@UnicornToken@0xUSD@telep_io@unstoppableweb@NFT_NYC@joinFIO@ensdomains@3boxlabs I think it's just too complex for you to understand. UD can and will be lost forever. An ENS owner either produces an economic gain, of more then $5 a year LOL, or loses it to someone who can. It's a great system that forces growth of the whole ecosystem.
@NftRoses @ethdomainss @NFT_NYC@joinFIO@ensdomains@3boxlabs@unstoppableweb The first two are ok.
Their TLDs are a cash grab and dilute original .crypto owners.
The generators are lame.
ENS is owning, pretending people in crypto can't afford $5 a year is LOL. No one can "own" a UD if it's lost.
@UnicornToken@0xUSD@telep_io@unstoppableweb@NFT_NYC@joinFIO@ensdomains@3boxlabs When you can rent FOREVER it's no longer renting,it's owning. The extra cost over UD goes into the ENS treasury which they use to make major improvements and then UD copies these improvements pretending it's not all funded by the ENS model lol.
@NftRoses @ethdomainss @NFT_NYC@joinFIO@ensdomains@3boxlabs@unstoppableweb When you have the option to rent it FOREVER, it's no longer renting, it's owning.
Those extra funds go to improvements that UD then copies anyway lol, so without this "rent" system and what's been built on it UD would have little to nothing.