DomB

IT/AV Pro. Family, sun, water, beaches, boats, beer, outdoors, MMA, crypto, tech, dogs, A&D, tennis. Turbo boxers, B-series, old Yota 4x4, enduro, ebikes & MTB

[DomB @bomabvi]

@Meta actively disabling Portal functionality for families who've spent hundreds on these devices is disgusting. Including my Quest headset we've spent 1000s on Meta hardware. Never again will I purchase any Meta hardware.

[Himanshu Kumar @codewithimanshu]

I'm quitting my job to go full-in on Claude.

Just Asked it to:

Analyze mispriced Polymarket markets for arbitrage opportunities and find wallets using it to copy.

Turned $2K into $12K overnight.
Monitored 1,000+ wallets.

I realized something fast.

There are arbitrage bots I can't beat without code knowledge.

But I can find them. And copy them.

Claude built a monitoring terminal and connected it to a Telegram copytrading bot.

It's not a script. Not even a bot.

It's an AI agent that improves with every wallet it finds.

Fetches wallet behavior. How it trades. Arbitrage patterns. Position sizing. Timing.

70% win rate.
7 wallets copytrading right now from 500+ monitored.

Bot never pauses. Never gambles. Just math and profit.

You only need: Claude + a device + 1 hour per day.

Giving this free for 24 hours.

To get it:

1. Comment "cash"
2. Like and retweet this
3. Follow me @codewithimanshu so I can DM you

[DomB @bomabvi]

So if AI is really trying to take over, why aren't our latest AI algorithmic trading bots letting all these stock options slide the segment?

[HOSTIS @hostis_black]

In April, a website that has been sued, blocked, deplatformed, and chased across thirty-seven domains over fifteen years quietly launched its own AI.

Sci-Hub is the largest unauthorized library of scientific papers in human history. Ninety-five million academic papers. Tens of millions of books. Built and maintained by a single Kazakhstani neuroscientist named Alexandra Elbakyan since 2011, funded by donations, hosted on whatever country's registrar will tolerate it that year, mirrored across torrents and IPFS and Telegram bots.

Elsevier sued. Sci-Hub stayed up. The American Chemical Society sued. Sci-Hub stayed up. India sued. Sci-Hub stayed up. Swedish registrar Njalla cut the .se domain in January. Sci-Hub stayed up at .al, .ru, .ee, .box, and a half-dozen .onion addresses the registrars cannot reach.

Now the library has built its own intelligence.

Sci-Bot launched in alpha in April. You ask it a research question. It answers, and it cites real papers from inside the corpus, with links that actually open the actual papers.

The bot does not hallucinate citations. It cannot, because it only draws from papers it actually holds. The same property that the venture-funded labs have spent four years and forty billion dollars trying to engineer back into their products is a free side effect of training the model on a library that contains the books.

Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta have all been sued in the past eighteen months for training their models on the same shadow libraries that Sci-Hub assembled. Meanwhile the corpus those scripts were pointed at, the corpus those models were trained on, the corpus the entire generative AI industry is built on, sat right there the whole time, free, with a search box on top.

The pirates beat them to it.

Sci-Bot was built on a corpus that was already free, by a team that asked no permission, charging no one, with the explicit position that the right to read scientific research is older than the cartel that decided to charge for it.

The same arithmetic the medieval guilds used to keep the printing trade in approved hands. The same arithmetic Pope Paul IV used in 1559 to publish the Index Librorum Prohibitorum. The same arithmetic the Stationers' Company used in seventeenth-century London.

Knowledge has always had a fence around it. The fence has always been guarded by men who did not write the books.

The library answers. We never asked permission. We never had to.

[Diana ❤️🇺🇸🙏🐸 @DianaT192]

ANOTHER HIDDEN CANCER CURE AND OTHER CURES.

IN 1985, DR. BJÖRN NORDENSTRÖM — HEAD OF RADIOLOGY AT KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE, THE SAME INSTITUTION THAT AWARDS THE NOBEL PRIZE — PUBLISHED PROOF THAT THE HUMAN BODY RUNS ON ELECTRICAL CIRCUITS. HE CURED LUNG AND BREAST TUMORS USING ONLY ELECTRICITY. HIS OWN COLLEAGUES REFUSED TO READ HIS BOOK.
Björn Nordenström was not a fringe scientist. He was not working from a garage. He was the chairman of the Nobel Assembly that selects Nobel Prize winners in medicine. He was the head of diagnostic radiology at Karolinska Institute in Stockholm — arguably the most prestigious medical institution in Scandinavia. He had pioneered needle biopsy techniques used in every hospital on Earth.
When this man published a book in 1983 called "Biologically Closed Electric Circuits," the medical world should have stopped and listened. Instead, they pretended it did not exist.
Nordenström had spent 20 years conducting research that revealed something the medical establishment was not prepared to accept: the human body contains a secondary circulatory system — not of blood, not of lymph — but of electricity. Electrical circuits that flow through blood vessels, connective tissue, and interstitial fluid. Circuits that regulate healing, immune response, and tissue growth. Circuits that, when disrupted, allow cancer to develop.
He did not just theorize this. He proved it. With patients.
Between 1978 and 1983, Nordenström treated lung and breast tumors by inserting electrodes directly into the tumor mass and applying a low-level direct current. The electrical field disrupted the tumor's bioelectric environment. White blood cells were attracted to the site by electrotaxis — movement guided by electrical gradients. The tumor's blood supply collapsed. The cancer cells died.
He documented complete regression of tumors in patients who had been declared terminal. Published the results. Showed the before-and-after imaging. Provided the mechanism. Named the circuits. Mapped the pathways.
The response from his colleagues at Karolinska? Silence. Then dismissal. Then active suppression.
His book was reviewed by almost no major medical journal. His funding was cut. His clinical trials were not continued after his retirement. The man who helped select Nobel Prize winners could not get his own research taken seriously by the institution he led.
Why?
Because if Nordenström was right — and his clinical results proved he was — then the entire foundation of oncology was wrong. Cancer was not primarily a genetic disease requiring chemical warfare. It was a bioelectrical disease requiring electrical correction. A tumor was not a random mutation. It was a short circuit in the body's electrical system.
Treatment would cost pennies. A DC power supply and two electrodes. No chemotherapy drugs at $10,000 per cycle. No radiation machines at $5 million each. No surgical suites. No pharmaceutical patents.
The Chinese took notice. In the 1990s, researchers in China replicated Nordenström's work and expanded it. They called it Electrochemical Therapy (ECT). Over 10,000 patients were treated in Chinese hospitals with reported success rates above 70% for certain solid tumors. Published in Chinese medical journals. Used in clinical practice. Completely ignored by Western medicine.
Nordenström died in 2006 at age 86. His electrical circuits have been independently verified by multiple research groups. His clinical results were never debunked — only ignored. His book remains out of print and nearly impossible to find.
The head of the Nobel Prize committee proved that cancer can be treated with electricity. And medicine chose to look the other way.
Source: QuantumMedicineNews

Prof. Bjorn Nordenstrom was emeritus professor of radiology at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden. He was former member of the Nobel Prize Committee for Medicine.
His book “Biologically Closed Electric Circuits”

[DomB @bomabvi]

@LinkedInHelp @LinkedIn you have implemented security that only accepts my passport as ID verification. I guess that"s my 20+ yr old account closed then!

[DomB @bomabvi]

@obarbara__ Women.

[DomB @bomabvi]

@49thAwakening @Vivek4real_ 😂

[DomB @bomabvi]

@cryptofergani me

[DJI @DJIGlobal]

Giveaway time! Here's your chance to win the DJI Lito X1 — sub-249g, 1/1.3-inch sensor, Forward LiDAR omnidirectional obstacle avoidance, 36-minute flight on the standard battery.

How to enter:
1. Follow @DJIGlobal
2. Like and share this post
3. Bonus Chance: Comment below — what's the one

[DomB @bomabvi]

@DJIGlobal would love one for my Mongolia trip next month!

[Stefan Moore ★ @2StefanMoore]

A final piece of advice from Holly Butcher - written the day before she passed away from cancer at just 27:

“It’s a strange thing knowing you’re going to die young.

At 26, I thought I had time…
To fall in love.
Start a family.
Grow old.

But cancer doesn’t care about plans.

Now, I understand how fragile life really is. Every single day is a gift, not a guarantee.

I’m not writing this to scare you. I’m writing to remind you: really live.

Stop stressing over little things. Be kind to your body- move it, nourish it, stop criticizing it. One day you’ll wish you had appreciated it.

Go outside.
Look at the sky.
Feel the sun.
Just be.

Spend less time chasing “stuff” - more time making memories. Don’t skip moments with people you love.

Laugh more.
Write a note.
Tell someone you love them.

Complain less.
Give more.
Helping others brings more joy than anything you can buy.

Be present.
Put your phone down.
Show up - really show up.

You don’t need to have it all figured out. You don’t need a perfect body, or a perfect life.

Just follow what makes your heart light up. Say no to what drains you. Make changes when you need to.

And please - donate blood. I wouldn’t have had that extra year without it. And that year gave me memories I’ll hold close… forever.

Thank you for reading this.
Live your life well.

And maybe… we’ll meet again someday.”

Holly 🩷

Repost & share Holly’s important advice. ❤️

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

I have three monitors on my desk. The left one shows the order book. The middle one shows Truth Social. The right one shows the investigation queue.

On April 21st, the left screen moved first.

I am a Senior Surveillance Analyst at a commodities exchange. I have held this position for nineteen years. My job is to monitor trading activity for suspicious patterns and generate compliance reports. I am employee of the quarter. I have a mug.

At 19:54 GMT on April 21st, someone placed 4,260 sell orders on Brent crude futures. They did this during post-settlement. The window after the market closes when daily volume is typically in the dozens. Sometimes single digits. Sometimes I watch the screen and nothing happens for forty minutes and I think about whether my daughter is happy.

On April 21st, someone placed $430 million in directional bets in 120 seconds during that window. One hundred and twenty seconds. I timed it on my watch because the system clock rounds to the nearest minute and I have found, in nineteen years, that precision matters to no one but me.

At 20:10 GMT, the President posted on Truth Social that he was extending the Iran ceasefire.

Brent dropped from $100.91 to $96.83.

I flagged the trade. I flag a lot of trades. I want to tell you what happens to my flags.

My flags go into a system called TRACE. Trade Review and Compliance Evaluation. I did not name it. The system generates a report. The report goes to a committee. The committee has a name I am not allowed to share but I can tell you it meets quarterly and the conference room has a credenza with bottled water that is sparkling because someone once put still water in the room and a managing director sent an email about it that was longer than most of my surveillance reports.

The committee reviews my flags. The committee has reviewed all of my flags. Here is the complete record of actions taken on my flags in 2026:

Reviewed.

That's it. "Reviewed" is a status. In compliance, a status is the absence of an action that has been given a name so it looks like one.

Let me show you my flags.

March 9th. Someone bet millions on oil falling at 18:29 GMT. Forty-seven minutes later, a CBS reporter posted that the President said the Iran war was "very complete, pretty much." Oil dropped 25%. Forty-seven minutes. I flagged it.

March 23rd. Someone sold 5,100 lots of Brent and WTI crude futures between 10:49 and 10:50 GMT. Fourteen minutes later, the President posted on Truth Social about a "COMPLETE AND TOTAL RESOLUTION" to hostilities. Oil dropped 11%. Over 13,000 contracts traded in sixty seconds after the post. Fourteen minutes. I flagged it.

April 7th. Someone established a $950 million short position in oil futures at 19:45 GMT. Three hours later, the President declared a two-week ceasefire. Nine hundred and fifty million dollars. I flagged it.

April 17th. Someone placed $760 million in bearish bets twenty minutes before Iran's foreign minister confirmed the Strait of Hormuz would reopen. Seven hundred and sixty million. I flagged it.

April 21st. The $430 million. Fifteen minutes. I flagged it.

That is $2.1 billion in directional oil bets in April alone. Every one of them landed on the correct side of a presidential announcement. Every one of them was placed in a window so narrow you could measure it in bathroom breaks. I flagged every single one.

The CFTC chair told a Congressional committee that his organization has "zero tolerance" for fraud and insider trading. I wrote that quote on a Post-it note and stuck it to my right monitor. The one that shows the investigation queue. The investigation queue has not moved since March.

Zero tolerance. Zero staff. Zero budget. Zero prosecutions under the STOCK Act since it was signed in 2012.

Fourteen years. The law has existed for fourteen years and has been enforced zero times. In compliance, we call that a compliance rate of one hundred percent. No cases filed means no cases lost. You cannot fail an audit you never conduct. We call that excellence.

Last month the White House sent an internal email to staff. I was not on the distribution list but I have read reporting on it and I need you to sit with what I am about to say. The email instructed White House staff not to use insider information to place bets on prediction markets.

The White House had to send a memo telling its own employees not to insider-trade.

I want you to read that sentence again. Not because the instruction was unclear. Because the instruction was necessary. Because someone in the building looked at the same pattern I have been flagging for months on my three monitors and decided the appropriate response was an email.

The President's son sits on the advisory board of Kalshi. He is an investor in Polymarket. Both are prediction markets. Both saw accounts created days before U.S. military action.

One account. I cannot stop thinking about this account. It was called "Burdensome-Mix." It was created in December. On January 2nd, it placed $32,500 on Venezuela's president being removed from power. On January 3rd, Maduro was seized by U.S. special forces. Burdensome-Mix collected $436,000. Then it changed its username. Then it disappeared.

One account is a coincidence. But there were six.

Six accounts were created on Polymarket in February. All bet on U.S. strikes on Iran by the 28th. When the President confirmed the strikes, the six accounts collected $1.2 million between them. Five of the six never placed another bet. The sixth went on to correctly predict the ceasefire date and made another $163,000.

My surveillance system logged all of this. My system logs everything. My system does not have opinions and neither do I. I generate reports. The reports go to committees. The committees meet quarterly. Between meetings, the windows get shorter and the bets get larger.

March 9th: 47 minutes. March 23rd: 14 minutes. April 17th: 20 minutes. April 21st: 15 minutes.

The window is compressing. In March, you had time to make coffee between the trade and the announcement. By April, you had time to send a text. By summer, at this rate, the trade and the announcement will be the same event.

The spokesman said any implication that administration officials are engaged in insider trading is "baseless and irresponsible reporting."

Then the White House sent the email again.

I have been in compliance for nineteen years. I have seen insider trading run out of strip mall offices by men who could not spell "derivative." I have seen pump-and-dump schemes coordinated over WhatsApp by people who used their real names. I have seen a man try to manipulate soybean futures from a Panera Bread.

I have never seen $2.1 billion in perfectly timed trades across five presidential announcements in a single month go uninvestigated.

But I have also never seen a compliance system work this beautifully. Every trade flagged. Every report filed. Every committee briefed. Every quarterly meeting attended. Bottled water: sparkling. Minutes: distributed.

Zero prosecutions.

As long as the flags go up and the cases don't, my performance review says I am meeting expectations.

I am meeting expectations. The system is meeting expectations. The $2.1 billion is meeting expectations. The fourteen-year-old law with zero prosecutions is meeting expectations.

The left screen moves. The middle screen moves. The right screen stays perfectly, immaculately still.

In my field, we call this price discovery.

[Avi Roy @agingroy]

12 patients with metastatic cancer. Melanoma, breast, kidney.

Doctors injected a re-engineered antibody (CD40 agonist) into a single tumor. Not IV. Not systemic. One local shot.

The result: tumors shrank across the entire body, including at sites that were never touched.

2 of 12 patients hit complete remission. The injected tumors didn’t just shrink. They were replaced by organized immune tissue, tertiary lymphoid structures, essentially training camps for cancer-killing T cells.

Zero severe side effects.

The concept: instead of flooding the body with immunotherapy and hoping it finds the cancer, turn one tumor into a vaccine against itself. Train the immune system locally. Let it hunt globally.

Nearly 200 patients now in expanded trials across bladder, prostate, and brain cancers.

Published in @Cancer_Cell by Jeffrey Ravetch’s lab at @RockefellerUniv and @MSKCancerCenter

[DomB @bomabvi]

@X_FINALBOSS Blueprint

[DomB @bomabvi]

@Aliceshaw25 totally fine with this

[DomB @bomabvi]

@GoDaddyHelp worst 2 hours of "support" ever. Because SMS recovery IS BROKEN, I cannot recover account by turning off 2FA despite full access to registered email & phone and correct un/pwd. Total refusal to escalate my issue. Complaint filed with BBB to restore access.

[AMV @avinson101]

@qrimeCapital I have concluded that everyone using openclaw is only using openclaw to automatically post on how they make money with openclaw.

[DomB @bomabvi]

@Vivek4real_ Watch us crash to 55k.

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

🚨 THE BIGGEST CRYPTO MYSTERY HAS FINALLY BEEN RESOLVED.

Who crashed Luna and UST to 0 and brought down the entire crypto market in 2022?

Jane Street.

The same Jane Street accused of "10AM manipulation" also front-ran the 2022 Terra collapse.

In February 2026, the Terraform Labs bankruptcy administrator filed a lawsuit in Manhattan.

They accused Jane Street of causing the Terra collapse.

For those who don't remember, UST depegged in May 2022.

This caused LUNA to hyperinflate due to its mechanism, and $40B was wiped out within days.

Later, the same collapse had a domino effect, which started a brutal crypto winter.

As per the lawsuit, UST depeg was a smart playbook by Jane.

Here’s the timeline outlined in court:

• In May, Terraform quietly pulls 150M UST liquidity from Curve
• Minutes later, Jane Street allegedly dumps 85M UST
• Panic spreads
• Depeg accelerated, and a collapse happened.

The complaint also claims Jane Street had advance knowledge via a private group chat called “Bryce’s Secret.”

A Jane Street trader who was a former Terraform intern and provided insider information.

But that's not all.

The suit alleges Jane Street:

• Avoided $200M+ in losses
• Profited during the meltdown
• Positioned themselves while retail was wiped out

Jane Street has denied everything and called the lawsuit “baseless.”

But the timeline indicates that Jane Street maybe behind all this.

And this begs a very important question.

What if the real culprit behind the October 10th crash is also Jane Street?