Cameron

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@Dirty_BBB @asdfgwerthdcb @Bruhmoment41876 I’ve lived in Utah for 20+ years. I have no idea what these “no go” zones are.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@D_Boyer69 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@WilliamJen46953 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@CyrusWJones @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@JSgian1 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@caro66490 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@lynne_catmom @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@MiddleGradeELA @ByuSome He doesn’t. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@louisMathew19 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@ThomBradley8 @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@raticspecialist @ByuSome That’s literally the joke. Some evangelicals will argue that the BoM can’t be scripture because it “adds” to the Bible, which violates this verse, even though the verse in question is about the Book of Revelation, not the Bible as a whole. He’s making fun of that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@Jonatha48026312 @ByuSome That’s the joke. Certain evangelicals will often use this verse to argue that the Book of Mormon can’t be scripture, because it’s “adding” to the Bible, even though the verse, as you pointed out, only condemns adding to the Book of Revelation. Some BYU Dude is mocking that logic.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@RFerg_ii @BarstoolAlabama That’s an almost perfect picture. The elephant looks too big though, like it could theoretically do some damage. You should change this to be a baby elephant instead.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@MetsFanInTexas @_loyalson_ @sircoqdecombat @BarstoolBig12 So what you’re telling me is that, for Houston at least…it just meant more?

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@Haywire1120 @kslnewsradio At least they didn’t produce Ted Bundy

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@NotreDave @Chad_CougarTown @_SVPod Ohio State, Indiana, Georgia, Texas Tech, and Texas A&M would be the five I consider elite. Even elite teams can lose to good teams, i.e Texas A&M losing to Texas, or Georgia losing to Alabama, especially when they’re on the road and without their starting quarterback.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@NotreDave @Chad_CougarTown @_SVPod Notre Dame never played elite competition…
Elite=Good enough to win a national championship. Neither Miami or Texas A&M are at that level. Texas Tech is.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@Nolemusk168187 @DJJazzyJody Serious question. How long have you been following college football? Because even a casual fan is aware of a consistently ranked Utah team that has been sending first round offensive/defensive linemen to the NFL for close to a decade now. I’m not even an Utah fan btw.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@Bravo_0ne @Archerygod1971 @CFBONFOX To be fair, Alabama shouldn’t make it either.

[Cameron @cdmrocks1]

@GotexB @ByuSome @Bevo_Rules They actually have 2-Utah and Arizona.