This graph shows independent scientific measuring of actual warming, since the IPCC report was adopted, triggering global panic - and the Paris accord. It shows the IPCC projections compared to actual measurements.
In following years quality science has measured change, including taking samples from the atmosphere and plotted revised projections.
The bottom line (bold black) is based on actual results, showing a very different trend from the wild projections which the UN still base their premise on.
Instead of investing countless billions into a wild goose chase scam, designed to redistribute world wealth under the pretext of a carbon crisis, our government should fund credible independent research to establish the veracity of these claims. Costing a fraction of the price and protecting our primary industries in the process.
https://t.co/vBSOFUfAXg
@MarkHeath45 Agreed.
We are fighting for our great soul.
What is the point, if we lose it in the process?
And now he won't be available, if the globalist/bolshevik army activates. How useless is that.
I'm curious who his targets were. Did he stay away from Women and Children?
@ZackPolanski@elonmusk Once upon a time, local Jews opened the gates of Toledo from within. So the legends go.
Whether true or not, Jews ruled over the Spanish for 300 years at all levels of government, using Moorish arms to put down any dissent.
What are the odds, that they made a deal?
@saltyreigns Its probably a real event, it sometimes happens -- but it will totally be used to tighten the screws.
"never let a good crisis go to waste"
*Globalist Motto
I understand what's happening here.
perpetrators are given a statement to sign. They want to cooperate.
Whites sign the release, without dispute; Muslims say "I don't want it to say Muslim on there". So they strike it out.
Its voluntary. But what White person would think to demand they weren't listed as White?
Interesting - huh.
Most things make sense, when you think about them for a bit.
The problem with all of these independent commentators, is that they do not seem to have any leaning towards honest portrayal. They all seem so deeply personally flawed.
For example, the number of 250,000 is posited based on the official rape gang enquiry numbers - on the hotspots of where the outrage occured.
This number is based on an assumption, that if everywhere were equally bad - this WOULD be the number.
Now, every honest reader knows, that its unlikely it is this bad everywhere. But that is not do downplay the premise. The number is clearly staggering in scale. To argue about the number itself, or that its "made up" - is pure deflection. Because there is no excusing it.
And shows the problem of leaders reposting "meme takes" - without tempering it with the nuance that inevitably exists.
Its a problem, because it disenchants intelligent supporters, who become unsure of what they can trust. And Brits are very intelligent.
Understand this @RupertLowe10
When you say making - was he a perpetrator of CSAM?
Or was it Ai.
I appreciate your exposes; but we have to become nuanced if we want any chance of imposing truly severe sanctions (death penalty) against the worst offenders.
Everything has degrees of severity, usually based on amount of harm.
Its such a difficult topic to discuss, in the context of law - which demands nuance.
How about this.
First degree - those who create CSAM.
+ Aggravated - penetration of childs body
++ Aggravated - *specifics redacted*
+++ Aggravated - Death of child
Threshold / Punishment.
First degree + Aggravated - Castration + incarceration.
First degree ++ Aggravated - Death Penalty.
First degree - Commission it - pay other usually poor people to make it.
+ Aggravated - provide a script.
++ Aggravated - share it to others
+++ Aggravated - sell it for profit;
Threshold / Punishment
First degree ++ - Death Penalty.
etc.
Second degree - purchase it but have no part in the making of it.
- Aggravated - share it with others
+ Aggravated - sell it for profit
Where do you think, the threshold should be.
Try holding some polls. It will legitimize the premise.
What do you reckon @RupertLowe10
Our true Tahonga is Kiwi - an identity forged in the furnaces of WW1, where both people came together in a bond. Our sporting teams help carry this forward - but Kiwi - is hardly recognized let alone celebrated any more.
Kiwis recognized each others differences, and respected them. They went and shared them - and valued them for their distinction and difference. The Hongis, the Hangis; The Billy T James.
The thing that made Kiwis Kiwis is a love of the land.
Some groups growing in number, don't feel a part of society. This is a stepping stone for them. They have other plans.
They latch on to our naive and "woke-blinded" social welfare net - intended to support Kiwis in need - and start to suckle. In between fly tipping.
That's just my observation.
@TruthFairy131@MadDustmite777 No doubt, its an active attempt Bolshevik coup underway; but they haven't won yet by any stretch of imagination.
There is pushback from all corners. Even within politics.
A digital democracy would be a good outcome.
That's true, but a lot of people saw it reported as such.
Probably initially for mischief.
But its good for people to cognize, that every group has their violent problem children.
Some stay at home, some get sent overseas. And seek asylum. Yes, we're all human; but its human to want to protect ones society; the weak and the innocent.
Some societies, "cultures" could be best summarized by the characteristic: "prey on the weak".
That's not how it is in the West. We should recognize this, and recognize the threats to its existence.
Woke has bound our ability to identify and recognize group threats. Every police report should include core characteristics of the individual; if its a problem, then the solution is to turn off that tap. NOT suppress the outrage.
This alone would have stopped the Pakistani Rape Gangs - and their complicit police collaborators *cold rage* - long ago.
@Dave89579103@RCR_NZ It will probably have to be citizen initiated.
Once it gets the numbers, and trusted/mature system, it will become the most legitimate voice.
Many such real life examples demonstrate that this is not being practiced.
"Vetting" - while necessary is not any practical demonstration of societal responsibility.
We should review all such cases and deeply investigate judges who have performed such casual leniency towards police officers implicated in such crimes.
This is a basic requirement to remove the rot.
@grok@FreyjaBakke Surely senior police officers should have a higher bar requirement to integrity; and breaches of law in such cases should be considered "aggravated" - requiring the severest penalties.
Without this, predators will flock to authority positions to benefit from impunity.
Discuss.
And the swarming bureaucracy blocks peoole from creating their own solutions.
Government has done what it usually does; create a ruling class whobsee themselves as rulers over public freedoms;
We need a digital democracy.
We have the means to make this work now - this is the benevolent path for Ai.