RavenWatchdog

If truth feels like hate to you, keep scrolling. This page is for the real ones. Engaging + Stateme

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

🔥 🔥 🔥 🐦‍⬛

[Baltimore Ravens @Ravens]

The Next Flight takes off

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@BreannaMorello Stfu already.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@sheraz642828 @Bologna_Soprano @TheLaurenChen

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@Jamesh2874 @BreannaMorello “That's exactly what the black's do every time one gets killed by a white person no matter what the circumstances so fuck off”

You sound retarded stfu.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@goldboob @TheLaurenChen You right now.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@Levi50539482386 @Bologna_Soprano @TheLaurenChen Is this the best you’ve got?

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

“Numbers don’t lie.”

Cool. Which numbers?

Every time someone asks that question, the conversation turns into “per capita,” “13%,” “low IQ,” and then nobody can actually explain the dataset, methodology, limitations, or what the numbers are measuring.

If your argument was as strong as you think it is, you wouldn’t need catchphrases. You’d just answer the question.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@ANormalAccount7 @TheLaurenChen Is that you?

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@TRUMPGIRL_STL The real thugs.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

You spend an awful lot of time talking about IQ for someone who can’t put together a coherent argument.

Every reply is racial insults, clown emojis, all caps, screenshots you don’t understand, and a new subject every five minutes. Shoplifting, per capita, IQ, DNA, candy bowls… you’ve been all over the map.

If you’re the genius in this conversation, it’s a pretty strong argument against intelligence.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@solana_god_kr @TheLaurenChen

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@Levi50539482386 @Bologna_Soprano @TheLaurenChen Should I be offended?

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@Gossarian @PONY_Official Then we’re mostly in agreement. My point was never that the chart proves anything. My point was that people keep posting cropped statistics without context and then pretending they prove a racial narrative.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

This is amazing.

You posted a chart that literally says arrest data “does not measure actual crime rates,” then immediately used it to claim it proves actual crime rates.

You spent six hours calling everyone else dumb just to disagree with your own source.

That’s an impressive achievement.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

Congratulations, you’ve now gone from shoplifting to arrest data to per capita to IQ to DNA.

At this rate we’ll be discussing dinosaurs by tomorrow.

Nobody claimed DNA changed. The question was why you abandoned the original discussion and started posting a 2006 IQ paper instead of defending your claim about shoplifting statistics.

Can you answer that without changing the subject again?

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

Nobody is confused about per capita. Your candy analogy assumes you already know exactly how many poisonous candies are in each bowl. My question has been where those numbers came from in the first place. Arrests? Convictions? Victimization surveys? Self reports?

You keep explaining the division while avoiding the dataset.

Also, are you capable of answering a question without the insults? I’ve asked the same thing repeatedly and all you’ve done is post memes, candy bowls, chimp pictures, and name calling. If your argument is as strong as you think it is, just answer the question.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

Interesting. We went from shoplifting statistics, to arrest data, to per capita rates, and now to a 2006 IQ paper. That’s usually what happens when the original argument stops working. If we’re discussing shoplifting, let’s discuss shoplifting. If we’re discussing IQ, then explain what IQ has to do with your original claim.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@T_Fins1 @george200098 @TheLaurenChen Notice how every time I ask a question, you answer with an insult instead of a methodology. If your argument was as strong as you think it is, you wouldn’t need “dumb fuck,” “sub saharan,” and five laughing emojis to carry it.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

So we’re up to three replies and you’ve still only posted arrest statistics from different places. I already acknowledged arrest data exists. The question was whether arrest data automatically proves every conclusion you’re trying to draw from it. Reposting arrest data for the fourth time won’t answer that.

[RavenWatchdog @Broad_89]

@KingKP123 @WorstProphet9 @TheLaurenChen You’ve gone from “FBI stats” to “Table 43” to a third party website summarizing Table 43. That’s still arrest data. Posting the same dataset in three different formats isn’t a new argument.