Olivia
Online
Oswaldian Enthusiast
@BringBackTheBUF
British Patriot. Remigration is the merciful option, should that fail, then...
Restore Britain.
Joined January 2025
65 Following
25 Followers
44 Posts
Pinned Tweet
@OswaldsTopGuy Remigration is the peaceful option.
@CumbrianFella_ It's unlikely you'll reach any of the people this is aimed at. It's the older generation that seems to be the biggest advocates.
@Luke_Jahn_ @GBPolitcs True stupidity? Your party. Stick to what you do best. You have no viable means of marketing or funding. It has been years and your party is simply a niche twitter party. You win on rhetoric alone. Rhetoric alone is not how we win.
Utter nonsense. Farage has openly called Mass Deportations a "political impossibility", has stood Bangladeshi candidates along with Sikh and other foreign nationals. Not only this, he has openly stated that white replacement is "Not a concern of mine". Meanwhile, Rupert has stated that "If millions must go, millions must go." Moreover, Rupert has stated "Illegal immigration, huge issue. The far bigger issue? Legal immigration. A nettle that needs to be urgently grasped." Restore Britain is the only party that will actively seek to reverse the demographic replacement of this country, Reform would only slow it in the short-term. All of my claims can be validated. Yours are built on misconceptions.
@RestoreHWBS @Steve__Hibbs Minor work. But important nonetheless. It is the compounding effects from deeds like these that will ultimately help "Restore Britain", great work. Rhetoric alone will only get you so far.
Even presuming they weren't a serious party (they 100% are). Would you not agree that the key rhetoric is EXACTLY what we need at the moment? We don't need a retreat slightly to the left with parties such as restore that will only SLOW immigration (by admission). We need a foothold on the right. We shall fake it until we make it, as all political movements do. If you don't believe in Charlie Downes (a prominent rising star who has done a LOT of good work, such as his work on the Rape Gang Inquiry), And Rupert Lowe (Man with DECADES in political experience) then that is merely your own lack of trust. Not an excuse to counter-signal.
You're misguided. It is a party of meritocracy rather than credentialism. People like Charlie Downes did not get their role simply by being in the game for years on end failing to do anything at all. People conquered entire territories in their 20s. It isn't a matter of age. It is a matter of capability. It is this capability that we strive to create in Restore Britain. The young, whether you or I would like to admit it or not, ARE the future. They are the people that will continue to see our battle out. Denying them that right will only push them further into inaction.
@real_shirelass No rigging. Just massive mind raping.
Firstly, I think the historical figure you base your profile off is great. The Jewish question was definitely warranted. The decadence of society during Weimar was definitely abhorrent. However, do you not believe that in a sense we would likely be better off had it not been for the second world war? Though crude, 6 million is a tiny dent. Millions more have come to Europe as a result of their failure. So what did they ACTUALLY leave us with? They left us with an ideal to follow. A movement. An aesthetic. That is all. And what did we gain in return? Far more race mixing and another reason for white people to be held in contempt, even the establishment of the European Union, which has done more to undermine our way of life than anything else could have. It doesn't matter who was "responsible" for the war, it happened, and we are left to suffer the consequences. I would argue it isn't that we "owe them", it is that we should have a deep admiration for their efforts. As for 2030, I think that's optimistic at best. Our society will continue to meme post until they eventually become extinct, or they lose their ability to do so. Our society has lost all conventional means of resistance. The vast majority of the future generation is intellectually rotten to the core. Utterly useless. Which to your credit, will make it easier for our children, and your children to seize power. However, 2030? I think that's far too soon unfortunately. We need to have LOTS and LOTS of children, and we need to have the means to instill the capability, and the desire of action within them, otherwise we just become no different to the apathetic generations in recent times before us. The sinking birth rate is the perfect time to swing the future generation to our side, we just need to accommodate the difference and ensure we have the resources to do so. Whether that be through legal means or not. You're welcome to come back to this thread during 2039 to say something along the lines of "I told you so!", but unfortunately I seem to be a bit pessimistic on this front.
The "National Rebirth Party" has no future. You will win none of your standing candidates if any stand for any election at all. Nobody even knows who you are outside of X. This is not me saying your movement is wrong. It's just too focused on filling a role too early to be filled. You have neither the budget or the reach to effectively communicate your movement. Stick to what you do best and radicalize people further to our way of thinking merely through continuing to upload to social media.
Holding true to your ideals is fair game. However, there is in a sense an argument that you provide greater value alive than dead. My main point was more so that you're a little TOO optimistic in the public. Assuming the Government did want to suppress these messages, what would be stopping them from removing them, just as they removed the flags. And what is compelling people to stop to read them? Your call to action certainly is what I think a lot of British people need to be feeling. But I'm afraid you're calling out to an indifferent society. The only way for things to change is either by force at the risk of alienation, or for us to somehow outwit the institution and made change from the ground-up. But this is time consuming and is practically placing faith in an outcome neither you nor I will ever see while we continue to be replaced.
@Microwavedshite I tilt my hat to you sir. I can only dream of reaching this level of autism. Bravo.
@skyvegas Probably the horror that is the mass rape of thousands of women and children by Pakistani men as exposed by the Rape Gang Inquiry. Or does that not count?
@AlbieDavietoyr @JohnKirkopar @RupertLowe10 A "Jew" that openly opposed the War in Iran and is calling for the ban on Kosher slaughter? You're beyond retarded. Pure engagement farm.
Well yeah, philosophy has existed since the dawn of time. Of course we wonder about it. Some will agree with it, and some won't, it does not negate the good our ancestors have done. Your point on "But what if they advanced as a civilization themselves" is rather silly to beg the question of. Most of these tribes were explicitly anti-scientific by nature and by culture, not to say that this couldn't change, but how many would die in the meantime while you (the merciful, clearly) would wait for such a change to occur while leaving them in their nice little pocket? Too much time. Expansionism is inevitable, ultimately, why do you think it's such a crime to sacrifice the lives of say 100 people for the prosperity of an unlimited amount of our descendants? If we have the greater means of better leveraging our own already established civilization, then why shouldn't we sacrifice the natives in such a pursuit? How many people now live in far greater living conditions? How many customs would remain unrealized in these countries due to your proposed policy of global isolationism? For starters, I can name several examples. Medicine, unified scientific culture, practices such as the Hippocratic oath, religion. It was not a matter of "waiting for that civilization to advance by themselves", it was being the driving force to make this change happen in an amount of time that would benefit the greatest amount of people in the future compared to the temporary "suffering" of the natives. You also say that "you accept immigration and even invasion", in which case I'd tell you that the reason we do so is because we have somewhat of a conscious unlike the 3rd world barbarians that are being diverted to our countries. People who per capita are more prone to behead and start mass rape gangs in our countries, such as the UK, where they shove glass bottles in the vaginas of minors (yes this is a real report) and attempt to traffic them back to their countries such as Pakistan, do these seem like civilized people to you? I wouldn't say so. It's not that we tolerate it. It's that we are afraid as a society to admit that (ignoring genetic factors) true assimilation is close to impossible, this isn't even exclusively towards black or brown people either, we hate many white countries too, like Albania, because they ALSO commit a disproportionate amount of crime. Ultimately, my answer is that the reason importing multiple cultures in mass is bad, is simply because a unified culture (or close to it), is what makes a country, well a country in the first place. In-group division doesn't lead to religious wars, dual loyalty, and even racial wars on all sides unlike the current state of affairs, which allows this (like Muslims voting based on religious interests rather than other ideological beliefs, or bias in the jury, job hiring practices and university acceptance rates (which is pretty tribal if you ask me), most white people remain blind to this due to the mainstream media. Ultimately, what is a country without a unified culture? An idea? A legal system? Politicians? People don't go to war for democracy. People don't go to war for the prime minister. People go to war for their own people, people with a shared culture, shared life experience, and dare I say... Shared appearance. White people are tired of being denied their own culture in place of multiple destructive cultures because it is the "correct thing to do". Ultimately, it comes down to lack of conviction. Only through exposure will people soon come to appreciate their heritage and the sacrifices and accomplishments of their ancestors, and the reason why we can't be wholesome people(s) who import every race and culture because we are "colour blind". Legal immigration matters precisely as much as illegal migration because it simply means this unified culture is being replaced by a culture that is clearly not working in their home countries. For those with histories incredibly aligned with ours, and cultures aligned with ours, and genetics aligned with ours, yes, I am willing to accept legal immigration, because ultimately it isn't the Germanic tribes that are acting as cultural parasites, in fact, we have been doing this for AGES, which is why Germans, English, The French have always maintained very close genetic information and cultures. The problems we see in society aren't a direct result of that. I'm not opposed to "legal immigration" as a system, I'm opposed to a system where black and browns who quite frankly don't care about what our culture has to offer are allowed into the country. And even if people who claim not to hold dual loyalty have children, guess what, their children will still view their heritage as whatever third world shithole they came from. You've seen it. I've seen it. They call themselves "British" yet they go on vacations to India to "connect back to their roots", they hold up flags of foreign countries rather than their own. That does not appear to be "integration" to me. That is simply the collapse of nationalism and the role of the state as nurturers of glorified livestock.
Nobody ever said that these moral atrocities never happened. Nobody said that these areas weren't inhabited. Just that the population density is not great enough to justify claiming the entire area of land. You're making a moral point. I don't entirely disagree. However, how many people will get to prosper for generations to come as a result of that effort to turn the land into a civilized pocket of society? Exponentially more. I would readily conquer an island with the potential to hold 10000 people if only 100 people lay claim to that land. If they are are able to be taken over by a group of other people, what is stopping their own people from staging rebellions against each-other. What colonialism brings is a global standard based on might, bias, conviction, and hopes for a better future no matter what the cost is. You may not like that. That's fine. I do. I appreciate the pure greed of our ancestors to spread the Western standard of society and intellectualism. How many of those people would still be living primitive lifestyles if it were not for the efforts of the colonialists? How many of those people would be murdered as the result of their own in-group fighting, or even famine. The "But my people were here first and thus they control everything!" is a subjective moral argument. Not an objective one. I am willing to look past the atrocities of my ancestors during times when I was not even alive. I accept that imperfection as it served a greater purpose. Can you? Will you? Or will you simply whine about something that is out of your control for years to come?
@Haroooongxso7 @ZoomerHistorian Well yeah... That's kind of the point... Is it not...? If every so-called native had "the rights" to the entire landmass they inhabited, no progress would ever have been made, no countries would ever be formed, and many people would still be sacrificing babies today for luck.
@ZoomerHistorian https://t.co/rFwJO41icx
@OswaldsTopGuy Remigration is the peaceful option.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.3M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.3M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81.1M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.7M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.9M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.4M followers