They waited until the last day—but the gov will be seeking an appeal at the Supreme Court.
We are ready and eager to defend our victory that found the Emergencies Act was used unlawfully and the regulations were unconstitutional.
https://t.co/WGyUSOJJwl
MUST WATCH: @CDNConstFound warns Bill C-22 would create a sweeping "surveillance regime" that threatens Canadians' privacy.
"To have a truly free society, we must be free to make our choices without being monitored—and without even knowing we're being monitored."
Nanaimo's leadership encouraged the cancellation of Ben Bankas' sold-out comedy show, and now we're giving Canadians a chance to respond.
Add your name and message to our letter. We'll print every submission and mail them to City Hall at the end of June.
https://t.co/DmjxtAGllD
This week on Not Reserving Judgment: why Nanaimo, BC got our 2026 Municipal Muzzle Award for censoring Ben Bankas' comedy show. Plus, the status of Bill C-9, which would chill religious speech and may now also outlaw residential school 'denialism.'
https://t.co/NA5CdPgChO
Nanaimo British Columbia is this year's winner of the @CDNConstFound Municipal Muzzle Award for government censorship. Find out how your city did - read our full report here: https://t.co/mX7xhRBYgN
A sold-out comedy show in a publicly-owned venue was cancelled after local politicians objected to the comedian’s material as offensive to some residents.
Congratulations to Nanaimo, BC for earning the CCF’s 2026 Municipal Muzzle Award! Read more: https://t.co/OczFpqiRB6
Results are in!
Nanaimo, BC wins this year's Municipal Muzzle Award after council pressured a publicly-owned theatre to cancel Ben Bankas' comedy show.
Read how censorship is spreading across Canadian cities and towns in Canada's Most Censorious Bylaws: https://t.co/OczFpqiRB6
If you're concerned about Bill C-22 and government access to Canadians' private data, join the thousands who have already signed the CCF's petition opposing expanded government surveillance.
Sign here: https://t.co/GXiqdpOovX
When governments gain new surveillance powers, citizens rarely get their privacy back.
Today, CCF Counsel @awsurgenor appears before Parliament's Public Safety Committee to expose how Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, threatens Canadians' privacy rights.
https://t.co/SGLbVOdUYW
In Episode 135 of Not Reserving Judgment, a deep dive into a decision that says Waterloo Region can't tear down a homeless encampment because that would violate the rights to life, liberty, security of the person and equality. Plus, Alberta to hold a referendum on a referendum.
Bill C-22 would significantly expand government access to Canadians' digital data. The CCF's Josh Dehaas joins Elie Cantin-Nantel to explain lawful access powers and concerns around device tracking and metadata collection.
Watch the full interview now.
https://t.co/psYGJAcagq
This week on the podcast, we tell you about a BC Human Rights Tribunal decision that finds holding the classical liberal view on DEI is not a protected political view, unlike socialism. Plus, we discuss the newly-created tort of intimate partner violence.
https://t.co/CicpfQTQLC
Canadians should not have to give up their privacy to feel secure. Bill C-22 would expand surveillance powers and weaken the protections that safeguard private communications and personal data.
If you believe privacy matters, sign the CCF's petition now: https://t.co/GXiqdpOovX
TODAY: a major test for free expression in the digital age.
The CCF appears this morning at the Supreme Court in a case about Canadians' right to post honest online reviews without facing "SLAPP" lawsuits meant to silence criticism.
https://t.co/eKJxMsBo2L
Canadians are waking up to C-22's risks.
Two main problems:
1. Could allow for backdoors into encrypted services (eg: Signal)
2. Could require telecoms to collect up to 1 year of location data on all of us
Read more: https://t.co/yNkLjn6sgq
Sign here: https://t.co/HsmzcsXSup
We discuss this debacle on today's episode of our podcast, Not Reserving Judgment. I respect and like Jason, but this isn't criminal fraud. It is unlikely its civil fraud either (although I suppose they could try). I expect there were contracts and releases signed that were lawyered favourably for CBC, and the damages would be hard to prove (as I understand it, the victims here were paid, so the damages would be emotional and reputation).
The best bet is probably looking at the contracts for a breach of term. But then again, I assume the contracts are drafted to avoid that.
Willing to be corrected by someone who practices in civil or criminal fraud, this just is my high level take.
And absolutely gross behaviour by CBC and sure doesn't sound like a very funny "comedy".
This week on the podcast, we explain why Kelowna can move ahead with its petition to rein in Freedom Rally protesters, and we discuss an Edmonton Police pilot project using bodycams and facial recognition software.
https://t.co/Vxpg4hzXxl
At long last, spring is here! And that means it's Maple's Garden season 🌱🐝🌿
Download FREE colouring sheets inspired by Maple's story of standing up for her garden and free expression ⬇️⬇️⬇️
https://t.co/BlXE2kX6M0
Were you at CSFN this past weekend? It is one of my favourite events of the year. I love meeting other people who care about individual responsibilities, limited government, and building a freer society. Check out my highlights from this year!
Another thought-provoking discussion at CSFN 2026. @JoshDehaas moderated an insightful panel on getting back to basics in addressing crime and restoring confidence in the justice system.