@ZeptoNow My sister is looking for a referral code to share with me so that both of us can benefit from using Zepto. I have just installed the app. This screen is on my phone. However we couldn’t find the Referral code on her app. It is updated. Please assist.
رجل الماني من ميونخ كان لديه فضول اين تذهب الملابس في صندوق تبرعات الصليب الاحمر فوضع جهاز تتبع AirTag في حذاء
ال��فاجأة بعد 5 ايام تتبع الحذاء ليجده سافر اكثر من 800 كم، مر ب��لنمسا وسلوفينيا وكرواتيا واخيرا وصل للبوسنه والهرسك، سافر لهناك ووجده في متجر احذيه معروض للبيع واشتراه ب10 يورو ونشر هذا المقطع
سبب الموضوع جدل كبير فأضطر الصليب الاحمر يرد: بأن 10% من الملابس تذهب مجانا للمحتاجين والباقي يتم بيعها لتمويل مشاريع انسانية
MISSING GIRLS IN TORONTO
Sophia, 14, was last seen March 16, 2026.
Sharhea, 15, was last seen March 27, 2026
Shaelynn, 14, was last seen March 31, 2026.
There is a crisis of Black children going missing, being taken, and trafficked out province @TorontoPolice@FOMissingBoys
@RailMadad I am trying to raise a grievance on the website for refund not received for unreserved ticket not generated through a Smart Machine, but money was deducted. I have Reference number. How to find UTS number? The form doesn't move ahead without this number. Thanks!
@drmbct@RailwaySeva@IRCTCofficial The ticket was closed with no resolution. What kind of customer service is this? Please refund my fare that was deducted as the tickets were not generated. I have even shared the Reference number.
288 nurses cut.
40 vice-principals cut at the Toronto District School Board.
Public services stretched to the breaking point.
But somehow there’s room for this?
Since 2022, Kara Ford has seen her salary increase by over $83,000 a year.
While the rest of Ontario is being cut and starved?
Doug Ford, Ontario deserves better than this.
@RailwaySeva@drmbct I rcvd msg- "Your RailMadad Reference No. 20260403***** has been closed. Please check closing remarks and give your valuable feedback"
In the remarks they asked for an image (no way to upload) and transaction ID: I entered in remarks. But why close the ticket BEFORE resolution?
@blinkitcares I have filed a complaint with NCH because of unsatisfactory resolution of my concern. Firstly, you denied refund of handling fee, and then claim that the original product amount was refunded, also which I have not received. For Rs. 104, if you act up like this, shame on you!
@letsblinkit if the main product of my order is wrongly picked, and I return it, why should I bear the handling fee? Rs. 5 should be refunded as well, or atleast a pro-rata percentage of it.
@blinkitcares If I do not receive a response from your team within the next 24 hours, I will be forced to file a complaint with the National Consumer Helpline. I am fed up of repeatedly reaching out.
@Lexie93970355@KanwarSierah@liberal_party Definitely, better than being sponsored. However, why allow them to stay further when they've been deemed ineligible after thorough checks? They continue to leech on job opportunities and already scanty housing resources. I believe that the Removal orders must be executed.
India ran the most important cardiovascular study of the 20th century by accident, and then immediately forgot about it.
In 1967, Dr. S.L. Malhotra published a study in the British Heart Journal examining heart disease rates among 1.5 million Indian railway employees. The population was extraordinarily useful for research purposes: same employer, same healthcare access, comparable income and working conditions, spread across the entire country.
The only meaningful variable was geography. Which meant diet.
North Indian railway workers: Punjab, Rajasthan, UP, ate a diet built around ghee and dairy fat. They consumed up to 19 times more fat than their southern counterparts. The fat was primarily saturated: clarified butter, milk fat, the short-chain saturated fatty acids that Ancel Keys had recently been telling the Western world were arterial death.
South Indian railway workers ate a diet based on rice, sambar, and seed oils: groundnut oil and sesame oil, primarily. They ate considerably less fat overall. By the standards of dietary advice being formulated in the 1960s, they should have been the healthy ones.
Heart disease mortality in South India: 135 per 100,000.
Heart disease mortality in North India: 20 per 100,000.
Seven times higher in the population eating seed oils.
Among railway sweepers specifically, the lowest-paid, most physically active workers, the gap was even wider. Heart disease was fifteen times more common in the South Indian sweeper population than in the North Indian sweeper population.
Malhotra controlled for everything he could reach: smoking, where Northerners actually smoked more. Activity levels, where the relationship was inconsistent. Socioeconomic status, where executives died more often than sweepers regardless of region. He found no variable that explained the gap except the type of fat in the diet.
He published the data. In a peer-reviewed journal. In 1967.
The study was cited periodically, acknowledged as methodologically interesting, and then set aside.
The decade in which Malhotra published was the decade in which Ancel Keys's fat hypothesis was being converted into policy. The American Heart Association was issuing guidance recommending polyunsaturated vegetable oils as replacements for saturated animal fats. The food industry was producing seed oils at industrial scale. The infrastructure of seed oil promotion was being built, expensively and with great institutional momentum.
A study showing that populations eating animal fat had a fraction of the heart disease of populations eating seed oils was not, in that context, a study that anyone particularly wanted to follow up.
Nobody followed up.
Almost sixty years later, the finding stands unrefuted in the literature.
It is not in the dietary guidelines.
@blinkitcares Is this company paying someone to copy paste the same response repeatedly? And you call that "addressed your concern"? My concern has not been addressed. Please escalate this matter to someone with some rationality and discretion. Frustrating experience since the beginning. UGHH!
@blinkitcares It is appalling that the handling fees refund is denied despite a wrong product sent, but bold of the platform to make me pay the fee to order the same item again, which was previously picked wrongly. (Also there's no surety that it would be picked correctly this time!!)
Also, there’s no option to replace the product. Gotta place a new order and pay the Handling fee again. This is unfair, and highly unethical on your part.