Unkown_User_70K

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@RadidDoitscha @WarMonitor3 Russia hates you germans.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@g0gool Hab damals 20G pro Tag genommen bei 114KG Körpergewicht. Es gab schon einen Boost davon hab aber aufgehört, weil ich dauernt aufs Klo musste und, ständig durstig war und Krämpfe bekommen habe.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@enableflash @schlennart1 They dont twist it, they just dont understand simple things like this.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@kimjongthunberg @schlennart1 Hairloss is genetic. If your follicles are not sensitive to it you wont get bald. Not that hard to understand.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@schlennart1 And they are right

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@Hapaboreacel Danke für die Aufklärung.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@lukasludens Den Tweet von Herrn Mayer hat es mir gestern in der Timeline angezeigt. Ich dachte das war Satire. :/

[𝓓𝓸𝓬_𝔃𝓮���� ✧ @doc_zee7]

Me refusing to sleep because i didn't get enough time to feel like human after work

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@RiloeGaming You just dont have the time anymore. Playing 4 hours a week does not cut it for a comp. game. You will be shit.

[Harrison H. Smith ✞ @HarrisonHSmith]

Holy shit. This is just as bad as the Nowak footage. What the FUCK is wrong with UK police?

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@swaguley In BF1 you cant even jump and shot at the same time.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@RubberduckyFPS Nobody on reddit ever complained about this.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@AmposterThe @swaguley @miztifying You can easily hit your shots 25m away if you are sliding back and forth.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@swaguley Well said I expected BF6 to be more like 1 or 5 gameplay wise.

[Swaguley @swaguley]

Saying that players who don't like certain movement mechanics in Battlefield because they're just "bad at the game" is a non-sequitur.

I agree, the movement isn't difficult, and killing players slide-jumping isn't either. That's not the issue.

The real problem is this.

- It changes the pace of combat and alters the feeling of gunfights to where they become less readable, and more annoying to play fundamentally;

and more importantly:

- It shifts the tone of Battlefield from the "grounded in authenticity" mantra Battlefield had, which players have come to expect from it in the market, to something much arcadier

I'm happy to support more movement options as long as they fit an authenticity and believability line, but it seems even asking THAT is too much for some reason.

We praise vehicle design when they move naturalistically, why is infantry combat an exception?

The heart of the argument here is about Battlefield's tone, which affects how the gameplay is designed, not because some players can't "get good".

You don't get players complaining about emergent movement mechanics in Rocket League, even from trash cans, because they expect it from the game's tone, Battlefield players do not.

And no, citing bugs like BF3's aim stabilization jump, BF4's various movement exploits, etc. as prooftexts to justify any and all future crackhead movement mechanics in Battlefield, doesn't work either. Should we also then bring back Battlepacks just because they were in BF4 too?

I get there are those of you that don't care about Battlefield's tone, therefore there is no "movement line" to cross, but you're ignoring massive swaths of players that DO care and will just straight up not play the game as a result, as you often recommend them to do.

A vast amount of players come to Battlefield to play a combined arms military shooter with the "appearance of realism without being a simulator" gameplay loop that Battlefield UNIQUELY offered as a middle ground in the market, but EA and DICE have abandoned that middle ground to trend chase other games. This is why it's annoying and there's so much complaining about things like movement and skins.

You can continue to attack the caricature of a 0.5 KD player crouch walking to bolster your position, but you still can't define a well-reasoned upper limit for movement mechanics because you DON'T have a standard.

An appeal to the skill gap is not a standard, and it does not define an upper limit for movement whatsoever. What then would be keeping DICE from adding wall running, double jumps, or even phasing through walls if it can be argued those could potentially take a vague amount of skill to perform?

The bounds are defined by Battlefield's supposed authentic tone, which has been erased in favoring of emulating other games.

If you just enjoy Battlefield's metamorphosis into a movement slop shooter like every other FPS out there, that's fine. We can disagree.

Just don't expect the franchise to be anything more than a cheap, more plasticky Call of Duty substitute going forward.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@loisalostgirl @splmib suger and oil thats why it has so many kcal

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@EMiggitsch3791 @Grundgesetzi @kuestenkind68 Schande über dich.

[Unkown_User_70K @Cabal_hunter7]

@Grundgesetzi Ich hasse die Boomergeneration. Die sind alle in den 80ern hängengeblieben. Das ganze Leben auf easy mode gelebt und jeder Boomer ist dumm wie Brot.

[Resko★ @Bloke_Baz]

Can't believe it’s already June . Time flies when you work everyday of your fucking life

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

Pretty much all of the prominent voices who supported the Iran War assured us it would be over by now. None of them will admit they were wrong. Even less will they admit that their initial assurances were based on nothing but their own wishcasting. This whole shitshow has been an enormous waste of time and resources and our country has not benefited from it at all. Its advocates have moved the goal posts repeatedly and have even to this day refused to clearly articulate what constitutes a victory and how we’ll know that it’s been achieved.