RJ Bub

33 yrs LE experience. Your background watching Law & Order isn’t impressive.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

If God wanted us to have an opinion on everything, he wouldn’t have given us the 🤷🏼‍♂️ emoji — Bill Maher

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@XavierBecerra These too?

https://t.co/K96MhsqCxy

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@Elex_Michaelson Does any of this peak your interest as a journalist? Or is your job to merely read what others write for you …

[cinyc @cinyc9]

Raman picked up a little there, too. But the bigger story is Raman's deep violet in the areas in and around Downtown LA on election day.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@Elex_Michaelson It’s not the counting (which is all you’d see in the Voting Center) as much as it is the voting process. We’re supposed to trust a super-majority D government to ‘save democracy,’ when their process invites corruption.

https://t.co/Sq4IsVfrD0

https://t.co/K96MhsqCxy

[Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD @houmanhemmati]

🗳️ Many have been asking me describe the potential signature verification loophole for Los Angeles mail in ballots.

It says: “If a voter is unable to sign, the voter can make a mark witnessed by one person.”

Here, the person drew a happy face & “witnessed” it with a scribble. That scribble isn’t validated as being a real person. No name, nothing.

While a happy face may draw scrutiny, a plain line would not.

This could hypothetically enable mass harvesting where the voter never fills out, signs or even sees their own ballot.

We should be told how many ballots show up without the voter’s signature.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@houmanhemmati @walterkirn @BoredElonMusk Exactly

https://t.co/K96MhsqCxy

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@WalshFreedom It’s not the counting, it’s the validity of the votes (and the voters) that need to be addressed. If you think this is the 1st time this woman did this, you deluding yourself. And how many of those previous fraudulent registrations voted?

https://t.co/K96MhsqCxy

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

I can’t believe anyone who literally has”Lie” in their name …

[Ted Lieu @tedlieu]

My job is made easier when trump officials say ridiculous things in the face of incontrovertible facts.

But @SecRubio didn’t just lie to Congress. He disrespected the American people. He thinks we are stupid and will ignore what we see with our own eyes.

November is coming.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@Justin_G0rd0n How many prior times has this woman done this where she wasn’t caught? How many of those “registrants” voted? If you think this woman was caught the first time she did this, you’re deluding yourself.

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[Richard Grenell @RichardGrenell]

Sending ballots in the mail to people who moved out of California years ago is corrupt.

Sending ballots in the mail to people who didn’t request one is corrupt.

Sending ballots in the mail to every address someone has lived in for the past 10 years is corrupt.

Letting activists sign up mentally unstable people for a ballot by using phony addresses is corrupt.

Not letting third party law enforcement officials check the voter rolls is corrupt.

Letting one political party control the entire process for decades leads to corruption.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@CNN “Baseless”?

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@ABC7 Including illegally …

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@LoriMills4CA42 “Without evidence”?

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

On a related note, doesn’t “gestating” and “non-gestating” parent make genders binary? Like “female” and “male.”

[Rep. Wesley Hunt Press Office @RepWPH]

🚨 New York Democrats just voted to erase "Mother" and "Father”.

Governor Kathy Hochul will be replacing "mother" with "gestating parent" and "father" with "non-gestating parent."

This isn't inclusion, it's insanity.

While New Yorkers battle sky-high taxes, crime, and failing schools, The state is obsessed with rewriting biology and the English language. Real parents don't need woke bureaucrats redefining them.

Reject this nonsense.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

Ignorance is bliss

[RNC Research @RNCResearch]

Hakeem Jeffries on Platner points to Chuck Schumer when asked about Graham Platner:

"I haven‘t followed it closely. I will continue to defer to Leader Schumer and Senator Gillibrand in terms of the best path forward in Maine."

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@GovPressOffice Because this ⬇️

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[Amber Duke @ambermarieduke]

NEW from @dailycaller on the NYT's catch and kill operation:

- A source tells @wupton that the NYT had two women prepared to make sexual assault allegations against Platner.
- Those details were revealed to Fifield, presumably to make her feel more comfortable coming forward
- They never made it into the story, allegedly being removed at the behest of NYT editors and Platner's lawyers.
- The Platner campaign was originally only given two hours to respond, but that stretched into 24 hours, contrary to what interview subjects were told

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@TomSteyer Every ballot?

https://t.co/tROlv8KHFa

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@ABC @CBSNews @NBCNews @AP @Reuters @FoxNews @CNN @USATODAY @FaceTheNation @MeetThePress @ThisWeekABC @NewsNation @jaketapper @DanaBashCNN @kwelkernbc @DavidMuir @NorahODonnell @margbrennan @NewsNation @ChrisCuomo @brithume @MarthaRaddatz @ScottJenningsKY @Gutfeldfox #ICYMI

[Lyndsey Fifield @lyndseyfifield]

I bucked all advice from my friends (and resisted my conservative bias) and decided to fully trust the Times journalists.

As they left my home they asked that I not talk to any other outlets and I insisted then and repeatedly over the following weeks that I would keep my word and only share this story with them.

But then the weeks dragged on. They kept coming back to us saying the editors needed more. I needed to go on the record (okay). We need more screenshots (okay). I met every bench mark they set, eager to provide more sources or evidence as needed.

After the story went up I began to ask them … wait, where are the stories from the other women? Where are their accusations of sexual assault? Why am I the focus? Why are there 11 paragraphs dedicated to detailing my work history (more than has been published about Graham’s by far)?

Why does it say “nobody could corroborate” when I offered them sources that COULD corroborate?

Why did they include an out of context quote from a friend joking “do not call Graham” after I called off my wedding? (Because she knew I would never).

Where were the screenshots they’d said they would use? Or the mention that I’d supported local democrats and that most of my family (and husband) are liberal?

The editors said it was too much, they explained.

The Times also failed to include any mention that I DID confide in multiple friends through the years that Graham had been abusive — long before he was running for office. Those friends confirm they told the Times so.

It dawned on me that this really was a set up all along. The journalists I trusted who convinced me to share a story I never wanted to tell methodically delayed and twisted this into a gift to the Platner campaign. Violating the trust of his victims. Shattering the trust I placed in them with the most vulnerable story of my life.

And at the end of my call with them I reluctantly accepted their insistence that this was still a powerful story and that I had done a brave thing. And I thanked them for all the hard work they had put into it.

Still fawning after all these years.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@EmmaVigeland Emma is, apparently, an apologist for domestic violence when it serves her purpose.

[RJ Bub @BubRj]

@LeonardFiles Just to correct your misattribution of LA’s Sanctuary City Status during the 5:00 news to the Federal gov. . The LA City Council has codified, in the Municipal Code, its own status as such. Reporting is supposed to be informative.

https://t.co/SO6R1OZczz

[Curtis Houck @CurtisHouck]

POWERFUL: @BUngarSargon SLAMS Graham Platner and Democrats lining up to defend him...

"Well, I'll just say my grandfather's whole family was murdered in the Sobibor concentration camp. Graham Platner doesn't just have a Nazi tattoo. For 18 years, he had a tattoo of the concentration camp guards on his chest, and he knew what it was. He knew what it was. And to hear people compare that to anything else in the public sphere in America is insane. And it is insanely offensive. These people who are defending him called me, and every other MAGA person a Nazi for ten years, because we voted for someone who we thought would improve the lives of working-class Americans, and now they are lining up and defending a guy who had a Nazi tattoo -- which he knew about -- for 18 years. It is so insane to act like anything Donald Trump did was anywhere close to having a Taunton Cup on his chest for 18 years. This guy is a Nazi, and Democrats are lining up behind him because they think he can win."