I have asked myself this same question a million times.
Scottsdale was 5.5 hours from Tyler’s house; UVU was 4.
Also, why JUST Charlie? Tyler’s a homicidal maniac but he’s also principled about harming “innocent bystanders”? Doubt.
I truly don’t believe Tyler was supposed to make it this far.
I think he found out he was being framed, told his parents he was scared, and they turned him in .. quite possibly saving his life.
The alleged text said: “I want to go out on my own terms. I have no intention of being drug through the courts in front of the country.”
That does not sound like someone expecting to calmly make it to trial. That sounds like someone expecting — or being pushed toward - a police shootout.
Crooks didn’t make it out alive.
Oswald was arrested, but didn’t make it to trial.
And I think that single change in plans foiled the whole operation.
That, and if the mic theory is true, they’ve been scrambling since day one.
THE “KIRK FAMILY STATEMENT” was a Kolvet PR stunt. The judge wasn’t going to unredact anything in violation of Tyler 14A rights..
The Kirk Family stunt gives the illusion that what’s been redacted is Tyler’s fake ass confession they lied to ppl about. But Tyler never confessed.
Tyler Robinson is innocent .
The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; in this video, we can see how they get rid of the evidence of the crime.
None of them covered for another shot or looked for the shooter because they blew Charlie up with a bomb in his mic. see video ⏭️
The moment I started exposing pedophilia in Alberta is the moment ALL Alberta politicians,
especially Premier Danielle Smith, tried to have me eliminated…
Alberta is the child sex trafficking hub of North America and the pedophiles have been attacking me non-stop for past 2 years.
Many Canadian conservative politicians are involved in pedophilia and sex crimes against children.
If Iran takes out more LNG trains in Qatar, they could set the world back TEN YEARS in terms of energy. With guaranteed global famine and economic collapse. And there's literally nothing the Pentagon can do to stop it.
A few people asked me for the actual documentation showing biometric data is collected when you open a Trump Account for your kid. Sharing here so you can see it for yourself, because the paperwork is more damning than any summary of it.
1. Robinhood’s own privacy statement admits it, in writing. The Trump Accounts Privacy Statement on https://t.co/BqyVZ1yl1Z says, verbatim:
“Biometric Data: We extract facial geometry data from selfies/photographs/videos to verify your identity and detect/prevent fraud.”
That sentence sits inside a section describing information collected about “the Responsible Party and the Account Beneficiary.” The Responsible Party is the parent.
The Account Beneficiary, for the record, is the kid.
2. Treasury’s own privacy assessment confirms selfie collection- and then DENIES using AI in the same document.
The Trump Accounts Privacy and Civil Liberties Impact Assessment, signed by Treasury on May 18, 2026, contains two checkboxes that cannot both be true.
Section 4, titled “Biometrics / Distinguishing Features / Characteristics of Individuals,” has this box checked:
☒ “Photos/Video: Selfie images collected for identity verification through third-party identity verification services”
And section 2, “Artificial Intelligence,” has this box checked on page 3:
☒ “None of the above. This information system does not utilize AI.”
Same document. Same signature. Selfie biometric collection acknowledged in Section 4. AI usage denied in Section 2.
3. And to top it all off, facial-geometry extraction (measuring the distances between features on a face to produce a mathematical identifier) is definitionally an AI/ML process under the statutory definition of AI that Treasury itself cites in the same document, 15 U.S.C. § 9401(3):
“a machine-based system that can, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations, or decisions.”
That is exactly what a face-geometry algorithm does when it decides whether the selfie matches the ID. So either Robinhood’s privacy statement is wrong about what its vendors do, or Treasury’s checkbox is wrong about whether AI is being used. One of these documents is not telling the truth. Both of them were signed by people whose job is to tell it.
I know that’s a lot to hold in your head at once, but that’s the point. The confusion isn’t a side effect of how this demonstrous thing was built.