Croissance à 0,7 %? Nous fonçons dans le mur.
L’économie canadienne s’enlise dangereusement.
Nous venons de traverser la pire décennie pour la croissance du PIB réel par habitant depuis la Grande Dépression, il y a près d’un siècle.
Au cours des dix dernières années, le PIB réel par habitant a progressé en moyenne d’à peine 0,6 % annuellement.
Et les prévisions de Bloomberg pour 2026? Un maigre 0,7 %.
Pourquoi le PIB est-il important?
Parce que le revenu disponible des ménages suit le PIB comme son ombre. Une croissance économique anémique provoquée par un effondrement des investissements signifie des salaires qui stagnent. Point final.
Les libéraux et les faux conservateurs ne régleront rien.
Le Parti populaire est la seule formation politique nationale qui propose un plan concret pour libérer l’investissement privé, stimuler la productivité et remettre plus d’argent dans vos poches :
1. Rendre permanente la déduction pour amortissement accéléré (DPA) – Permettre aux entreprises de déduire rapidement leurs investissements en capital et d’augmenter considérablement leurs liquidités.
2. Mettre fin aux subventions aux entreprises – Zéro subvention. Zéro sauvetage. Zéro fonds de développement régional.
3. Instaurer un taux unique d'impôt sur les sociétés de 10 % et réduire l'impôt sur le revenu des particuliers – Simplifier l’ensemble du système.
4. Abolir l’impôt sur les gains en capital.
5. Équilibrer le budget en un an – Réduire ambitieusement les dépenses de 65 milliards de dollars.
6. Déréglementer – Réduire la paperasserie. Favoriser une concurrence réelle et sans entraves.
Le PPC est le seul parti qui offre de vraies solutions.
The Odyssey will win many awards.
It doesn’t matter how awful it is.
Hollywood probably has the Oscar’s engraved.
It’s part of the Left’s continued push to destroy Western Culture.
The Greeks were the foundation.
From Democracy to Art to Philosophy.
The Left hates it.
THE BANKING SYSTEM WAS CREATED THE SAME YEAR TARTARIA WAS ERASED.
This is not a coincidence. This is a confession.
1913. The Federal Reserve Act was signed into law, creating a private central bank that controls the money supply of the United States. The same year, the 16th Amendment introduced the federal income tax — forcing every American to pay a percentage of their labor to the government.
Before 1913, there was no income tax. No central bank. No national debt. Americans kept 100% of what they earned.
Now look at what else happened between 1890 and 1913:
— The last references to “Tartary” disappeared from encyclopedias
— The Smithsonian collected and “lost” thousands of giant skeletons
— The orphan trains completed their final runs
— The last Kirkbride asylums were filled to capacity
— The World’s Fairs showcased their final “temporary” cities
— Free energy technology was suppressed (Tesla’s funding cut in 1904, Wardenclyffe demolished in 1917)
The old world operated without banks. Without debt. Without income tax. The energy was free. The architecture was inherited. The land belonged to no one because it belonged to everyone.
You cannot CONTROL a population that has free energy, free land, and no debt.
So you introduce scarcity. You meter the energy. You fence the land. You create “money” backed by nothing. You loan it at interest. You tax the labor. And suddenly, every human being on Earth is born into DEBT.
The Federal Reserve wasn’t created to “stabilize the economy.” It was created to ENSLAVE the survivors of the reset.
Think about it: Why would a free people voluntarily accept a system where a private bank prints money from nothing, loans it to their government at interest, and then taxes THEM to pay back the interest on money that never existed?
They wouldn’t. Unless they didn’t know any other way. Unless the generation that remembered freedom was already dead — locked in asylums, scattered on orphan trains, or buried in those ornate cemeteries.
By 1913, the erasure was complete. The last people who remembered the old world were gone. And the new system locked into place.
You are not free. You are a revenue-generating asset on a balance sheet. Your birth certificate is a bond. Your social security number is an account number. You are collateral for a debt that was created before you were born.
The old world had no banks. No debt. No tax. No meters.
Now you know why it was destroyed.
https://t.co/ghQi4yT3RU
🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS SAYS THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN DOSING GRAPH HE'S CREATED.
Not a new chemotherapy drug.
Not a breakthrough immunotherapy.
Not a billion-dollar cancer treatment.
Just one simple dosing strategy.
According to Dr. William Makis, this is the dosing framework he believes everyone researching repurposed medicines for cancer should understand first.
And it all starts with one number.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Before explaining why, here's the dosing framework Dr. Makis discusses.
📊 The Four Ivermectin Dosing Ranges
🟢 Low Dose: ≤0.5 mg/kg/day
Used for cancers in remission, strong family history, genetic predisposition, prophylaxis, and lower-dose protocols discussed in published case reports.
🟡 Medium Dose: 1.0 mg/kg/day
Dr. Makis' recommended starting dose for most cancers.
🔵 High Dose: 2.0 mg/kg/day
Discussed for very aggressive cancers, including leukaemia, pancreatic cancer, and some brain cancers.
🔴 Very High Dose: ≥2.5 mg/kg/day
Discussed in selected reported cases involving extensive metastatic disease or extremely poor prognosis, where temporary visual side effects have also been reported.
Now here's why Dr. Makis believes 1 mg/kg/day deserves the most attention.
After reviewing laboratory research, published studies, and numerous case reports, he says this is the starting dose he recommends for most cancers.
According to Dr. Makis, research has investigated Ivermectin across a surprisingly wide range of cancers, including:
• Breast cancer
• Colon cancer
• Lung cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Kidney (renal cell) cancer
• Gastric cancer
• Leukemia
One exception stood out.
Lymphoma.
Dr. Makis says he has found very little published research involving Ivermectin and lymphoma.
That doesn't mean it doesn't work.
It simply means the evidence is currently limited.
❓What does 1 mg/kg/day actually look like?
For someone weighing 60 kg (132 lbs)...
That's approximately 60 mg of Ivermectin every day.
Equivalent to:
💊 Five 12 mg tablets
OR
💧 About 6 mL of liquid Ivermectin, roughly one teaspoon.
According to Dr. Makis, that's where he recommends starting for many cancers.
Can lower doses still have an effect?
✅ He believes they can.
Dr. Makis discusses a published ovarian cancer case reported by Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The dosing chart lists the patient as receiving 12 mg of Ivermectin per day. During his discussion, Dr. Makis explains that this was approximately 0.2 mg/kg/day, placing it within the chart's Low Dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) range.
📉 According to the case report, the patient's CA125 tumor marker reportedly fell from 288 to 22 after two months.
That case is one reason Dr. Makis believes Ivermectin may have anticancer activity even at lower doses.
However...
He also believes the available evidence suggests the effect is dose dependent.
In other words...
Higher doses may produce greater effects, although more clinical research is needed.
What about the most aggressive cancers?
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia
• Brain cancer
For cancers like these, Dr. Makis discusses doses around 2 mg/kg/day in selected situations.
He notes that Ivermectin crosses the blood-brain barrier, although not very efficiently, which is one reason he says higher doses may be considered for some brain cancers.
He also discusses a case reported by Dr. Allan Landrito.
According to Dr. Makis, a physician with terminal gallbladder cancer reportedly took 2 mg/kg/day for 14 months.
He says her cancer eventually disappeared.
She experienced temporary visual side effects that resolved after a few days.
❓How high have reported doses gone?
According to Dr. Makis, he has seen reported doses as high as 2.5 mg/kg/day.
He references patients treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty who reportedly used those doses without long-term side effects, although some experienced temporary visual disturbances that later resolved.
One point Dr. Makis returns to repeatedly...
Long-term use.
He references the Castro study involving children with leukemia who reportedly received Ivermectin for six months without long-term side effects.
He also discusses anecdotal reports of adults taking it daily for more than a year without long-term toxicity.
So why aren't there larger cancer trials?
Dr. Makis believes one of the biggest obstacles is economics.
Because Ivermectin is an off-patent generic medicine, he argues there is little financial incentive to fund large clinical trials.
Whether future research ultimately confirms or challenges these ideas remains to be seen.
But Dr. Makis' message is remarkably simple.
One graph.
One dosing strategy.
One starting point.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Because the conversation isn't just about Ivermectin anymore.
It's about whether repurposed drugs deserve the same level of scientific investigation as newer therapies.
🗨️ Do you think inexpensive repurposed medicines like Ivermectin deserve larger, well-designed clinical trials for cancer?
🔖 Save this post so you'll always have Dr. Makis' dosing framework handy, and repost it to help others discover the ongoing research into repurposed medicines.
💊 Looking for pharmaceutical grade Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole? Choose @rxmeds_store. Trusted by thousands of customers worldwide.
#Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Oncology #CancerCare #MedicalResearch #PancreaticCancer #MakisMD #RxMeds
The cost of food in Canada is still increasing in Canada.
Month after month prices are going up in ways that are unsustainable.
Remember when Carney said Canadians will judge them by what they pay at the grocery store?
These politicians can’t actually do anything, they are useless to tax payers.
Mel Gibson: "You have to think about what comes next. Is there a next? Yes, there is. I believe there is. And it depends on how you live now… the beauty of believing is that even for your transgressions, you can be forgiven and you can be redeemed."
“55% are married to their 1st cousin”
“The risk of having an IQ lower than 70 increases 400%”
Joe Rogan simply can’t believe statistics coming out of the UK.
Canada needs to get some balls.
This woman absolutely nails the GoodLife gym kirpan circus.
Sikh man walks in openly carrying a religious blade, working out shirtless against dress code, filming in the change room… and the second he cries discrimination the gym folds like cheap lawn chairs and apologizes.
Meanwhile regular Canadian women still can’t legally carry pepper spray or a knife for self-defense without the cops treating them like criminals.
This is the insane two-tier society we’ve built.
Rules only apply to the people who don’t scream loud enough about their identity.
DEI and woke ideology didn’t create equality — it created a hierarchy where some groups get to ignore the rules everyone else has to follow.
Equal rights. Equal rules. Equal responsibilities.
No special privileges. Assimilate or don’t come.
That’s not bigotry. That’s how a functional country actually works.
#cdnpoli #CanadaFirst #WokeFail #CommonSense
📺 @thesovereignceo 👈