Well, that's it for me, I'm officially quitting Twitter altogether. You can follow me at mcfarlandwrites on Threads or Keith Burwood McFarland on Facebook. This account will remain active but parked and I won't be interacting with people or posting anymore content. Musk is death.
@BeingJWood Seems to be a big one. I wonder when @elonmusk will finally give up and sell the remains of this steaming shelled-out cesspool to Zuck? Obviously Meta would be the more responsible owner of this catered out mess & Zuck would clearly call it Twitter again & merge it w/Threads.
@justme59118286@PKikos The DOJ says the adjustments were driven by efforts to keep its website updated in accordance with its 2023 National Strategy for Child Exploitation Prevention and Interdiction. The changes were made sometime between April 21 and May 28. So expect replaced pages in mid August.
@lockhart_laurel @MarkHarrisNYC @SonoraSpectre No information was given to congress about what the contents of the Mueller investigation contained until the report was released, which Barr mischaracterized as exonerating Trump when it did no such thing. So no, that didn't happen, honey, you're misremembering recent history.
@lockhart_laurel @MarkHarrisNYC @SonoraSpectre They pretty much all work multiple jobs and pay taxes they see no benefit from, so I don't need to do any of that.
@lockhart_laurel @MarkHarrisNYC @SonoraSpectre I'd be fine with that,and it's more like 11 million. I want them. American industry and agriculture need them. I think that's a great idea.
@lockhart_laurel @MarkHarrisNYC @SonoraSpectre No vets were kicked out. Turns out that was a republican lie. Which I'd what you are depended upon as a follower to spread.
@lockhart_laurel @MarkHarrisNYC @SonoraSpectre It's against the law to share the information in an ongoing investigation. After the investigation is over and the case prosecuted evidence is no longer confidential. That's always been how it is. That's the law. That's why Congress can't see it.
@Adashel49901890 @JamesArthurMuel @HagmanDr@TheRichFromCali You know bots can't hold sophisticated dialog and insult you using complete, context specific barbs, right? A bot isn't someone who tells you exactly why they are dismissive of you for being dismissive of expertise. If anything, your content fits more with being a bot.