@tehjizza@roosterpotamus@thorku I'll ask one more time: What is the difference? This is what insiders do. I don't understand what the issue is. The point of the job is to be a conniving rat and she was one. Are you retarded?
@tehjizza@roosterpotamus@thorku Can you read? All teams inquire about players via "insiders". So what's the difference? This isn't any different than teams leaking to Schefter or rap. So what's the difference?
@tehjizza@roosterpotamus@thorku Again: what's the difference between this &what every other insider does? They're all rats im not seeing what rules could be broken. All teams feed insiders and insiders give that info in exchange for more info. It's a retarded job that serves no purpose. But how is it different?
@draftexaminer@LanceZierlein You're just saying anything to make it seem like armchair draft analysis is important and valuable aren't you? 53 man roster. If a quarter of your guys suck ass running wide zone but you picked them because of the "consensus" then a quarter of your team is actively hurting you
@donkmaymay@TFG_Football@BuckyBrooks Thank for supporting my point! So then why should a consensus big board made up mainly by youtubers with no access to medicals, interviews, or in-depth knowledge of future teams gameplans (or even basic knowledge of teams schemes) be taken seriously?
@TexasFanVY10@DraftVogel This leads into the point I'm arguing: Saying "Well if you just follow the consensus board you'd automatically be better!" Is retarded because youre stating that as guaranteed. You cannot quantify that with "career value" because you can't know how that player does anywhere else
@TexasFanVY10@DraftVogel Because names and players are what are put on the consensus big board. It sounds like you're thinking just to think here. I'll give you one more shot: Team "reaches" on player A via consensus. You can't definitively state that any other player in another universe plays better
@TexasFanVY10@DraftVogel I'm thinking logically within the realms of what is scientifically possible in this universe. You can't assign a career value and automatically port it into another reality and definitively say that the player performs at that exact level with another franchise.
@nooothewall@TFG_Football@BuckyBrooks Yeah I'm sure that's the only reason. Didn't James Pearce get drafted last year? Didn't Mike Green get drafted high? Most teams don't care that much if youre good enough at important positions to win them games. He was the 42nd out of 43 QBs last year.
@TexasFanVY10@DraftVogel Impossible to quantify btw. There's no telling player B outperforms player A in the same exact situation with the same team when player B wasn't drafted there. This is insane logic. Just because a guy is good with one team doesn't guarantee he'd be good with another