Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐Come and visit London’s Home of Trophies. 🏆
Book your Stadium Tour at Stamford Bridge now. ⭐️⭐️
That Palmer and Neto sub was so unnecessary. Now the game is level, Chelsea’s could have still stood a chance.
Left Pedro who can’t lead a press and brought in Tosin to do what? Could have brought on Gusto who has legs to run in transitions
Your argument is valid but reducing prices of old stock is not equal to making losses. On the contrary gains are even possible.
For example we have this iPhone we bought - when the $1 was around GH₵ 15.5 - selling for GH₵ 12,400, that’s 12,400/15.5 = $ 800
Today we are selling for GH₵ 11,500, let’s peg $1 at GH₵ 13.5, that’s 11,500/13.5 = $ 851.852
The whole point of currency appreciation is to be able to do more with less money but there are numerous factors controlling pricing and purchasing power.
You’ll get less GH₵ from selling old stock at reduced prices but if you’re buying in $ the example above shows the business is still growing and making profit.
This is not a bulletproof argument, just a simple example of how reducing prices of old stock doesn’t necessarily translate into losses.
Your views and opinions are welcome
👨🏾🍳🇬🇭: this no need me. What are the facts of the matter? Why was the seat of Government & the president amplifying the feed(s) of a private media broadcaster when the state media broadcaster exist for the same reason? You’ve been quiet about that🤷🏿♂️