I never thought I’d see the day where I contemplated voting for a Democrat over ANY republican, but when Republicans run like Libertarians and legislate like Liberals I’d rather vote for the devil that’s NOT in disguise—Or not vote at all.
🚨 DR. WILLIAM MAKIS SAYS THIS IS THE MOST IMPORTANT IVERMECTIN DOSING GRAPH HE'S CREATED.
Not a new chemotherapy drug.
Not a breakthrough immunotherapy.
Not a billion-dollar cancer treatment.
Just one simple dosing strategy.
According to Dr. William Makis, this is the dosing framework he believes everyone researching repurposed medicines for cancer should understand first.
And it all starts with one number.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Before explaining why, here's the dosing framework Dr. Makis discusses.
📊 The Four Ivermectin Dosing Ranges
🟢 Low Dose: ≤0.5 mg/kg/day
Used for cancers in remission, strong family history, genetic predisposition, prophylaxis, and lower-dose protocols discussed in published case reports.
🟡 Medium Dose: 1.0 mg/kg/day
Dr. Makis' recommended starting dose for most cancers.
🔵 High Dose: 2.0 mg/kg/day
Discussed for very aggressive cancers, including leukaemia, pancreatic cancer, and some brain cancers.
🔴 Very High Dose: ≥2.5 mg/kg/day
Discussed in selected reported cases involving extensive metastatic disease or extremely poor prognosis, where temporary visual side effects have also been reported.
Now here's why Dr. Makis believes 1 mg/kg/day deserves the most attention.
After reviewing laboratory research, published studies, and numerous case reports, he says this is the starting dose he recommends for most cancers.
According to Dr. Makis, research has investigated Ivermectin across a surprisingly wide range of cancers, including:
• Breast cancer
• Colon cancer
• Lung cancer
• Pancreatic cancer
• Kidney (renal cell) cancer
• Gastric cancer
• Leukemia
One exception stood out.
Lymphoma.
Dr. Makis says he has found very little published research involving Ivermectin and lymphoma.
That doesn't mean it doesn't work.
It simply means the evidence is currently limited.
❓What does 1 mg/kg/day actually look like?
For someone weighing 60 kg (132 lbs)...
That's approximately 60 mg of Ivermectin every day.
Equivalent to:
💊 Five 12 mg tablets
OR
💧 About 6 mL of liquid Ivermectin, roughly one teaspoon.
According to Dr. Makis, that's where he recommends starting for many cancers.
Can lower doses still have an effect?
✅ He believes they can.
Dr. Makis discusses a published ovarian cancer case reported by Dr. Tess Lawrie.
The dosing chart lists the patient as receiving 12 mg of Ivermectin per day. During his discussion, Dr. Makis explains that this was approximately 0.2 mg/kg/day, placing it within the chart's Low Dose (≤0.5 mg/kg/day) range.
📉 According to the case report, the patient's CA125 tumor marker reportedly fell from 288 to 22 after two months.
That case is one reason Dr. Makis believes Ivermectin may have anticancer activity even at lower doses.
However...
He also believes the available evidence suggests the effect is dose dependent.
In other words...
Higher doses may produce greater effects, although more clinical research is needed.
What about the most aggressive cancers?
• Pancreatic cancer
• Leukemia
• Brain cancer
For cancers like these, Dr. Makis discusses doses around 2 mg/kg/day in selected situations.
He notes that Ivermectin crosses the blood-brain barrier, although not very efficiently, which is one reason he says higher doses may be considered for some brain cancers.
He also discusses a case reported by Dr. Allan Landrito.
According to Dr. Makis, a physician with terminal gallbladder cancer reportedly took 2 mg/kg/day for 14 months.
He says her cancer eventually disappeared.
She experienced temporary visual side effects that resolved after a few days.
❓How high have reported doses gone?
According to Dr. Makis, he has seen reported doses as high as 2.5 mg/kg/day.
He references patients treated by Dr. Shankara Chetty who reportedly used those doses without long-term side effects, although some experienced temporary visual disturbances that later resolved.
One point Dr. Makis returns to repeatedly...
Long-term use.
He references the Castro study involving children with leukemia who reportedly received Ivermectin for six months without long-term side effects.
He also discusses anecdotal reports of adults taking it daily for more than a year without long-term toxicity.
So why aren't there larger cancer trials?
Dr. Makis believes one of the biggest obstacles is economics.
Because Ivermectin is an off-patent generic medicine, he argues there is little financial incentive to fund large clinical trials.
Whether future research ultimately confirms or challenges these ideas remains to be seen.
But Dr. Makis' message is remarkably simple.
One graph.
One dosing strategy.
One starting point.
📌 1 mg/kg/day.
Because the conversation isn't just about Ivermectin anymore.
It's about whether repurposed drugs deserve the same level of scientific investigation as newer therapies.
🗨️ Do you think inexpensive repurposed medicines like Ivermectin deserve larger, well-designed clinical trials for cancer?
🔖 Save this post so you'll always have Dr. Makis' dosing framework handy, and repost it to help others discover the ongoing research into repurposed medicines.
💊 Looking for pharmaceutical grade Ivermectin, Fenbendazole, or Mebendazole? Choose @rxmeds_store. Trusted by thousands of customers worldwide.
#Ivermectin #CancerResearch #RepurposedDrugs #Oncology #CancerCare #MedicalResearch #PancreaticCancer #MakisMD #RxMeds
Per my local police department, Flock charges approximately $3000/year per camera.
So American taxpayers are spending $349,671,000 per year to be constantly monitored. Most Americans are unaware this is happening.
@therealDeFlock
TERRYL FARNSWORTH OF TPUSA NEEDS TO BE HAULED IN FOR QUESTIONING LIKE YESTERDAY! ‼‼️
Once you understand the logistics of Terryl’s behavior in the final minutes of Charlies life and just after he was killed, you understand that HE HAD TO KNOW WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN.
Terryl positioned himself in a place that required climbing to get a good vantage point. He did this BEFORE Charlie was killed. He then recorded a video from his vantage point which began recording BEFORE anyone else had made it outside yet.
After Charlie is shot, people start to panic and run for their lives like in any tragedy. Charlies' security detail does their scramble to hide evidence and tie up loose ends before they manage to carry Charlie out like a sack of potatoes with no neck support or no real concern for his well-being. TERRYL IS IN PLACE BEFORE ANYONE MAKES IT TO THE EXIT.
Terryl then records a VERY STRANGE video where he obviously feigns emotion about what just happened but focuses the camera on himself instead of the scene. He delivers his obvious scripted lines and says "they killed charlie" before saying "god help him"
@DiligentDenizen has done unbelievable work on this case bringing light to what was kept in the dark. I strongly recommend you follow him and look at ALL of his amazing work. He lays out the logistics of the vantage point after he visited UVU in the video below.
THERE IS NO WAY TO EXPLAIN HOW TERRYL KNEW TO GET INTO THAT SPOT BEFORE CHARLIE WAS HIT WITHOUT KNOWING ABOUT THE GREATER PLOT. IF TERRYL KNEW, THEN YOU KNOW THE ENTIRE SECURITY TEAM KNEW. THAT IS WHAT WE CALL A CONSPIRACY.
Read what he is saying. He is telling the truth.
They do not have operable cameras so the owner cannot definitively state that Tyler was at his restaurant on September 10th. I can tell you, there were 3 servers on that night. The server that actually served Tyler Robinson was certain it was him and reported it to management when Tyler’s face was blasted across the news. The owner then checked by pulling the receipt and discovered that— at the very least— someone with the name of Tyler Robinson had paid with his credit/debit card. They then reported it to the Feds.
The Feds hardly cared. The receipt that has been posted is real.
All of this is factual and will come out in due time. There is no way around it.
I can’t be the only one looking forward to Turning Point USA execs and resident goofus @blakeneff’s response to this.
Think they’ll call a Seal Team 6 sniper a lying sociopath? Get their influencers to smear a Brigadier General? Ask Brian Harpole to sue them or run their usual Pastor bit and call these men “demonic”?
What’s your move here, @AndrewKolvet? Got another report on “Digital Assassin culture” cooking?
Many people don't know this but Tyler and Lance had a 3rd roommate in 2024 and the first half of 2025. That roommate is the source of the Turkey Tom texts. If you go back and read those messages with that understanding you can easily derive that from the context.
That roommate is also the SOLE source of the "Lance is trans" talking point. But because the roommate has been repeatedly quoted as an "unnamed friend"- and not a literal freaking roommate- it created the effect of many people saying it.
When I first figured out the TT texts were written by someone who actually lived with Lance and Tyler I couldn't understand why he hadn't simply identified himself as their former roommate? It would have instantly given him more credibility.
And by saying he was their friend it made all those pictures he had taken of Lance's nests look weird AF and made everyone think the messages were written by the feds. Because like... who stalks around their friend's house taking pictures like that?
Well going through the transcripts today, I finally figured it out. It's because nearly all of the actual evidence against Tyler had been collected from the roommates room, NOT Tyler's. Specifically the Remington boxes and the other engraved bullets.
I'm now more convinced than ever that whoever this roommate is, is the one who set Tyler up. I think he's some kind of handler probably. And I also think Lance is the one who he was supposed to set up and for some reason Tyler went in his place.
That's why he took ALLL those pictures, meticulously documenting Lance's mental illness. That's why 3/4ths of his messages with Turkey Tom were detailing Lance's "mental illnesses" and barely mentioning Tyler whatsoever.
But for reasons I still haven't figured out, Tyler went to Orem instead of Lance that day.
I think those iMessages were written using Tyler's Apple account logged into his MacBook, and that's why the Apple records weren't presented in court. I tested this out one day by having my phone locked and simply messaging my girlfriend from my desktop. I was able to send and receive messages with her and then delete them on my Mac and my phone never once pinged and I had no record of them on my phone.
I think there are a lot of communications between that roommate and Lance and Tyler. And that's why they kept search warrant for all data collections limited to simply the dates between August 27th and September 12th. Police routinely subpoena a years worth of comms for a suspect accused of petty crimes. But they are only interested in 15 days worth of communications in the most high profile murder of the last 60 years? Total BS.
I've picked up on MANY issues with the official story going through these transcripts but I had to get this one off my chest because it has been bugging me for months.
The widow of Corey Comperatore says she has reason to believe that the assassination attempt in Butler, which took the life of her husband, was an inside job.
Helen Comperatore is pleading with Trump to do something and says she won't have closure until the people responsible are thrown in prison.
Comperatore says she believes Thomas Crooks had help from someone inside the government.
"He didn’t just get up that day and go do it," she said.
"I've been told things... but I've had something that happened with me that afterwards, and you're starting to put the pieces together, it just made total sense."
You think posting a 20-year-old mugshot of me is some kind of flex?
We know what you did. We know how you betrayed Charlie.
You’re cooked, bro. Can’t wait to see your mugshot. Unlike me, you’ll actually be going away for a long time to a real prison.
Tyrone is waiting for you.
@AndrewKolvet@realstewpeters When you respond like this, just so you know… EVERYONE can see right through you.
This is how people who have something to hide, act.
Tick tock, Andrew.