๐๐จ Transform your contracting business? Proven strategies from an industry veteran Joh Domingo. ๐ฐ $100M in contract sales. Follow us as we strive for $1B.
@RabbiPoupko@mauthausen Yes bitch, you know; "Never again." A special reminder for you. Nothing wrong with a Free Palestine Shirt. Highly appropriate to the situation as well.
@DaveSharma The Zionist lobby would have had the opportunity to cross-examine Palestine Action if they had not framed the testimony phase to exclude the anti-Zionist viewpoint. It is fitting that it only took a minimal pushback to expose the gaslighting of the mainstream Jewish lobby.
Look at the details of this atrocity.
These bodies were from an airstrike in November 2023! They are only now recovering the bodies!
Thank you @ShadowofEzra
Follow him too.
๐ค Share this post!
The largest funeral in Palestinian history is taking place today with the bodies of 112 Palestinians being laid to rest.
๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐จ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฆ๐๐ฎ๐๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ต ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ผ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐.
My big brother is the lead surgeon in an Israeli medical start up which has just succeeded in its first human trials. They are about to change the world in a way that no one could have ever even imagined. Millions and millions of peoples lives will change drastically and they will be able to live normal lives again. My only hope is that zero antisemites ever get to use this new Israeli medical technology.
112 martyrs. 44 children. 43 women. 25 men. Out of 308.
196 remain under the rubble.
An entire neighbourhood. In a single massacre.
May God curse 'israel', the IOF, and their supporters. May they live in fear, misery, and anguish. And may they end up in Hell for eternity.
The message is; "look how good we are to you, yet you still want to kill us?" What is really said; "Despite the depravity of our treatment of your people, we can still act kindly towards some of you." Why are they so suprised?
This is a crazy story about a photo that illustrates the depravity of Palestinism and captures the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians perfectly.
In 2008, Israeli superstar Idan Raichel, one of Israelโs most beloved artists, volunteered to perform for children from Gaza who had been brought to Israel by Save a Childโs Heart.
This organization saves children from all over the world, including Palestinians, and brings them to Israel for life-saving treatment.
After the show, Raichel took the time to pose for a photo with one of the children and his father, embracing a child Israel had given a second chance at life.
Years later, that photo resurfaced after it was found by the IDF in Gaza.
It turned out that the father was a Hamas operative, and the child Israel had saved, the one who was given a second chance at life, grew up to become a Hamas terrorist and was ultimately killed while fighting for Hamas.
Stories like this are why so many on the Israeli side believe the conflict is a lost cause. You can offer medicine, surgery, and compassion, but none of it matters if the next generation is raised to see murdering you as part of a generational campaign of revenge.
Mass funeral of 112 people in Gaza
This picture alongside millions will be a testament to the apathy, inaction, inhumanity of our brutal world.
We couldโve stopped it. You definitely could have. May it haunt the whole world.
Israel has committed so many shocking atrocities over the past 2.5 years that many forgot how it massacred over 300 people in a November 2023 strike on Gazaโs Al-Sabra neighborhood
112 of those victims from two clans were just extracted from the rubble and given a mass funeral
Tony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Brett McGurk and Kamala Harris all have this blood on their hands
I came back from Israel with a question I wasn't expecting.
Not about antisemitism.
Not about geopolitics.
A much harder one.
How is a nation supposed to live beside a neighbor that openly says it wants to destroy you?
๐จIsrael's style of "co-existence" in Jaffa, by War Minister Yoav Gallant:
His father stole a Palestinian home & squatted in it, even though a family was still inside. That family was forced to live with Gallant & share a bathroom & kitchen until Gallant took them to Ramallah & kept the rest of the house.
Gallant is narrating this with pride as some sort of a beautiful kumbaya story.
Yoav Gallant is named after "Operation Yoav"; a major terrorist attack which his father took part in. The operation saw the carpet bombing, ethnic cleansing & full destruction of 30 Palestinian villages, including my own family's village. All the Palestinian inhabitants were loaded on trucks at gunpoint & sent to Gaza.
Gallant was the Israeli war minister that called the very people his father ethnically cleansed to Gaza "Human Animals" & vowed to ban "all food, water, medicine, fuel & electricity" to the population his father caged in this enclave.
Gallant is wanted by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity & war crimes.
Thank you, Dave. I appreciate you reaching out to ask what you got wrong.
The clip weโre discussing is less than 90 seconds long. What Iโm about to do demonstrates Brandolini's Law: where the amount of energy required to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude greater than that required to produce it. Or, in this case, it takes around 600 words to correct 90 seconds of your economic fan fiction.
1โฃ Between 0 and 30 seconds
You begin by confusing government debt with the Future Fund and appear to suggest that the Future Fund can't exist along side Govt debt.
Theyโre different things. One can exist without the other, and in Australia they do.
Australia's Future Fund was established in 2006 with an initial govt investment of about $60B. Its first annual report, in 2008, showed assets of around $64 billion - not the $100B you suggested.
Then, at around 27 seconds, you talk about the Future Fund as though it ceased to exist (you used the word 'had' as in past tense).
It still very much exists Dave. In fact, it's grown every single year since it was created. Today it's worth around $270 billion, or over $330 billion once the other funds under management are included (eg Medical Research / Housing Australia / Drought).
So before we're even 30 seconds into the clip you've managed to confuse government debt, the Future Fund, its size, and whether it still exists.
Thatโs a lot of economic history to get wrong in under 30 seconds.
2โฃ Around 32 seconds
You then claim Kevin Rudd used the Future Fund to "flush money through the economy".
Again, thatโs simply false. The Future Fund wasn't used to fund the stimulus. It wasn't used to build school halls. It wasnโt used for any of the things youโre describing. In your defence, you do briefly flirt with the possibility that you donโt actually know what youโre talking about. Sadly, it was a very short-lived relationship.
The GFC stimulus was funded through government borrowing.
For context, construction approvals were collapsing, more than a million Australians worked in construction, and the objective was to stop unemployment exploding during the worst global financial crisis in generations.
You're welcome to argue that was the wrong policy (but you didn't). Youโre not entitled to rewrite where the money came from.
3โฃ At about 44 seconds
You say, "I might be wrong".
I concede you were correct during this part of the video.
4โฃ From 44 seconds onwards
You make a series of broad claims about the GFC response.
Yes, government debt increased. That's true.
What you omit is that Australia's stimulus largely went directly to households rather than primarily rescuing financial institutions, as happened in many other countries.
The aim was simple: keep people spending, businesses operating and Australians employed while global demand collapsed. It's known as counter-cyclical fiscal policy.
Whether you agree with it politically is your business.
The specific outcome for Australia isn't contested though - Australia was one of only two economies in the OECD to avoid recession during the Global Financial Crisis. There's no reality where that wasnโt a comparatively impressive outcome.
The money didnโt need to "trickle down". The entire point was that it started at the bottom.
5โฃ Government debt
Throughout the clip (and in life generally) you repeatedly return to the theme Labor is responsible for Australiaโs debt (which btw is comparatively low).
Here are the actual numbers of net debt added by each Govt since 2007.
> Rudd/Gillard: about $190 billion over six years.
> Abbott/Turnbull/Morrison: about $366 billion over nine years, around two-thirds of which pre-dated COVID.
> Albanese: about $75 billion over four years.
Those figures donโt support the story you've been telling people. And thatโs really the issue.
This isn't about getting one date wrong or misremembering one statistic. Nearly every claim in your 90-second clip turns out to be either wrong or misleading.
If you're going to publicly lecture Australians about economic history, the bare minimum expectation is that youโve first acquainted yourself with it.
Because once the errors have been pointed out, as they have been to you multiple times, every repetition stops looking like an accident and starts looking like a strategy.
Given your very public coffee with Angus Taylor last week, perhaps people are entitled to ask what that strategy might be.
The idea is that the accusation itself automatically disqualifies the individual from the position. Astro turf the allegation & public detachment pushes the process to its logical conclusion.
The ICC prosecutor Karim Khan, who issued an arrest warrant for Israel's genocidal PM Netanyahu, has been removed based on highly dubious accusations.
This came mere days after the US government vowed to "dismantle" the ICC.
The US empire wants to destroy all international law.