@wolftivy@curtis_yarvin If one stops being a cuck, many ways to cut that pie, do they then avoid the conflicts ailing the West which are the literal punishments being described? I agree w/Yarvin's point. But your claim was: Yarvin denigrating bc just world syndrome is used incorrectly... but it isn't.
@wolftivy@curtis_yarvin So, Yarvin isn't denigrating, he's accurately describing just world syndrome. But, if what you say is true, the religious belief that God is punishing us for being cucks, then there's nothing anyone can do to prevent divine punishment as destiny. So why comment?
@wolftivy@curtis_yarvin Your claim: Yarvin's explanation of normiecon usage of just world syndrome is an unfair critique. In contrast, normiecons believe "God will punish our enemies", not "God is punishing us for being cucks" Evangelicals don't believe latter bc they believe third worldism is just.
"They were fighting because they refused to recognize any authority that was legitimate, we because we would not recognize any that was not legitimate... because it was based on a recognition of values which were dictated by the needs of man & not by the eternal higher power..."
@curtis_yarvin Moreover, popular movements (regardless of left or right) have no chance because they will get physically steamrolled in the streets by the police/military. In contrast, when Antifa/BLM riot & the police stand down, that is a victory march for regime approved paramilitaries.
@curtis_yarvin This is true to the extent that a given gov has a functional police and military. Instead, if the police/military are affected by sectarian/secessionist personnel, that has at min. potential to be a chink in the enforcement armor of omnipotent 21st c. surveillance gov.
@Theo_Chilton Look, I wish Republicans weren't such boomercon cucks. But all of this "needs to happen" stuff is cope-posting. If there's a military coup that would be the greatest miracle this country has ever seen, but I'm not holding my breath.
@Theo_Chilton Well, yes considering Republicans are the only option we have. Or are you saying Republicans are going to authorize some sort of clandestine military operation to take out the Dems?
"It's inevitable, get ready for the Trumpencaust". The e-right has faith in some magical force where they don't have to do anything & boomercons will magically become fascists bc Trump's team puts out decent PR. The GOP hype accounts are so tiresome.
Holy fucking cope... the amount of e-right Americans claiming they're going to violently overthrow the state, from their keyboards of course, is hysterical. Without financial support & nationwide irl organization from oligarchs, you're going to get one-shotted.
Sadly, he's not wrong: 1. only Trump provides victories but they're incremental & subject to reversal if GOP loses one more election; 2. poasting isn't power & there's no meaningful irl organization, 3; West still run by boomers (incl. Xers), so need generational turnover ASAP.
Or, we start an entirely new political party, focusing primarily on engaging young men from online to irl, based on what worked in previous comparable eras & applied to the new online era. Although, this may be even more difficult. Starting point:
https://t.co/kpQu31EpRn
So in 1920s Europe spending money on politics meant: you buy a party newspaper. Which tells your supporters why, how, when and where to vote. In 1980s America you buy ads on NBC, CBS and ABC. Etc.
Now you install the party app. Which tells users why, how, when and where to vote
Sadly, he's not wrong: 1. only Trump provides victories but they're incremental & subject to reversal if GOP loses one more election; 2. poasting isn't power & there's no meaningful irl organization, 3; West still run by boomers (incl. Xers), so need generational turnover ASAP.
@ThomBrady5 Making impossible demands your leaders will never enact is only setting yourself up for another 20 years of being constantly angry and confused
"But it's happened before (cites Op. Wetback)", not enough & done by same Pres. who enforced desegregation at gunpoint. Must run correct candidates, requires transforming GOP w/generational turnover (premature bc can't wait until lose one more election):
https://t.co/Btq8htfJK3
GOP doesn't have the correct candidates bc they're not vying for power (complete overhaul of regime & structure), but instead an attempt to reform the system to a perceived historical (but never real) "bipartisan normality" (normality pertaining to one's childhood naivety).
GOP doesn't have the correct candidates bc they're not vying for power (complete overhaul of regime & structure), but instead an attempt to reform the system to a perceived historical (but never real) "bipartisan normality" (normality pertaining to one's childhood naivety).
None of this can work for the right. Not even with the Trump State Department in your corner.
What needs to be done: win an election, then take actual power. Make sure you a deserve it and know what to do with it
@contramordor Yarvin has discussed Burnham's books to a great extent, specifically "The Machiavellians". He's not saying, "the buck stops with Congress". Albeit, it could've been worded more clearly, but the Cathedral using Congress is the implication bc Yarvin assumes readers have a basis.
The block & mute features are the best part of this deteriorating app. Simply unusable unless I remove the low IQ and disingenuous from my feed. "Read a (old) book" remains the most apt insult of all time... or they can keep getting algo-raped by engagement accounts.