@DefiantLs THIS! This is my main issue with it, why didn't he just try to fist fight Austin? Why did he immediately went for murder? Yet somehow he's the victim? This isn't even a race issue, it's the psychopaths vs the normal people, yet they're acting like it's the former.
@gappayapa@DesjorsP@Proper_Memes@Keir_Starmer 1. Not everyone has a linked credit card
2. How do you think they would go about knowing that children are taking nude pictures and sending said nude pictures? The only way for them to know is if they have access to your camera, gallery, and messages.
@gappayapa@DesjorsP@Proper_Memes@Keir_Starmer How do you think they would go about doing that? The only way for them to verify people's age is by forcing them to give away their personal information to random tech companies, who'd most likely leak the data, or even worse sell it to god knows where.
@lean1347891@lifts_her_tail2@Hideo_Fufujima But you follow people who do sexualise furries. So you better pick up the pitch forks and start calling them dog fuckers, you know to be consistent.
@lifts_her_tail2@Hideo_Fufujima The hoops you people jump through to justify your hypocrisy is ridiculous. Either learn to separate fiction from reality or admit that you're a dog fucker (or in this case a rabbit fucker), no in between.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu You've been maliciously misinterpreting everything I've said, and arguing with that misinterpretation. fuck off if you're not gonna engage with my arguments.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu As long as it isn't stated in the TOS, the commissioner should be allowed to have a version without any watermarks. Legally speaking, as long as the artist is credited in the posts that the commissioner makes, there should be no issue.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu As I said as long as the commissioner posted it with credit, it shouldn't matter what other people do with it after, cause that is out of the commissioner's control.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu Never said that shit. Learn to read for Christ's sake. I said what other people do after the comm is done shouldn't affect the results of the comm. As long as the commissioner payed for and posted the art WITH credits, that where the transaction should end.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu It's a simple transaction, the artists makes the art, and the commissioner pay and post it with credit. If people decide to steal the art or post it with the credits remove, then that's just unfortunate, but it shouldn't affect the results comm, as long as you're getting payed.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu The same way how it's less likely for people to want to remove the watermark to steal art it's also less likely for them to repost without any credits. Anyway as long as the commissioner payed for and posted the art with credits, there should be no issue.
@imscaredofbugs@saekoiitadori@hirachichuu Even if that were the case, if someone wants to remove the watermark and steal the artist's art, there's nothing stopping them from doing that. Again the artist is selling their art, not renting it.
@EliazzoM@hirachichuu Maybe learn how to read, it might help you in life. The moment someone brought up the TOS thing (which wasn't mentioned in the post btw) I immediately stated that they were in the wrong. I'm simply stating my opinion on the matter of what a commissioner can and can't request.