Copperhead

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@DakdaR22 I’ve heard this for years.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@MarioNawfal Oh, he’s totally Russian.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@nexta_tv This is an old European plan. It still is their plan. They originally called for a 20-30 year war where Russia would be defeated and carved up. Then again, the west has a history of planning country maker and failing.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@AYTOarchive That was a wild time.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@Putinspoof I like the b52, but Russia could shoot them down no problem in 1970.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@_JakubJanda When was this a secret?

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@gunfanatics1 I thought those were junk until I shot one about a decade ago. What a pistol. I wouldn’t change a thing about it.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@Jessica72351918 Damn your stupid. And Russia would respond with a nuclear triad.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@ArmstrongEcon Ya I remember seeing that. This predates the war and it was Ukraine doing shit like this in Eastern Ukraine

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@republicofeu @Frid45 You guys ain’t putting shit on mars. You can’t afford AC in summer and heating in winter.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@WW3finalboss Russia expected a lot of this. That’s why war wasn’t declared against Ukraine. Russia has piles of men and equipment poised against NATO that it doesn’t want ground up in Ukraine. Russia knows this war is against powers in the West and not Ukraine.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@RealAlexJones The Dog is mans best friend (or a woman’s in this case). I hope that K9 is doing ok. I carry a gun where I’m at and if someone stabs my dog I’m shooting them center mass till that thing is empty.

[Coolhandluke @coolhandluke46]

@americannative_ The word is conquered cry me a trail of tears 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@nexta_tv I dont like this either, but in Ukraine you have Bandera as a national hero. Give me a break. All world powers do bad shit. Wake up.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@SenJohnKennedy I agree with this man on so much but he is far off on this. Working with Putin isn’t kissing his ass, it’s diplomacy. We have given a regime weapons, used them as a staging ground and that’s why Russia invaded. It’s like the west forgot what happened leading up to this.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@sarrah_bellus Your out of you mind, the rest of us would rather not have a war with Moscow because it would lead to the end of humanity.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@JayinKyiv Pretty crazy the Germans just keep finding all these bombs.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

1/ It’s striking how quickly “NATO Article 5” enters the conversation after an explosive drone is found at Leipzig airport — and how quietly that same clause stayed in the drawer when Nord Stream was blown up.

2/ Article 5 is not a slogan. It is NATO’s collective-defense clause: an armed attack on one is treated as an attack on all. It has been invoked once, after 9/11. It is not automatic. Allies decide what “assistance” means.

3/ In August 2026, an explosives-laden drone was found at Leipzig/Halle — a hub used for cargo linked to Ukraine and NATO airlift. Germany later blamed Russia for a “hybrid attack,” closed a consulate, and got EU/NATO solidarity language. That is serious. It is also not Article 5.

4/ Some commentary treated the drone as if the alliance threshold had been crossed. Official Berlin has been more careful: hybrid warfare, high threat level, sanctions and diplomacy — not a request to treat this as an armed attack on the Alliance.

5/ Now rewind to 26 September 2022. Three of four Nord Stream strands were destroyed by planted charges in the Baltic. It was the largest attack on German-linked energy infrastructure since 1945. Gas supply, prices, industry, and climate impact were all real.

6/ That was not a stray quadcopter. It was a planned underwater demolition of critical infrastructure in waters where Germany has rights as a pipe-laying state. If “attack on infrastructure = Article 5 talk,” that event was the bigger one.

7/ Germany did not ask NATO to invoke Article 5. It investigated. Years later German prosecutors have pursued a Ukrainian-linked sabotage theory, with arrests and court fights over immunity and whether the pipes were “civilian objects.” The politics stayed forensic, not Alliance-wide.

8/ That contrast is the point. When the suspected author is Russia, the rhetoric escalates toward alliance language. When the suspected author is inconvenient — a partner Germany arms and funds — the same category of sabotage is treated as a crime scene, not a casus foederis.

9/ You can believe Russia ran Leipzig and still notice the double standard. You can also note that a failed drone at an airport and a successful multi-pipeline demolition are not legally identical. Thresholds matter. Attribution matters. Who gets named matters more than officials admit.

10/ Article 5 is supposed to be a last-resort deterrent, not a mood. If every hybrid incident “screams Article 5,” the clause either gets cheapened or never used when the damage is largest. Nord Stream showed the latter. Leipzig is testing the former.

11/ The interesting question isn’t “was the drone scary?” It was. It’s why one attack on German-linked infrastructure produced alliance theater, and the bigger one produced a slow criminal file — and almost no demand that NATO treat the explosion as an attack on all.

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@UltimoLegend Hitler the Binladen

[Copperhead @BroadwingNews]

@americannative_ Is that a native Robert Dinero?