stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai

@BrashAndy

Hoping to remove the bananas from our former Republic 🕎🗽🇺🇸 ✡️ 🇮🇱 🐢🐦‍⬛

Wherever @articlesofunity is

Joined August 2020

1.2K Following

375 Followers

14.6K Posts

Pinned Tweet

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

over 2 years ago

That which stood for our ancestors applies to us as well. For it was not only one individual who stood up against us to destroy us. Rather, in every generation they stand up against us to destroy us. But the Holy One, Blessed Be He, redeems us from their hands.

David Shor

@DYShor

over 2 years ago

Gotta love this Jewish counter protest in Teaneck NJ Seething vs Singing.

368

105

153K

621

BrashAndy retweeted

Heritage Foundation @Heritage

1 day ago

Right-wing extremism is so uncommon that left-wing extremists have to fund it.

417

21K

13M

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

14 days ago

https://t.co/V0NENF8j0A

BrashAndy retweeted

Creative Deduction

@CreativeDeduct

15 days ago

By the 1930s many Western intellectuals reluctantly realised that classical Marxism had failed and the proletariat wasn’t revolting. But then a group of exiled German Marxists led by Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse decided to change the battlefield. Instead of economics, they targeted the “cultural superstructure”: family, religion, tradition, sexual norms and the very idea of objective truth. Their weapon was Critical Theory - a relentless campaign of negative criticism designed to portray every Western institution as inherently oppressive and capitalism as not just economically flawed, but psychologically and morally corrupt. Marcuse gave the strategy its most powerful tactical manual in his 1965 essay “Repressive Tolerance”: true liberation, he argued, required “liberating tolerance” - tolerance only for progressive ideas and outright intolerance for conservative or “regressive” ones. Free speech, in other words, was only legitimate when it served the revolution. The intellectual poison of the Frankfurt School was extraordinarily influential and as its graduates and intellectual heirs colonised universities, media, NGOs and corporate HR departments, Critical Theory evolved into today’s identity politics, DEI mandates and cancel culture - a cultural Marxism that attacks the individual in the name of group grievance. What began with a small circle of German émigrés in the 1930s now shapes the moral vocabulary of much of the Western elite. The result has been a softer, more pervasive authoritarianism: the dictatorship of the politically correct.

CreativeDeduct's tweet photo. By the 1930s many Western intellectuals reluctantly realised that classical Marxism had failed and the proletariat wasn’t revolting. But then a group of exiled German Marxists led by Max Horkheimer, Theodor Adorno, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse decided to change the battlefield.
Instead of economics, they targeted the “cultural superstructure”: family, religion, tradition, sexual norms and the very idea of objective truth. Their weapon was Critical Theory - a relentless campaign of negative criticism designed to portray every Western institution as inherently oppressive and capitalism as not just economically flawed, but psychologically and morally corrupt.
Marcuse gave the strategy its most powerful tactical manual in his 1965 essay “Repressive Tolerance”: true liberation, he argued, required “liberating tolerance” - tolerance only for progressive ideas and outright intolerance for conservative or “regressive” ones. Free speech, in other words, was only legitimate when it served the revolution.
The intellectual poison of the Frankfurt School was extraordinarily influential and as its graduates and intellectual heirs colonised universities, media, NGOs and corporate HR departments, Critical Theory evolved into today’s identity politics, DEI mandates and cancel culture - a cultural Marxism that attacks the individual in the name of group grievance. What began with a small circle of German émigrés in the 1930s now shapes the moral vocabulary of much of the Western elite. The result has been a softer, more pervasive authoritarianism: the dictatorship of the politically correct.

389

263K

Who to follow

Jimothy Laheyothy

@jimlahey333

I'm a computer scientist, so basically am a problem solver. I love the outdoors, but also computers. I've lived a hell of a life and love it!

Greshdon

@LordGreshdon

PC gamer. Anti-state. Learning Latin. Not the brightest bulb in the pack, but not the dimmest, either.

CoryC379🗽

@SparkyCCline

these days are different

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

15 days ago

https://t.co/lB85lpE3HJ

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

16 days ago

https://t.co/mz7kgWTzJh

BrashAndy retweeted

John Spencer

@SpencerGuard

19 days ago

Absurd Claims of Dog Rape and Genocide. I see a correlation between those who believe absurd claims like dogs were trained to rape Palestinians and those who believe and insist Israel committed genocide in Gaza. Both claims collapse under scrutiny and mountains of contrary evidence. One ignores basic physiology and science, including the reality that dogs cannot rape humans in the way being alleged. The other disregards the legal definition of genocide, which requires intent to destroy a people, alongside repeated public statements by Israeli political and military leaders after October 7 that the war was against Hamas, not the people of Gaza. It also requires evidence of actions taken to fulfill that intent, yet accusers dismiss Israel’s documented actions to mitigate civilian harm, facilitate aid, move civilians from combat zones, and even vaccinate Gaza’s population during active war under conditions no military has ever faced. It further ignores that even critics of Israel’s campaign have acknowledged civilian-to-combatant casualty ratios that are historically low for dense urban warfare against an entrenched enemy purposely embedded among civilians. What connects these beliefs is not evidence, but a double standard in how definitions, laws, reason, science, and even common sense are applied. Facts that would invalidate the accusation are dismissed because the conclusion comes first: Israelis are uniquely evil. And that demonization rarely stops with Israelis alone. It often extends to Jews broadly, regardless of any personal connection to the conflict. I see this less as a dispute over evidence and more as an effort to delegitimize Israel’s existence through accusations that do not withstand logical, factual, or legal scrutiny.

SpencerGuard's tweet photo. Absurd Claims of Dog Rape and Genocide. I see a correlation between those who believe absurd claims like dogs were trained to rape Palestinians and those who believe and insist Israel committed genocide in Gaza.

Both claims collapse under scrutiny and mountains of contrary evidence. One ignores basic physiology and science, including the reality that dogs cannot rape humans in the way being alleged. The other disregards the legal definition of genocide, which requires intent to destroy a people, alongside repeated public statements by Israeli political and military leaders after October 7 that the war was against Hamas, not the people of Gaza. It also requires evidence of actions taken to fulfill that intent, yet accusers dismiss Israel’s documented actions to mitigate civilian harm, facilitate aid, move civilians from combat zones, and even vaccinate Gaza’s population during active war under conditions no military has ever faced. It further ignores that even critics of Israel’s campaign have acknowledged civilian-to-combatant casualty ratios that are historically low for dense urban warfare against an entrenched enemy purposely embedded among civilians.

What connects these beliefs is not evidence, but a double standard in how definitions, laws, reason, science, and even common sense are applied. Facts that would invalidate the accusation are dismissed because the conclusion comes first: Israelis are uniquely evil. And that demonization rarely stops with Israelis alone. It often extends to Jews broadly, regardless of any personal connection to the conflict. I see this less as a dispute over evidence and more as an effort to delegitimize Israel’s existence through accusations that do not withstand logical, factual, or legal scrutiny.

182

687

199

124K

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

18 days ago

https://t.co/ObgRLX6y3i

BrashAndy retweeted

Ihtesham Ali

@ihtesham2005

19 days ago

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

ihtesham2005's tweet photo. A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper.

Her name is Audrey van der Meer.

She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth.

The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time.

Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen.

Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task.

When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once.

The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected.

When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely.

Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG.

Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events.

The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem.

Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next.

Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve.

Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews.

Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad.

Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page.

A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched.

The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall.

The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down.

The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page.

That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it.

Two studies. Two countries. Same answer.

Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast.

Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth.

You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick.

The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew.

Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

121K

45K

62K

10M

BrashAndy retweeted

LHGrey™️

@grey4626

20 days ago

Introduction I never wanted to write this piece. I resisted it with every intellectual instinct I possess, telling myself the spectacle was too beneath serious consideration to warrant the expenditure of a single syllable. Let the grift burn itself out in its own algorithmic fever, I thought. Let the clickbait whores chase their bag until the market for medieval pathology finally saturates and collapses under the sheer weight of its intellectual dishonesty. But I am fed up. I am so fucking fed up with the clickbait antisemitic business...this slick, highly monetized, and lethally effective siege of humanity’s oldest and most corrosive toxin...that the threshold of dignified silence has been obliterated. What was once a fringe pathology confined to basement manifestos has professionalized, scaled, and gone mainstream, warping otherwise intelligent minds into unwitting propagandists for regimes that have spent nearly half a century butchering American interests while the podcasters smirk about “the Jews dragging us into war.” This is not a topic I relish. This is the first time I have addressed it directly, and it will be the last. My god, the ridiculousness of it all...the shameless inversion of history, the envy-driven scapegoating dressed up as “pattern noticing,” the casual laundering of blood libel into subscription revenue...has finally compelled me to break cover. What follows is not written for clicks, clout, or catharsis. It is a single, unsparing, forensic diagnosis of the plague: ancient venom meets brand-new business model. Consider it Grey’s reluctant but necessary incision into the rot. After this, I return to worthier ground. The grift, however, will not disappear on its own. It must be named, eviscerated, and starved of the oxygen of unchallenged acceptance. https://t.co/i5lVyiJLNt

259

905

601

95K

BrashAndy retweeted

Brivael Le Pogam

@brivael

21 days ago

Aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. La déconstruction est le virus mental le plus efficace jamais conçu contre une civilisation. Il a été fabriqué en France entre 1966 et 1980 par trois hommes : Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze. Il a été exporté aux États-Unis, hybridé avec le puritanisme racial américain, et il est revenu trente ans plus tard sous le nom de wokisme paralyser l'Occident entier. Voici comment il fonctionne, et pourquoi il faut le détruire. La thèse est simple. Toute vérité n'est qu'un rapport de pouvoir déguisé. Tout texte sacré, toute loi, toute science, toute norme, toute hiérarchie, toute identité, toute institution cache en réalité une domination. Déconstruire, c'est montrer le rapport de force sous le vernis du vrai. C'est arracher le masque. C'est "démasquer". Formulé comme ça, ça paraît inoffensif. Voire utile. Qui n'aime pas un peu d'esprit critique ? Le piège est là. La déconstruction se présente comme une méthode. Elle est en réalité une ontologie. Elle ne dit pas seulement "interrogeons les normes", elle dit "il n'y a *que* des rapports de pouvoir". La différence est civilisationnelle. Une société qui interroge ses normes reste debout. Une société qui croit que ses normes ne sont *rien d'autre* que de la domination s'effondre. Parce qu'elle ne peut plus rien défendre. Plus une frontière, plus une loi, plus une science, plus une langue, plus une histoire, plus une biologie, plus une famille. Tout devient suspect. Tout devient négociable. Tout devient "construit donc déconstructible". C'est la première raison pour laquelle c'est un virus. Il s'auto-réplique. Une fois inoculé, il transforme tout ce qu'il touche en cible. La science est patriarcale, donc déconstruisons-la. Le langage est colonial, donc réinventons-le. La méritocratie est raciste, donc abolissons-la. Le sexe est une construction, donc choisissons-le. Il n'y a plus de roc. Tout est sable. Deuxième raison. Le virus est *non-falsifiable*. Si vous défendez une norme, c'est que vous êtes l'oppresseur. Si vous niez être oppresseur, c'est la preuve de votre privilège inconscient. Si vous citez des faits, vos faits sont contaminés par le pouvoir qui les a produits. Si vous citez la raison, la raison elle-même est blanche, masculine, occidentale. Il n'y a aucune sortie possible. Le système est conçu pour rendre toute objection irrecevable par définition. C'est exactement la structure d'une secte. Et c'est exactement ce qui s'est installé dans les universités, les RH, les médias, les administrations, les conseils d'administration depuis vingt ans. Troisième raison. Le virus s'auto-réfute mais ne s'auto-détruit pas. Si toute vérité est pouvoir, alors la phrase "toute vérité est pouvoir" est elle-même du pouvoir, donc sans valeur. Logiquement, la déconstruction se mord la queue dès la première phrase. Mais elle s'en moque. Parce qu'elle n'a jamais cherché la cohérence. Elle cherche l'efficacité politique. Et son efficacité politique est immense. Elle désarme ses ennemis et arme ses militants. Elle paralyse le défenseur et libère l'attaquant. C'est une arme asymétrique parfaite. Quatrième raison. Le virus produit des humains diminués. Une génération entière a appris à déconstruire et n'a jamais appris à construire. Elle sait soupçonner, jamais admirer. Elle voit le pouvoir partout et la beauté nulle part. Elle peut produire mille pages sur le caractère opprimant de Shakespeare et zéro ligne qui vaille la peine d'être lue dans cent ans. Elle a confondu l'intelligence critique avec la pose critique. Elle est stérile par construction. Un esprit nourri à la déconstruction est un esprit qui ne sait plus rien édifier. Cinquième raison, la plus grave. Une civilisation se tient debout sur trois piliers. La croyance qu'une vérité est accessible à la raison. La croyance qu'un bien se distingue d'un mal. La croyance qu'un héritage mérite d'être transmis. La déconstruction a méthodiquement dynamité les trois. Pas par méchanceté. Par jeu intellectuel, par fascination du soupçon, par haine de la bourgeoisie qui avait nourri ses prophètes. Mais le résultat est là. Une civilisation qui ne croit plus en sa vérité, ni en son bien, ni en son héritage ne se défend pas. Elle s'excuse en attendant la fin. Voilà ce qu'on a fait. Voilà ce qu'il faut nommer. La bonne nouvelle, c'est qu'un virus mental ne survit que tant qu'on lui cède l'autorité du discours. Il meurt dès qu'on cesse de jouer son jeu. Dès qu'on réaffirme tranquillement qu'il existe une vérité, un beau, un bien, un héritage. Dès qu'on cesse de demander la permission aux déconstructeurs pour bâtir. Dès qu'on refait. Dès qu'on transmet. Dès qu'on crée. Les bâtisseurs ont toujours le dernier mot sur les commentateurs. Toujours. Parce qu'à la fin il reste ce qui est construit, et rien de ce qui a été déconstruit. Alors aujourd'hui je déconstruis la déconstruction. Et demain je construis.

929

18K

11K

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

21 days ago

https://t.co/hWq2H6887p

BrashAndy retweeted

Nav Toor

@heynavtoor

22 days ago

Every "free" resume builder on the internet runs the same scam. They let you build. They let you write. They let you spend two hours picking fonts, adjusting margins, perfecting bullet points. Then you click "Download PDF." $15. Your words. Your experience. Your career history. Locked behind a button that says "Upgrade to download." You wrote the document. They own the export. https://t.co/5unSB7LA9q does this. Zety does this. Novoresume does this. Enhancv does this. Every single one. Zety is the worst. Sign up for a $2.99 "trial." Get charged $23.70 the next month. Automatically. No warning. Their Trustpilot page reads like a crime scene. Thousands of job seekers. Already stressed. Already broke. Fighting to cancel a subscription they never meant to start. One developer decided this was wrong. His name is Amruth Pillai. Indian. Self-taught. He watched millions of people get trapped by the same paywall on every resume site on the internet. So he built one without a paywall. No trick. No trap. No "free tier" that expires. No premium templates locked behind a credit card. No auto-renewing trial buried in fine print. He called it Reactive Resume. Then he gave it to the world. 36,000+ stars on GitHub. Almost 1 million resumes built. MIT licensed. Free since day one. → Professional templates. Every one ATS-friendly by default. → Real-time preview. See your resume change as you type. → Export to PDF. One click. No paywall. No watermark. → No account required to start. → Drag-and-drop sections. Rearrange everything. → Custom colors, fonts, spacing, layouts. → Multiple resumes. Tailor each for each job. → Share a live link with any recruiter. → AI writing assistant for summaries and descriptions. → 30+ languages. → Self-host with Docker. → Try it now. https://t.co/qih5d8FzaU. No signup. Here's the part the paid builders do not want you to know: 75% of resumes are thrown away by ATS software before a human ever sees them. Not because the person was unqualified. Because the format was unreadable by the machine. The paid builders know this. They put ATS-optimized templates behind the premium paywall. They know your free template will fail the scan. They wait for you to get rejected. Then they sell you the fix. Every Reactive Resume template passes ATS by default. No upgrade needed. No premium tier. The fix is free. https://t.co/5unSB7LA9q: $25/month. Zety: $2.99 trial. $23.70/month after. Novoresume: $19.99/month. Reactive Resume: $0. No paywall. No auto-renewal. No trap. Every feature. Forever. One Indian developer built what a billion-dollar industry charges monthly for. Then he open sourced it. Your resume. Your words. Your future. No scam in between. 100% Open Source.

111

155

12K

BrashAndy retweeted

Benjamin Ryan

@benryanwriter

23 days ago

NYU professor @JonHaidt, who has stood at the forefront of the movement to challenge academia’s culture of suppressing the free exchange of ideas, is facing a campaign to cancel his graduation address. https://t.co/4egRWmkpP7

benryanwriter's tweet photo. NYU professor @JonHaidt, who has stood at the forefront of the movement to challenge academia’s culture of suppressing the free exchange of ideas, is facing a campaign to cancel his graduation address. https://t.co/4egRWmkpP7 https://t.co/jcHl6u6nMn

246

460

341

845K

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

24 days ago

https://t.co/XAqOOWb9kt

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

26 days ago

https://t.co/9B9PvUCY6l

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

27 days ago

https://t.co/MZIFIuEAfu

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

27 days ago

https://t.co/LW2Zg4biTJ

BrashAndy retweeted

Jay Costa

@JayCostaUSA

29 days ago

🔥WOW - Another AMAZING Campaign Ad was just Released for Spencer Pratt as he runs for Los Angeles Mayor. Democrat controlled cities and states have DEPRIVED many Americans of PEACE, SAFETY, and OPPORTUNITY for their families. But it DOESN'T have to be like this! All it takes is COMMON SENSE to win over the majority of voters, even "Behind Enemy Lines" in blue states! GO SPENCER GO! Keep Fighting 🇺🇸 video created by @charliebcurran Well Done 👏🏽

293

12K

841

421K

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai @BrashAndy

29 days ago

https://t.co/3GDubH6i44

BrashAndy retweeted

Allister Heath

@AllisterHeath

about 1 month ago

My column: Antizionism is a totalitarian conspiracy theory rotting the West from within Many on the Left have embraced antizionism, a hate ideology with an eliminationist agenda that targets the state of Israel, and only Israel, for dissolution, projects upon it everything they loathe about the West, and comes with an entire, warped analytical framework. It is the new anti-Semitism for our times. Just as Marxists thought ditching private property was the answer to everything, antizionists fixate on the world’s only Jewish state, the abolition of which they believe to be the omni-solution to all of the world’s problems https://t.co/r8NY5furix

201

325

210

47K

stairway2andy #AmYisraelChai

@BrashAndy

Who to follow

Last Seen Users on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users