As a non-American looking in from the outside, this was the moment I realised many Americans are really fucked in the head. This should have been the point where people calmed down and realised politics were not that deep. Instead people decided to lie about him in order to justify mocking his life, celebrating his death and bullying his widow
@nypost Dude is more horrified at a water bottle being squeezed in front of him than the actual strangling to death of three young children. What a morally sick cuck. These 11 jurors have their sensibilities completely miswired.
This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works:
1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal which publishes an exclusive with quotes from him on his resignation 18 minutes BEFORE this post goes up. Planning was clearly done in advance.
2.) Within hours, it has tens of thousands of reposts and the account has 100k+ followers. The post is punchy, quotable, it almost seems professionally written. The first three accounts to quote tweet it all do so within 15 minutes of the initial posting. Remember, this account had basically zero engagement beforehand, so an organic reach explanation seems unlikely.
According to Grok those accounts are @_NathanCalvin (General Counsel at Encode AI), @peterwildeford (Head of Policy at the AI Policy Network), and @DKokotajlo (Head of the AI Futures Project), all of which are up-and-coming AI-Doomer policy advocacy nonprofits.
The AI Futures Project website says it is funded “primarily” by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which says on its own website that it has advised Jaan Tallinn, Skype creator and one of the leading investors in Anthropic, to grant over $2.5 million to the AI Futures Project since 2024.
Encode AI says on its website that it is ALSO funded by the Survival and Flourishing Fund, which in turn says that it told Anthropic investor Jaan Tallinn to grant $516,000 to Encode AI in 2025.
And wouldn’t you know it, the Survival and Flourishing Fund ALSO says it told Jaan Tallinn to grant $2 million to the AI Policy Institute, the 501(c)(3) affiliate of the AI Policy Network, as well.
What are the odds that the first three quote tweets of Coxon’s post would all be major AI-restriction policy advocates funded generously by the same donor, who also happens to be one of the leading investors in, and a board member of, Anthropic, the company Coxon was resigning from? And all within 15 minutes of posting (two within ten)?
3.) Jacob Coxon doesn’t have much of a resume, but we do know that, in 2022, he got a $20,159 scholarship for the “long term future scholarship program” from the Good Ventures Foundation, one of the philanthropic vehicles of Dustin Moskovitz, a notorious AI-doomer who has spent tens if not hundreds of millions on policy advocacy to strictly regulate AI, while also being an Anthropic Investor himself.
It also just so happens that the 14th person to quote Coxon’s post was @MaxNadeau_ (27 minutes after posting) who is the program officer for the Technical AI Safety team at Coefficient Giving, another of Moskovitz’s philanthropic spending vehicles. Max is not a frequent poster, his last posts before quoting Coxon were before Labor Day, but he was remarkably quick off the mark for this one.
4.) Basically every major Democrat politician and candidate has suddenly glommed on to this post, and conveniently, as the people cry out foe answers, Bernie Sanders already has a bill written to “ban super intelligence” and regulate AI into oblivion, and will be releasing later this week. The bill, among many other things, will create “a new cabinet-level federal agency to safeguard the public from the dangers of artificial intelligence” that will be “advised by an Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board comprised of experts on artificial intelligence.” Do you think, perhaps, Anthropic and its many investors who fund AI policy advocacy might have interest in getting to place a pet “expert” on the board of an entity that dictates what AI is and isn’t allowed to do? And isn’t it fortuitous that this whistleblower came forward with his oh-so scary stories so close in proximity to the release of the most radical piece of AI legislation ever introduced?
These posts give me the ick. Yes, some bad things will come of AI. Probably something quite bad will eventually happen.
But if your plan to stop that is "everyone should just do XYZ" then your plan sucks and you're a moron.
Everyone will never "just do XYZ."
It's like saying we should all "just get along."
Resigning with an extravagant twitter post is pathetic. You worked at the lab, which means you were one of a handful of a few thousand people in a position to do something about it.
If you believe this is EXISTENTIAL FOR HUMANITY then stay in the seat and do everything you can to change it. Get fired if you have to. Get arrested if you have to, if your belief is really that strong!
Don't resign and farm twitter clout.
These posts give me the ick. Yes, some bad things will come of AI. Probably something quite bad will eventually happen.
But if your plan to stop that is "everyone should just do XYZ" then your plan sucks and you're a moron.
Everyone will never "just do XYZ."
It's like saying we should all "just get along."
Resigning with an extravagant twitter post is pathetic. You worked at the lab, which means you were one of a handful of a few thousand people in a position to do something about it.
If you believe this is EXISTENTIAL FOR HUMANITY then stay in the seat and do everything you can to change it. Get fired if you have to. Get arrested if you have to, if your belief is really that strong!
Don't resign and farm twitter clout.
I've yet to hear an answer to the question of why Charlie Kirk getting killed is awesome but the average Palestinian who has like 99% of the same social opinions getting killed is bad
Yeah these retards can't think beyond what happens if the women keeps the baby. They can't imagine the day to day suffering of taking care of an unwanted or unaffordable baby is cruel for all parties involved.
People that say they're "pro life" aren't really pro life though. They don't care about the severe risk to the woman, don't care about the lives of kids suffering in state care because they weren't wanted, don't care about kids suffering because parents can't afford them
@gloomerthoughts@asscastle5000@yiboable@sawyerfagan yeah coz you lot are not exposed to real problem, you think this "depressed" gimmick is used by those people in warzone country? begging to be victims at all costs, autist.
They are bunch of cucks lol, sees nothing wrong with their favourite club getting fucked inside out and keep making the fuckers happy by giving them money.
United fans will never empty this stadium to protest against INEOS and Glazers
Bunch of cowards 😤, they keep on complaining on social media and sing "Glazers out" gor 5 minutes during the game then they keep quiet.
Still giving glazers and INEOS money to eat