Cameron Allaer

Jesus loves YOU!

Creator of BOS Trading Card Game @bostcg

My opinions are my own.

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@valiantcharge I gotta see more clips of this, if you run it again please post some stuff! :D

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Thedukeistheman @MarcusFidelicus I think your definitions here aren't right, not everything that requires a mind to exist is subjective.

For example, I think God made & sustains everything, and God has a mind. Therefore I require a mind to exist. But that doesn't mean that my existence is subjective 😅

(2/2)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Thedukeistheman @MarcusFidelicus Well if morality requires a mind to exist, and you're DEFINING objective morality as existing mind independently, then respectfully, that's begging the question.

Subjective means being a matter of opinion. Objective means the opposite, like 2+2=4 or God's moral character.

(1/2)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Thedukeistheman @MarcusFidelicus I'm not sure how one can make a positive case that morality is subjective. afaik, any argument for subjective morality doesn't prove that there's no objective standard.

But if the argument from limits works, then God's "subjective" morality is unchanging and perfect: objective.

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@MarcusFidelicus A perfect, unlimited, God would have moral truths, and this provides the best explanation for objective morality.

One of those truths would be lying. Lying is evil because it does not reflect God's character, which what "good" ACTUALLY IS.

I pray you come to know Jesus.

(4/4)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@MarcusFidelicus P4) The totality of limited things cannot be explained by limited things (This would be circular)
C2) Therefore, there is something that has no fundamental limits

On extrapolating what that unlimited thing would be like, the unlimited thing appears to be exactly like God.

(3/4)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

One day soon...

[Lexer @LexerLux]

every word of this paragraph is absolutely mindboggling

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

This is insane. https://t.co/C1PVl27KJm

[jaivin @jaivinwylde]

I put the entire game of Minecraft inside twitter.. with WORKING multiplayer 💀 https://t.co/dpCLo0PvLp

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@yhbryankimiq Hello sir! Have you, or would you, consider making some content defending the historicity of the written events of Genesis 1-11? I'd be deeply interested in reading or seeing it, thank you and may Christ bless you! :D

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@travelingflying Taya, can you please provide the objective evidence for why you think this could be true?

I say this with the utmost respect for you, out of fear that you will put yourself into a false religion. Please be aware of the following proofs against Mormonism:
https://t.co/ujPeRFhVEd

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@JankfessorYGO I played Adventure Quest as a kid a bit... Is it worth it to pick up AQW even though I'll have no progress?

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@vicsolhxos @Know_More_News Are you asking specifically for evidence Jesus existed?

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Athias_ @Know_More_News Even if the new testament was compiled in the 2nd century, defending that late of a dating of any individual gospel account is nigh impossible. Where would you date each gospel and why?

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Know_More_News There's a reason why apologists are not focused on defending Jesus' existence right now. They're focused on defending the resurrection, cuz modern historical techniques show Jesus was a real person. Now the question they're asking is "Does the resurrection explain the data" (2/2)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@Know_More_News There's no good argument to say that Luke and Acts were written as non-history. Using only those two books, we can confirm that Jesus was a real person, but the undesigned coincidences between all of the gospel accounts push the credence towards historicity even further. (1/2)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@gwowls (2/2) Importantly, "faithfulness" is not the same as faith.

Faith = Trust and heart-alignment.
Faithfulness = Living out your faith.

So we are not saved through faithfulness, since that would be requiring us to do works. Unity with God would stop being a gracious gift (Eph 2:9)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@gwowls 1. If faith is a work, then it would be an exception to the rule, and it would basically be saying "you are saved by 1 work".
2. But the rule is that we aren't saved by any thing that we do, or in other words, any work we do. (Eph 2:8)

Therefore faith is not a work. (1/2)

[Cameron Allaer @CameronAllaer]

@PhrogPollen Matthew 12 43-45, fill your heart with Jesus and it'll change!