Casper Labuschagne

Activist, Christian nationalist. Anti transhumanism & mandated vaccination. Critical of Zionist Israel becoming a lunatic state dragging humanity into war.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@JacoKleynhans The ingrained impulse to view anyone that does not look like, sound like, smell like, dress like or behave like mom & dad as a grave threat to self, home or village is at the root of the behaviour misslabelled as racism. Why racial groups generally segregate into distinct areas.

[Andrew Bridgen @ABridgen]

These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.

Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.

Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”

Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”

Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”

Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”

Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”

Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”

Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”

Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”

Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”

Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”

Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”

Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”

Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”

Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”

Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”

[Daily Investor @DailyInvestorSA]

South Africa risks becoming irrelevant in a world where powerful nations act unilaterally to pursue their interests, as its weakened economy, eroded industrial capacity, and diminished soft power leave it unable to meaningfully influence global events.
https://t.co/TQMbdt6E6b

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@Wisdom_HQ It was a blessing to be banned in 2021 since the COVID vaccine was deemed “safe and effective. “ I have not considered going back to check if my ban has been lifted, not even once. In real life I connect to people that matter instead of scrollling on a phone.

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

Green Energy is not meant to ‘work’

It's meant to break our economies, to induce scarcity and rationing.

To necessitate UBI via CBDC and Digital ID.

Which will become a social credit system.

Benefiting UN, WEF and CCP.

[Will Tanner @Will_Tanner_1]

Rory is right, Rhodesia is everywhere. Why?

Rhodesia's story strikes home because it is the perfect political litmus test:

Is it human flourishing the functioning of the state that matters, or commitment to a vague idea of egalitarianism and equity, whatever the consequences?

Rhodesia was, by its very nature, unequal and hierarchical. That was true from the beginning: Cecil Rhodes only let the best men into his Pioneer Column, looking particularly not for rogues but for gentleman adventurers and the well-educated, as he thought they would be the best basis of a functional settlement. This remained true of Rhodesian immigration policy through the 50s, with the state searching for and drawing in the best men of every class as they fled the tax-destroyed, egalitarian hell of postwar Britain

As a result, Rhodesia functioned well. Quite well, in fact. It had the highest living standards for blacks on the continent, was immensely prosperous, maintained classic British social culture well after taxes and war destroyed that in Britain, and was generally a society that did not just allow for but encouraged human flourishing. It was the breadbasket of Southern Africa, beautiful, and growing quickly. Such were the natural wages of inequality

Zimbabwe was the opposite of Rhodesia in every respect. Instead of prizing excellence, it prized equality. It put equity first, destroyed the hierarchy that had existed in Rhodesia, and replaced it with the cutting of all tall poppies by the Mugabe regime

As a result, it was characterized by disorder and lawlessness rather than smooth functioning, kleptocracy rather than just and paternalistic rule, famine rather than being a breadbasket, and total destruction and decay rather than human flourishing. Such were the natural wages of equality

That is a story that resonates with all of us. For decades now, in fact over a century, since the end of the Great War, every state in the West has bowed before egalitarianism

First, in the mid-20th century, this meant sky-high death and income taxes meant to strip wealth from the competent and productive and hand it to the incompetent and unproductive

Then it meant racialized policy meant to force equality upon all of us. In America, that has consisted of DEI, reparations, disparate impact laws, soft on crime policing, and all the rest of the Civil Rights regime. To make outcomes equal, the only way that the equality of man could be reflected, whites have been kept out of jobs, positions, academia, and more, replaced by those who would not be in the positions in which they are in a world that put merit first, but get to rule and profit because of Zimbabwe-style equity

The result is that we live in the increasingly tattered and tyrannical world built by that ideology. We have put equity first, as did Rhodesia, and the result is not triumph built atop the equality of man but rather inexorable decline that here as there has turned paradise into hell

Rhodesia is relevant, and so is increasingly popping up everywhere, not just because it shows where equality leads, but because it shows the alternative: the only way to avoid Global Zimbabwe and the Eternal Favela is to choose the other side of the litmus test. To embrace flourishing through choosing hierarchy, paternalism, and stewardship while rejecting egalitarianism, equity, and mass democracy

That is difficult for many to accept, but it is true, and is the lesson of Rhodesia. No compromise can be made with the race communist poison. It must be rejected root and branch, in all its forms. Flourishing must be put first, and equality ignored, or we will all be equally miserable

[Ernst Roets @ErnstRoets]

If they scrap BEE in South Africa, the economy will grow and unemployment will shrink. If they keep it, it will be the other way around. It's that simple.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@WietsJBuys @Thewatchingtick @uMarhobane I presume that everyone that ventured beyond the borders of the colony identified as “trekboere.” There was also a spirit of independence with small and short-lived republics being founded. While boer was a colloquial term, when did it become a political identity?

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@Thewatchingtick @uMarhobane @WietsJBuys The term “Boer” as used by British subjects in the Cape, Natal and Rhodesian colonies as well as by the “uitlanders” on the gold mines was a derogatory term used with all the loaded venom that could be mustered. As is the term “Boer” used by black nationalists up to today.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@WietsJBuys @Thewatchingtick @uMarhobane There were “trekboere” though “Boer” was not a political identity either after the British annexation of the Cape, at Slagternek, with the numerous Xhosa wars or with the Voortrekkers. The term “Boer” was very much a loaded and derogatory term used by British colonists.

[Dirk Hermann @SolidariDirk]

Solidarity is taking legal action in court against the South African government, which has breached an agreement on race laws facilitated by the United Nations. The government has also ignored a court order. The South African government are the perpetrators and are in no moral position to consider action against Solidarity. Solidarity will intensify its actions against the government’s racial obsession. The difference is that we do not issue threats, but make use of the courts and lawful international processes because the government is acting unlawfully.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@NoahsArk1000 MIGA not MAGA.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@akafaceUS Walk right out with speed and determination in every step.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@uMarhobane @WietsJBuys @Thewatchingtick In this Free State town, I could walk down the road and encounter fifty Afrikaners before I will come across that one bearded individual “behang met wapens” that calls himself a “Boer” in hyper-articulated Afrikaans. FYI, Carel Boshoff referred to Orania as an Afrikanerstad.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@uMarhobane @WietsJBuys @Thewatchingtick Dream? I grew up with the identity of an Afrikaner where boer was reserved for farming enterprises. The first time I ever become aware of any so-called “boer identity” post the Anglo-boer war was in the early 1980’s with Jani Allen’s amplification of Eugene Terreblanche.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@NoahsArk1000 MIGA not MAGA

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

Whether one agrees with Nick Fuentes or not, he has a knack for telling things like it is.

[Fractured Light @FracturedLight0]

Nick Fuentes talks about Donald Trump being Benjamin Netanyahu’s b*tch.

It’s been widely reported that Bibi brings his dirty laundry to the White House to be cleaned whenever he visits…let that sink in.

“We should get Trump a vest, so he can look like a waiter.”

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

@WhiteLionII1 Die kewer wat my Pa gehad het was nog in Wolfburg in Duitsland gemaak met ‘n embleem daarop en het ‘n hele R900 gekos. Die kewer was in die familie tot in die laat tagtigs toe my suster daarmee kollege toe gery het.

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

With the SACP vowing to march to the US Embassy for the US to never have peace in South Africa, March comes early this year. The normal South African commie-comrade calendar is January, February, March, March, March, March, March, March...

[Casper Labuschagne @CasperLabuscha1]

So says the communist ideologue of the government alliance partner. Yet South Africa has only two operational advanced jet fighters with a single pilot qualified to fly those jets. Next time do a back-of-the-napkin calculation on strategic strength before challenging the USA.

[SABC News @SABCNews]

WATCH | SACP General Secretary Solly Mapaila says the party is organising a march to the US Embassy on Thursday. He adds: "The US should never know peace in our country when they destabilise other countries."