Position 1 — Black queenside bishop/rook swap
FEN: bnrqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQk - 0 1
Totals: White win 3 — Black win 4 — Draws 13 (out of 20)
Position 2 — White queenside knight/bishop swap
FEN: rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RBNQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
Totals: White 1 — Black 1 — Draws 18 (out of 20)
So in fact no advantage, my option force more draw, your option produce more agressive game.
The difference of one game in favor of white here is not statistically significant, you would need 100 game per bracket.
@EmmansZero A series of 20 matches are running at 2000 elo for both configuration. Curious to see which one come on top :-). Your is logical, mine are to predict because I never have seen the doubling of the bishop at the start.
Because it was popularized by a famous French comic before the smartphone era. Mastering fighting intellectually and physically (which fit right in with Descarte's view on the duality of matter and spirit ). The concept is simple to grasp, what you are measuring obvious, and you start with a pop culture reference
They did not fell for anything, most retweet/reaction are just user who want for an low intensity and uncomplicated interaction 😏, with 300 K follower, he could just post a blue square with the caption : is that pink ? and get a massive reaction.
Just human nature and the bell curve in full display :-)
Looking at what I see around me in several field, the big winner of the AI race, are not the dev but the marketing company.
Producing the software became cheaper and easier, the limiting factor is now the access to the consumer.
@lordaegirion@jyriso Because they have a bigger audience that's all ;-) .
On X unless you pay or have an audience, you will be invisible. If you have a good post idea AND it catch some eyes, it will be stolen by the horde of lower/middle size account looking for content.
@jyriso It does not work :-) .
Don't be fool by the algorithm when you see recuring post pattern, its means none is effective. Except when posted by big account but then you have XXX reply and your will be invisible.
@tunguz That's surprise you? You can watch world champion/GM/IM on youtube.
They are clearly not stupide but if you compare to a scientist, high level politician, lawyer, lobbyist, coder, CEO, etc, you don't have the same feeling for intellectual dominance.
The Count of Anterroches
A bot that only starts attacking after you’ve captured a piece. I try to exploit this constraint to gain a positional advantage, but with its 2800 Elo it still punishes me heavily, even when I start with the initiative and a knight against a rook and the queen.
Camille lets you create this kind of bot and play with a handicap against an engine that doesn’t make mistakes :-)
https://t.co/U7sHBaiaa8
Yes, because creating something that will make people react negatively is easier then something that make them react positively.
Added bonus, something you like, you put a like, if you like a lot you will repost. Something that make you angry, you reply.
Hence the rage bait post epidemic.
For this specific issue, you could be more polemic while pushing a positive point.
What is move, not one of the big finding of using neural network to play chess? Magnus cited this move of the pawn on the side as something the new high level player must integrate in their game. Neural network find that moving this pawn early had huge benefit for the middle/end game.