@Coryhemmi@Element808@leahfiles@ShawnRyan762@ShawnRyanShow Possible, but she also said she was an economist and didn’t know anything about the petro dollar. Was she being intentionally vague on her schooling and work experience? Or was she lying?
@Element808@leahfiles@ShawnRyan762@ShawnRyanShow I don’t understand why he has taken such a vitriolic stance on her. I do think the first 50 minutes were lacking for her life experiences and work. She obviously needs counseling for her intentionally repressing her childhood, but maybe she’s a bad interviewer, I don’t know.
Hey dickhead, you sent the FBI after Catholics, Parents attending school board meetings, you sent the IRS after Tea Party member's, should I keep going?!?
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
@furrytoupee@SharronMcKenna5 Only exigent circumstances would allow for the officer to climb over a lock gate unless he has a warrant. Even though recent case law has allowed for drones to encroach on private property.
@furrytoupee@SharronMcKenna5 This is wrong, you need to clarify to grok that the gate was locked with a chain. Both cases stated are under the assumption that the front door has a common walk way that a reasonable person would believe is allowed for normal travel, I.e. a “track home” development walk path.
@trylimitlessfin@trylimitless It means you don’t own shit, you pay a large down payment, just to get kicked in the teeth after 5 years with a massive arm which they know you can’t afford!
🚨🚨 Billionaire cancer doctor Patrick Soon-Shiong told Tucker Carlson that nearly every oncologist ignores the one number in your blood test that kills cancer:
“Pick up the phone, call any random oncologist—not to shame them—and say: ‘You do a blood count, right?’ A complete blood count. You take blood and check if you’re anemic or not.”
“And you give chemotherapy and radiation, and you ask: ‘What are you looking for?’ Well, we look to see if you’re anemic, so we can give you this drug made by Amgen called Epogen. We look to see if your platelets have dropped, so we can give you a platelet transfusion. We look to see if your neutrophils have dropped so you don’t get an infection, so we give you Neupogen.”
“Well, the problem is, do red blood cells kill cancer? No. Do platelets kill cancer? No. Do neutrophils kill cancer? No.”
“What kills cancer? Natural killer cells and T cells. So in that blood count, there’s one thing called lymphocytes. Do you look at that? No.”
“The only cell that’s important, that kills cancer, and 99.9% of oncologists will say: ‘We don’t pay any attention to that.’”
Even Tucker couldn’t believe it: “Why, if you’re fighting cancer, would you ignore the one cell that fights cancer?”
“That’s the missing link. That’s the key element in your body.”
@SFLTVBossMan@DonutOperator FOIA is bullshit and he’s gonna get the video in a good 20 years after everyone retires, so yes, lawsuit and Subpoena is the only way.
The Catholic Church found itself the target of the largest smear campaign in history. That’s part of the story. The other part is simply that many people wanted it to be true.
BREAKING - Muslims in France are threatening to burn down the Notre Dame Cathedral unless French authorities release Ibrahim Alisaoui, a Muslim migrant who killed three French citizens by stabbing them inside a church in Nice, France.