The safety of our children is the pretext for implementing a Digital ID, just as the safety of the elderly was a pretext for the government's tyrannical measures during COVID.
The Australian Army is under fire for teaching soldiers how to make primitive indigenous weapons as part of a woke cultural exercise in Canberra.
One Nation leader Pauline Hanson said they should be "practicing modern day warfighting" instead.
https://t.co/Kq6NSxvoia
Let’s not kid ourselves into thinking this is just about protecting our children. These are the same politicians, cheered on by the same media, who:
• Closed schools for months, locking children in their homes under COVID mandates;
• Supported experimental medical interventions like gender reassignment for teenagers;
• Undermined parental authority at every turn.
And now we’re supposed to believe they’ve suddenly discovered a deep concern for the well-being of our children?
https://t.co/GRiWVFSypP
@Keir_Starmer "There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
https://t.co/89CuU4WTf6
Think about this:
Your local fish and chip shop is held to a higher standard than Parliament.
If a business falsely advertises a product, it’s treated as a serious breach of trust.
But why is it, when it comes to political promises, which are far more consequential, that the standard is lowered, not raised?
Shouldn’t it be the exact opposite?
A business can face severe penalties for misleading customers about a product, yet politicians can make promises that influence tax laws, affect the lives of millions, and alter the course of an entire nation, only to abandon those promises without consequence.
Make it make sense.
https://t.co/quEzW5WoQE
The safety of our children is the pretext for implementing a Digital ID, just as the safety of the elderly was a pretext for the government's tyrannical measures during COVID.
"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
https://t.co/89CuU4WTf6
Think about this:
Your local fish and chip shop is held to a higher standard than Parliament.
If a business falsely advertises a product, it’s treated as a serious breach of trust.
But why is it, when it comes to political promises, which are far more consequential, that the standard is lowered, not raised?
Shouldn’t it be the exact opposite?
A business can face severe penalties for misleading customers about a product, yet politicians can make promises that influence tax laws, affect the lives of millions, and alter the course of an entire nation, only to abandon those promises without consequence.
Make it make sense.
https://t.co/quEzW5WoQE
Are parents truly so negligent that raising awareness about online risks is no longer enough? Must federal and state governments now legislate family life, drafting laws that would criminalise or prohibit children and teens from using social media?
https://t.co/lGlerUxpkP
In 2021, the Australian government considered a controversial proposal requiring all social media users to verify their identity using a 100-point identification system.
https://t.co/0WlqVtiaeB
African refugees complain to a Greens MP about being relocated out of the public housing high-rise where they have lived for 22 years so it can be rebuilt.
The video has sparked backlash from everyday Aussies.
Follow: @NoticerNews
Pauline Hanson overtakes Anthony Albanese as preferred Prime Minister.
One Nation is also now Australia's preferred party by primary vote, overtaking Labor for the first time.