive just because he did something wrong

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Gizmo1111233344 @esjesjesj i'm having a seizure reading this.
you don't always need rubber over the tips.

anyway, spike collars are more nail-like, which is definitely abusive., prong collars are dull.

top comment explains ethics of prong collars really well, read up on it:
https://t.co/u8ZasWHK2k

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Borys47412980 @Snaxy @HasansOldTweets if this dumbass comment is because of the genocides:
if you can show they have any involvement with the IDF, fair enough.
otherwise, keep foaming at the mouth every time you see 🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱

seperate the people from the war (unless they're gov. involved, then go shit on em).

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Snaxy @HasansOldTweets i don't know about you but i don't have a tail; evolution removed it.
let me phrase it better:
you can pull a dog's tail without injuring it.
should he still do it regardless? no
does it seem like he injured the dog, or tried to? no
js seems like a stupid decision by a stupid man

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@peachyvodka_ @HasansOldTweets (2/2)
you are able to pull a dog by their tail without causing any harm,
should you still do it. no.

does it look like he injured the dog, or had intentions to? not really.
therefore i don't think it's right to label this "abusive".
it's wrong, though not necessarily abusive.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@peachyvodka_ @HasansOldTweets i completely agree; i was only pointing out the stupid exaggeration by OP, since it sounds like he intentionally hurt the dog.
i should've worded my post better;
(1/2)

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@SwedishAion @HasansOldTweets if what OP said was what actually happened in the video, he would be using excessive force, which would lead me to believe that he was intending to harm the dog, which would classify him as abusive
but the video doesn't really show that, just more of a stupid shortsighted action.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@SwedishAion @HasansOldTweets exactly what i was getting at.
you are able to pull on a dogs tail lightly without injuring them.
should you still do it, no.

i think people just immediately hop on the bandwagon as soon as someone does something wrong, regardless of the result.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Thefurryeddhead @HasansOldTweets regardless, he indeed shouldn't have pulled her tail in risk of injuring the dog - and by no means was i trying to defend that part in specific.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Thefurryeddhead @HasansOldTweets this was the main thought behind the tweet, the OP says he's pulled the tail with "such force", which would in turn mean he severely injured the dog
i don't think that the intent was to injure the dog, but just to keep her still. so labelling him as an abuser doesn't seem right

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@MugiwaraRymo @cclairemcd @thinkpiecetribe If you're saying it's debunked at least list the evidence please, wrong time to gatekeep it hun. 💅

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@Gizmo1111233344 @esjesjesj a spike collar and prong collar are vastly different, please research your evidence before you run around screaming "OMGLUL SPIKE COLAR ON DOG! PROOF HE ABOOSER XDDDD".
you sound like a moron.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@RiseUp44 @BoxLoner @Spiderdx109 Reading the manual, you get two sets of contact points of varying lengths for the dog's fur-type - and those are held on by metal screw bits.

Are those metal screws removable? If so, are you able to demonstrate it? Since then the electrical tape seems like a valid concern.

[Googoogeegee @BobRossRobBoss]

@jacolbysmith6 @HasansOldTweets the whole middle east has been killing each other ever since the ottoman empire collapsed. it's not a new thing.

better yet, how can you complain about Gaza when Chernobyl in Ukraine got drone-striked again? did we forget about that war now?