@DianaPickard4@GeorgePapa19 and why?
Either one does the trick, I'm finding it difficult to believe someone would do both at the same time just incase one failed.
@dave_saul1@Louise1_stewart @RedDevil0312 @Keir_Starmer@simonlightwood Johnson didn't win them. Labour just wouldn't listen to their concerns over remaining in the EU and what FoM does to people in the lower wage brackets and so lost them.
The fight for the next election will be where it usually is, the swing seats.
@Louise1_stewart @RedDevil0312 @Keir_Starmer@simonlightwood Up until 2019, Wakefield had been a Labour seat since 1932. It's a red wall seat. It's tragic if you think winning back strongholds is an achievement. π€·ββοΈ
I just limited todays criticism to the content of his short tweet he didn't bother to proof read.
@Debwid22@TonyM70@Keir_Starmer@simonlightwood It looks like you're angling for a promotion. π€£
The fact is, at no point during the months from the initial story to when evidence was presented proving Rayners presence, no-one attempted to correct the record.
That isn't a small mistake, that's a strategy.
@Debwid22@TonyM70@Keir_Starmer@simonlightwood The timeline shows clearly that a lunch of over an hour was pre-arranged at the end of the evening. That isn't "grabbing a bite as we worked".
The story made it to the newspapers, yet no-one acknowledged Rayners presence. If no rules were broken then why lie?
@Debwid22@TonyM70@Keir_Starmer@simonlightwood That's a schoolkid level excuse.
Rayner, Starmer or any of the others could have corrected it at anytime between the months before the admission - that only came after categoric proof was presented.
@ArchRose90 Speaks volumes that he's looking for the dumbest questions to ask during his interview. π€
Whether you support or hate the strike action, it'd be nice if Journalists made an attempt at doing their job seriously. He just looks like he specifically wants to misrepresent the situ