Toji

Helping Projects On-Chain Build, Scale, and Grow | Strategic Advisor || Marketing Advisor ||| Frontend|Backend Eng.

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

The PIKUDAO ecosystem is a decentralized finance framework built around three tokens: USP (a yield-optimized stablecoin), PIKU (utility and governance token), and sPIKU (staked PIKU representing voting power in PikuDAO).

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@NOMADZxyz @DutchBlockWeek Check Inbox

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

Requesting $XDAI funds from the #Stakely Faucet on the Gnosis Chain blockchain. Request ID: NH0LROU4 #privacy https://t.co/WXXSXoYKau

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@valianttee @StudentByNature I tire 😂😂

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@dandeli090 @OPay_NG @OPaySupport @opaybusiness I de tell you bro,It was debited this morning. I’m just finding out this evening when I tried to make a transfer

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

Requesting $XDAI funds from the #Stakely Faucet on the Gnosis Chain blockchain. Request ID: ANMPWYYL #privacy https://t.co/WXXSXoYKau

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@clesaege @Talent035 We're open to be educated
How do we prove we're not a Sybil?
Will extra Video evidences prove it?

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@clesaege @Valkyrie090 @Talent035 @dandeli090 @Kleros_io @proofofhumanity @nachikeighth I'm aware of the situation
No one is impersonating anyone, if that's the case they wouldn't ask for a call at a later time

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@clesaege @Valkyrie090 @Talent035 @dandeli090 @Kleros_io @proofofhumanity @nachikeighth This is invasion of privacy.
You can't take screenshots of someone without their consent.

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

That is Ning, and Ning has been opposing newbies by delaying the crowdfunding process till they fund theirselves and then challenges their account with well curated evidences which shows good knowledge of the policies.
This is bullying.
@clesaege @nachikeighth

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

🚨 POTENTIAL SCAM ALERT.

This is Ning
An admin in the Kleros server and also in @proofofhumanity community.

[Zapata_web @Talent035]

I want to address the claims being made against my community, because the narrative being pushed is misleading and ignores the onboarding structure the project itself encouraged participants to follow.

I taught these people about Proof of Humanity. Most are students. Most were new to crypto. I funded some from my own wallet and sent fees in batches during classes and live sessions. I walked them through registration step-by-step on calls. They registered together because I guided them together. That's what teaching looks like. The project also funds some who queue and fill the crowdfunding form. After the airdrop, I showed them how to withdraw. They withdrew almost at the same time because they learned from me at the same time.

The wallets being grouped together are not evidence of Sybil behavior on their own. Most of the cited "connections" come from operational patterns that were openly common within the campaign. Shared gas sponsorship, similar wallet activity timing, multi-hop funding paths, and repeated PoH interaction patterns are all natural outcomes of following the exact onboarding structure encouraged by admins and community guides. Correlation alone is not proof of coordinated abuse.

What concerns me more is how challenges are being handled. Instead of helping newer users understand wallet analysis properly, some participants are weaponizing overly technical graphs, funding trees, and confusing evidence dumps to push narratives that many people in the community cannot even properly interpret. A shared sponsor or synchronized activation does not automatically equal Sybil behavior — especially when those patterns came directly from people like me, guiding real humans through a process they were eager to learn.

The team isn't helping matters. They don't offer direct help or support to help challenged victims vindicate themselves. These are new people. They don't know all the rules, both old and existing ones. They're being left to defend themselves against accusations they don't fully understand, with no guidance from the very project they trusted.

Now they're losing their funds and are being asked to appeal with extra funds for extra jurors. Jurors are chosen at random but more drawn towards those with high weighted staked PNK. The team isn't helping at the appeal stage either. A system where newbies are targeted because of ignorance and not wrongdoing isn't fair.

No direct proof has been presented showing shared ownership, automation, farming scripts, account control overlap, or malicious intent. Genuine users are being forced to defend themselves against assumptions rather than actual evidence. Following the participation structure that was publicly normalized should not later be reframed as grounds for removal.

If the goal is a healthy ecosystem, then accusations should be based on concrete proof — not complicated charts designed to overwhelm voters who may not fully understand the context. If standards are going to change, they should be applied consistently and transparently across all participants, not selectively after users followed the process they were shown.

My community will not be made an example of. These are real humans I personally taught. I won't let them suffer @kleros_io
@proofofhumanity
@zealy_io

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

This address (0xd14EB612C81e87C7861B458914ed78a1Dc1aB3cf) profile in Kleros courts shows how many cases this wallet has opened.
800+ cases with some dating back to 2024 and 2025 which could only belong to someone who has been in the project for long or a team member.

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@Talent035 Preying on new members in the community and in the DAO is totally wrong.
@nachikeighth @clesaege

[Zapata_web @Talent035]

I want to address the claims being made against my community, because the narrative being pushed is misleading and ignores the onboarding structure the project itself encouraged participants to follow.

I taught these people about Proof of Humanity. Most are students. Most were new to crypto. I funded some from my own wallet and sent fees in batches during classes and live sessions. I walked them through registration step-by-step on calls. They registered together because I guided them together. That's what teaching looks like. The project also funds some who queue and fill the crowdfunding form. After the airdrop, I showed them how to withdraw. They withdrew almost at the same time because they learned from me at the same time.

The wallets being grouped together are not evidence of Sybil behavior on their own. Most of the cited "connections" come from operational patterns that were openly common within the campaign. Shared gas sponsorship, similar wallet activity timing, multi-hop funding paths, and repeated PoH interaction patterns are all natural outcomes of following the exact onboarding structure encouraged by admins and community guides. Correlation alone is not proof of coordinated abuse.

What concerns me more is how challenges are being handled. Instead of helping newer users understand wallet analysis properly, some participants are weaponizing overly technical graphs, funding trees, and confusing evidence dumps to push narratives that many people in the community cannot even properly interpret. A shared sponsor or synchronized activation does not automatically equal Sybil behavior — especially when those patterns came directly from people like me, guiding real humans through a process they were eager to learn.

The team isn't helping matters. They don't offer direct help or support to help challenged victims vindicate themselves. These are new people. They don't know all the rules, both old and existing ones. They're being left to defend themselves against accusations they don't fully understand, with no guidance from the very project they trusted.

Now they're losing their funds and are being asked to appeal with extra funds for extra jurors. Jurors are chosen at random but more drawn towards those with high weighted staked PNK. The team isn't helping at the appeal stage either. A system where newbies are targeted because of ignorance and not wrongdoing isn't fair.

No direct proof has been presented showing shared ownership, automation, farming scripts, account control overlap, or malicious intent. Genuine users are being forced to defend themselves against assumptions rather than actual evidence. Following the participation structure that was publicly normalized should not later be reframed as grounds for removal.

If the goal is a healthy ecosystem, then accusations should be based on concrete proof — not complicated charts designed to overwhelm voters who may not fully understand the context. If standards are going to change, they should be applied consistently and transparently across all participants, not selectively after users followed the process they were shown.

My community will not be made an example of. These are real humans I personally taught. I won't let them suffer @kleros_io
@proofofhumanity
@zealy_io

[Trustyfy @trustyfy]

Crypto cards are having a moment.

Funny thing is, a lot of them still ask for the same old things:
Give up control,
Buy the token,
Hope it survives the next bear market.

Trustyfy was built differently.

Not to take custody.🔐
Not to make utility conditional.
Not to lock people into a system and call it innovation.

Trustyfy was never built to be just another crypto card.

It is being built as a better financial setup for people and businesses who are tired of old systems, tired of token-gated access, and tired of handing over control just to get basic utility.

Different by design.

That means more than spending.
It means self-custody.
Cleaner movement between crypto and fiat.
Real-world usability for individuals.
And business accounts for teams that need something more serious than fragmented wallets, patchwork tools, and marketing-led products.

This is long-term infrastructure for modern money.🏗️
A real alternative to traditional finance.
Not just for crypto people.
For everyone.🌍

For the underbanked.
For the overlooked.
For those who want a real alternative, not another narrative.

We show what works today.
Then we keep improving quietly behind the scenes and ship when it is ready.

Follow @trustyfy as we build around your freedom, not in exchange for it.

Your money, your way.

[Trustyfy @trustyfy]

The Trustyfy Zealy Campaign is now live.

And with it, our first 4-week Zealy Sprint is officially underway.

Learn. Explore. Understand.

Despite the name, this is not a race. Everyone has the same opportunity across the full 4 weeks, no matter when they begin.

Take your time, move at your own pace, and use the Sprint to build a clearer understanding of Trustyfy, the product, and the wider ecosystem.

125 winners
3,000 USDC prize pool
Join here:
https://t.co/yG0AYyzPov

Please only use links shared through Trustyfy’s official channels.

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

@Eze_Wilberforce @TrustWallet @AlmightyWhaler After being careless and approving malicious contracts, you don't expect recovery or investigation after being drained

[Toji @Brodaviktor]

This is peak 🔥

[Trustyfy @trustyfy]

https://t.co/Xab7xFzKDK